ASFPM: Flood Mapping for the Nation: A Cost Analysis for Completing and
Maintaining the Nation's NFIP Flood Map Inventory, Tech. Rep., Association of
State Floodplain Managers, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2020.
a,
b,
c
Barbet-Massin, M., Jiguet, F., Albert, C. H., and Thuiller, W.: Selecting
pseudo‐absences for species distribution models: how, where and how
many?, Methods Ecol. Evol., 3, 327–338, 2012.
a,
b,
c
Bates, P. D., Quinn, N., Sampson, C., et al.: Combined modelling of US
fluvial, pluvial and coastal flood hazard under current and future
climates, Water Resour. Res., e2020WR028673, 2020. a
Beven, K. J. and Kirkby, M. J.: A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology/Un modèle à base physique de zone d'appel variable de l'hydrologie du bassin
versant, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 24, 43–69, 1979. a
Blessing, R., Sebastian, A., and Brody, S. D.: Flood risk delineation in the
United States: How much loss are we capturing?, Nat. Hazards Rev., 18,
04017002,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000242, 2017.
a,
b,
c
Breiman, L.: Out-of-bag estimation, Techinical report, Department of Statistics, University of California, 1996. a
Breiman, L.: Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, 2001. a
Brody, S., Blessing, R., Sebastian, A., and Bedient, P.: Examining the impact
of land use/land cover characteristics on flood
losses, J. Environ. Plann. Man., 57, 1252–1265,
https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.802228, 2013.
a
Brody, S., Sebastian, A., Blessing, R., and Bedient, P.: Case study results
from southeast Houston, Texas: identifying the impacts of residential
location on flood risk and loss, J. Flood Risk Manag., 11, 110–120, 2018. a
Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Highfield, W. E., Bernhardt, S. P., and Vedlitz, A.: Policy Learning for Flood Mitigation: A Longitudinal Assessment of the
Community Rating System in Florida, Risk Anal., 29, 912–929,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01210.x, 2009.
a
Brody, S. D., Highfield, W. E., and Blessing, R.: An Analysis of the Effects of Land Use and Land Cover on Flood Losses along the Gulf of Mexico Coast from 1999 to 2009, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 51, 1556–1567, 2015.
a,
b,
c
Bui, D. T., Ngo, P. T. T., Pham, T. D., Jaafari, A., Minh, N. Q., Hoa, P. V.,
and Samui, P.: A novel hybrid approach based on a swarm intelligence
optimized extreme learning machine for flash flood susceptibility mapping,
Catena, 179, 184–196,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.04.009, 2019.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Bureau, U. C.: American FactFinder – Results, available at:
https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=population total&g=3900000US480840,483362&tid=DECENNIALDPSF22000.DP1&hidePreview=false (last access: 24 February 2021), 2019.
a,
b
Darabi, H., Choubin, B., Rahmati, O., Torabi Haghighi, A., Pradhan, B., and
Kløve, B.: Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and QUEST models: A
comparative study of machine learning techniques, J. Hydrol., 569,
142–154,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.002, 2019.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Dodangeh, E., Choubin, B., Eigdir, A. N., Nabipour, N., Panahi, M.,
Shamshirband, S., and Mosavi, A.: Integrated machine learning methods with
resampling algorithms for flood susceptibility
prediction, Sci. Total Environ., 705, 135983,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135983, 2020.
a,
b,
c
Elith, J., Phillips, S. J., Hastie, T., Dudík, M., Chee, Y. E., and Yates,
C. J.: A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for
ecologists, Divers. Distrib., 17, 43–57, 2011. a
Galloway, G. E., Reilly, A., Ryoo, S., Riley, A., Haslam, M., Brody, S.,
Highfield, W., Gunn, J., Rainey, J., and Parker, S.: The Growing Threat of
Urban Flooding: A National Challenge, College Park and Galveston: University
of Maryland and Texas A&M University, 44 pp., 2018. a
Garousi-Nejad, I., Tarboton, D. G., Aboutalebi, M., and Torres-Rua, A. F.:
Terrain analysis enhancements to the height above nearest drainage flood
inundation mapping method, Water Resour. Res., 55, 7983–8009, 2019. a
Gori, A., Blessing, R., Juan, A., Brody, S., and Bedient, P.: Characterizing
urbanization impacts on floodplain through integrated land use, hydrologic,
and hydraulic modeling, J. Hydrol., 568, 82–95, 2019. a
Hall, M. J.: Urban hydrology, Elsevier Applied Science Publishing, London, UK, 299, 1984. a
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al: Array programming with NumPy, Nature, 585, 357–362,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2, 2020.
a
Highfield, W. E., Norman, S. A., and Brody, S. D.: Examining the 100-Year
Floodplain as a Metric of Risk, Loss, and Household
Adjustment, Risk Anal., 33, 186–191,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01840.x, 2013.
a,
b
Hosseini, F. S., Choubin, B., Mosavi, A., Nabipour, N., Shamshirband, S.,
Darabi, H., and Haghighi, A. T.: Flash-flood hazard assessment using
ensembles and Bayesian-based machine learning models: Application of the
simulated annealing feature selection
method, Sci. Total Environ., 711, 135161,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135161, 2019.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Ikeuchi, H., Hirabayashi, Y., Yamazaki, D., Muis, S., Ward, P. J., Winsemius,
H. C., Verlaan, M., and Kanae, S.: Compound simulation of fluvial floods and
storm surges in a global coupled river-coast flood model: Model development
and its application to 2007 Cyclone Sidr in
Bangladