Consistency between a strain rate model and the ESHM20 earthquake rate forecast in Europe: insights for seismic hazard

Donniol Jouve, Bénédicte; Socquet, Anne; Beauval, Céline; Piña Valdès, Jesus; Danciu, Laurentiu

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1789-2025

Articles | Volume 25, issue 6

https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1789-2025

© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1789-2025

© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 25, issue 6

Research article

|

02 Jun 2025

Research article |

| 02 Jun 2025

Consistency between a strain rate model and the ESHM20 earthquake rate forecast in Europe: insights for seismic hazard

Bénédicte Donniol Jouve, Anne Socquet, Céline Beauval, Jesus Piña Valdès, and Laurentiu Danciu

Related authors

Implementation of an interconnected fault system in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA): the Levant fault system

Sarah El Kadri, Céline Beauval, Marlène Brax, and Yann Klinger

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3397–3419, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3397-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3397-2025, 2025

Short summary

Testing the 2020 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM20) against observations from Romania

Elena F. Manea, Laurentiu Danciu, Carmen O. Cioflan, Dragos Toma-Danila, and Matthew C. Gerstenberger

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1-2025, 2025

Short summary

The European Fault-Source Model 2020 (EFSM20): geologic input data for the European Seismic Hazard Model 2020

Roberto Basili, Laurentiu Danciu, Céline Beauval, Karin Sesetyan, Susana Pires Vilanova, Shota Adamia, Pierre Arroucau, Jure Atanackov, Stéphane Baize, Carolina Canora, Riccardo Caputo, Michele Matteo Cosimo Carafa, Edward Marc Cushing, Susana Custódio, Mine Betul Demircioglu Tumsa, João C. Duarte, Athanassios Ganas, Julián García-Mayordomo, Laura Gómez de la Peña, Eulàlia Gràcia, Petra Jamšek Rupnik, Hervé Jomard, Vanja Kastelic, Francesco Emanuele Maesano, Raquel Martín-Banda, Sara Martínez-Loriente, Marta Neres, Hector Perea, Barbara Šket Motnikar, Mara Monica Tiberti, Nino Tsereteli, Varvara Tsironi, Roberto Vallone, Kris Vanneste, Polona Zupančič, and Domenico Giardini

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3945–3976, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3945-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3945-2024, 2024

Short summary

The Earthquake Risk Model of Switzerland, ERM-CH23

Athanasios N. Papadopoulos, Philippe Roth, Laurentiu Danciu, Paolo Bergamo, Francesco Panzera, Donat Fäh, Carlo Cauzzi, Blaise Duvernay, Alireza Khodaverdian, Pierino Lestuzzi, Ömer Odabaşi, Ettore Fagà, Paolo Bazzurro, Michèle Marti, Nadja Valenzuela, Irina Dallo, Nicolas Schmid, Philip Kästli, Florian Haslinger, and Stefan Wiemer

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3561–3578, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3561-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3561-2024, 2024

Short summary

The 2020 European Seismic Hazard Model: overview and results

Laurentiu Danciu, Domenico Giardini, Graeme Weatherill, Roberto Basili, Shyam Nandan, Andrea Rovida, Céline Beauval, Pierre-Yves Bard, Marco Pagani, Celso G. Reyes, Karin Sesetyan, Susana Vilanova, Fabrice Cotton, and Stefan Wiemer

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3049–3073, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3049-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3049-2024, 2024

Short summary

Modelling seismic ground motion and its uncertainty in different tectonic contexts: challenges and application to the 2020 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM20)

Graeme Weatherill, Sreeram Reddy Kotha, Laurentiu Danciu, Susana Vilanova, and Fabrice Cotton

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1795–1834, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1795-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1795-2024, 2024

Short summary

Towards a dynamic earthquake risk framework for Switzerland

Maren Böse, Laurentiu Danciu, Athanasios Papadopoulos, John Clinton, Carlo Cauzzi, Irina Dallo, Leila Mizrahi, Tobias Diehl, Paolo Bergamo, Yves Reuland, Andreas Fichtner, Philippe Roth, Florian Haslinger, Frédérick Massin, Nadja Valenzuela, Nikola Blagojević, Lukas Bodenmann, Eleni Chatzi, Donat Fäh, Franziska Glueer, Marta Han, Lukas Heiniger, Paulina Janusz, Dario Jozinović, Philipp Kästli, Federica Lanza, Timothy Lee, Panagiotis Martakis, Michèle Marti, Men-Andrin Meier, Banu Mena Cabrera, Maria Mesimeri, Anne Obermann, Pilar Sanchez-Pastor, Luca Scarabello, Nicolas Schmid, Anastasiia Shynkarenko, Bozidar Stojadinović, Domenico Giardini, and Stefan Wiemer

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 583–607, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-583-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-583-2024, 2024

Short summary

The communication strategy for the release of the first European Seismic Risk Model and the updated European Seismic Hazard Model

Irina Dallo, Michèle Marti, Nadja Valenzuela, Helen Crowley, Jamal Dabbeek, Laurentiu Danciu, Simone Zaugg, Fabrice Cotton, Domenico Giardini, Rui Pinho, John F. Schneider, Céline Beauval, António A. Correia, Olga-Joan Ktenidou, Päivi Mäntyniemi, Marco Pagani, Vitor Silva, Graeme Weatherill, and Stefan Wiemer

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 291–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-291-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-291-2024, 2024

Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, J. G. and Luco, J. E.: Consequences of slip rate constraints on earthquake occurrence relations, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 73, 471–496, https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0730020471, 1983. a, b, c, d

Avouac, J.-P.: From Geodetic Imaging of Seismic and Aseismic Fault Slip to Dynamic Modeling of the Seismic Cycle, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 43, 233–271, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060614-105302, 2015. a, b

Basili, R., Danciu, L., Beauval, C., Sesetyan, K., Vilanova, S. P., Adamia, S., Arroucau, P., Atanackov, J., Baize, S., Canora, C., Caputo, R., Carafa, M. M. C., Cushing, E. M., Custódio, S., Demircioglu Tumsa, M. B., Duarte, J. C., Ganas, A., García-Mayordomo, J., Gómez de la Peña, L., Gràcia, E., Jamšek Rupnik, P., Jomard, H., Kastelic, V., Maesano, F. E., Martín-Banda, R., Martínez-Loriente, S., Neres, M., Perea, H., Šket Motnikar, B., Tiberti, M. M., Tsereteli, N., Tsironi, V., Vallone, R., Vanneste, K., Zupančič, P., and Giardini, D.: The European Fault-Source Model 2020 (EFSM20): geologic input data for the European Seismic Hazard Model 2020, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3945–3976, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3945-2024, 2024. a, b, c, d, e

Beauval, C., Marinière, J., Yepes, H., Audin, L., Nocquet, J., Alvarado, A., Baize, S., Aguilar, J., Singaucho, J., and Jomard, H.: A New Seismic Hazard Model for Ecuador, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 108, 1443–1464, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170259, 2018. a

Bird, P.: Long-term fault slip rates, distributed deformation rates, and forecast of seismicity in the western United States from joint fitting of community geologic, geodetic, and stress direction data sets, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 114, B11403, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006317, 2009. a

Jenny, S., Goes, S., Giardini, D., and Kahle, H.-G.: Earthquake recurrence parameters from seismic and geodetic strain rates in the eastern Mediterranean, Geophys. J. Int., 157, 1331–1347, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02261.x, 2004. a, b, c, d

Kagan, Y. Y.: Seismic moment distribution revisited: II. Moment conservation principle: Seismic moment distribution revisited: II, Geophys. J. Int., 149, 731–754, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01671.x, 2002. a

Keiding, M., Kreemer, C., Lindholm, C., Gradmann, S., Olesen, O., and Kierulf, H.: A comparison of strain rates and seismicity for Fennoscandia: depth dependency of deformation from glacial isostatic adjustment, Geophys. J. Int., 202, 1021–1028, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv207, 2015. a

Kierulf, H. P., Steffen, H., Barletta, V. R., Lidberg, M., Johansson, J., Kristiansen, O., and Tarasov, L.: A GNSS velocity field for geophysical applications in Fennoscandia, J. Geodyn., 146, 101845, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2021.101845, 2021. a

Kreemer, C. and Young, Z. M.: Crustal Strain Rates in the Western United States and Their Relationship with Earthquake Rates, Seismol. Res. Lett., 93, 2990–3008, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220153, 2022. a

Lammers, S., Weatherill, G., Grünthal, G., and Cotton, F.: EMEC-2021 - The European-Mediterranean Earthquake Catalogue – Version 2021, GFZ Data Services [data set], https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.EMEC.2021.001, 2023. a

Leonard, M.: Earthquake Fault Scaling: Self-Consistent Relating of Rupture Length, Width, Average Displacement, and Moment Release, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 100, 1971–1988, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090189, 2010. a

Leonard, M.: Self-Consistent Earthquake Fault-Scaling Relations: Update and Extension to Stable Continental Strike-Slip Faults, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 104, 2953–2965, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140087, 2014. a

Lukk, A. A., Leonova, V. G., and Sidorin, A. Y.: Revisiting the Origin of Seismicity in Fennoscandia, Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phy., 55, 743–758, https://doi.org/10.1134/S000143381907003X, 2019. a

Mariniere, J.: Improving earthquake forecast models for PSHA with geodetic data, applied on Ecuador, PhD thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes [2020-....], https://theses.hal.science/tel-03276307 (last access: 1 January 2024), 2020. a

Mariniere, J., Beauval, C., Nocquet, J.-M., Chlieh, M., and Yepes, H.: Earthquake Recurrence Model for the Colombia–Ecuador Subduction Zone Constrained from Seismic and Geodetic Data, Implication for PSHA, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 111, 1508–1528, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200338, 2021. a, b, c, d

Mathey, M., Walpersdorf, A., Baize, S., Sue, C., Doin, M.-P., and Potin, B.: 3D deformation in the South-Western European Alps (Briançon region) revealed by 20 years of geodetic data, EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, 8–13 April 2018, EGU2018-10415, 2018. a

Mazzotti, S. and Adams, J.: Rates and uncertainties on seismic moment and deformation in eastern Canada, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 110, B09301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003510, 2005. a, b

Mazzotti, S., Lambert, A., Henton, J., James, T. S., and Courtier, N.: Absolute gravity calibration of GPS velocities and glacial isostatic adjustment in mid-continent North America, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L24311, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049846, 2011. a, b

Meletti, C., Marzocchi, W., D'Amico, V., Lanzano, G., Luzi, L., Martinelli, F., Pace, B., Rovida, A., Taroni, M., Visini, F., and Group, M. W.: The new Italian seismic hazard model (MPS19), Ann. Geophys.-Italy, 64, SE112, https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8579, 2021. a, b

Nocquet, J.-M.: Present-day kinematics of the Mediterranean: A comprehensive overview of GPS results, Tectonophysics, 579, 220–242, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.03.037, 2012. a

Pancha, A.: Comparison of Seismic and Geodetic Scalar Moment Rates across the Basin and Range Province, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, 11–32, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040166, 2006. a, b

Papadopoulos, G. A.: Seismic and volcanic activities and aseismic movements as plate motion components in the Aegean area, Tectonophysics, 167, 31–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(89)90292-8, 1989. a

Pérez‐Gussinyé, M., Lowry, A. R., Watts, A. B., and Velicogna, I.: On the recovery of effective elastic thickness using spectral methods: examples from synthetic data and from the Fennoscandian Shield, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 109, B10409, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002788, 2004. a

Piña-Valdés, J., Socquet, A., Beauval, C., Doin, M.-P., D’Agostino, N., and Shen, Z.-K.: 3D GNSS Velocity Field Sheds Light on the Deformation Mechanisms in Europe: Effects of the Vertical Crustal Motion on the Distribution of Seismicity, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 127, e2021JB023451, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023451, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p

Reid, H. F.: The mechanics of the earthquake, the California earthquake of April 18, 1906; Report of the State Investigation Commission, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C., 1910. a, b

Riguzzi, F., Crespi, M., Devoti, R., Doglioni, C., Pietrantonio, G., and Pisani, A. R.: Geodetic strain rate and earthquake size: New clues for seismic hazard studies, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 206–207, 67–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2012.07.005, 2012. a

Rovida, A., Antonucci, A., and Locati, M.: The European Preinstrumental Earthquake Catalogue EPICA, the 1000–1899 catalogue for the European Seismic Hazard Model 2020, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5213–5231, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5213-2022, 2022. a

Savage, J. C. and Simpson, R. W.: Surface strain accumulation and the seismic moment tensor, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 87, 1345–1353, https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0870051345, 1997. a, b, c

Shen, Z., Wang, M., Zeng, Y., and Wang, F.: Optimal Interpolation of Spatially Discretized Geodetic Data, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 105, 2117–2127, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140247, 2015. a, b, c, d

Shen, Z.-K., Jackson, D. D., and Kagan, Y. Y.: Implications of Geodetic Strain Rate for Future Earthquakes, with a Five-Year Forecast of M5 Earthquakes in Southern California, Seismol. Res. Lett., 78, 116–120, https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.78.1.116, 2007. a

Steffen, H. and Wu, P.: Glacial isostatic adjustment in Fennoscandia – A review of data and modeling, J. Geodyn., 52, 169–204, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2011.03.002, 2011. a

Stevens, V. L. and Avouac, J.-P.: On the relationship between strain rate and seismicity in the India–Asia collision zone: implications for probabilistic seismic hazard, Geophys. J. Int., 226, 220–245, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab098, 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h

Stirling, M., Mcverry, G., Gerstenberger, M., Litchfield, N., Dissen, R., Berryman, K., Barnes, P., Wallace, L., Villamor, P., Langridge, R., Lamarche, G., Nodder, S., Reyners, M., Bradley, B., Rhoades, D., Smith, W., Nicol, A., Pettinga, J., Clark, K., and Jacobs, K.: National Seismic Hazard Model for New Zealand: 2010 Update, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 102, 1514–1542, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110170, 2012. a

Valensise, G., Pantosti, D., and Basili, R.: Seismology and Tectonic Setting of the 2002 Molise, Italy, Earthquake, Earthq. Spectra, 20, 23–37, https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1756136, 2004. a

Visini, F., Pace, B., Meletti, C., Marzocchi, W., Akinci, A., Azzaro, R., Barani, S., Barberi, G., Barreca, G., and Basili, R.: Earthquake Rupture Forecasts for the MPS19 Seismic Hazard Model of Italy, Ann. Geophys.-Italy, 64, SE220, https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8608, 2021. a, b, c

Ward, S. N.: On the consistency of earthquake moment rates, geological fault data, and space geodetic strain: the United States, Geophys. J. Int., 134, 172–186, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00556.x, 1998. a, b, c, d

Woessner, J., Laurentiu, D., Giardini, D., Crowley, H., Cotton, F., Grünthal, G., Valensise, G., Arvidsson, R., Basili, R., Demircioglu, M. B., Hiemer, S., Meletti, C., Musson, R. W., Rovida, A. N., Sesetyan, K., Stucchi, M., and The SHARE Consortium: The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model: key components and results, B. Earthq. Eng., 13, 3553–3596, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9795-1, 2015. a

Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities: Seismic hazards in Southern California: Probable earthquakes, 1994 to 2024, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 85, 379–439, 1995. a, b, c

Zeng, Y., Petersen, M. D., and Shen, Z.-K.: Earthquake Potential in California-Nevada Implied by Correlation of Strain Rate and Seismicity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1778–1785, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075967, 2018. a, b

More articles (51)

Download

Article (12506 KB)

Full-text XML

BibTeX

EndNote

Short summary

We investigate how geodetic monitoring enhances accuracy in seismic hazard assessment. By utilizing geodetic strain rate maps for Europe and the European Seismic Hazard Model 2020 source model, we compare geodetic and seismic moment rates across the continent while addressing associated uncertainties. Our analysis reveals primary compatibility in high-activity zones. In well-constrained regions of lower activity, we also observed an overlap in the distribution of seismic and geodetic moments.

We investigate how geodetic monitoring enhances accuracy in seismic hazard assessment. By...

Read more

Share

Altmetrics

Final-revised paper

Preprint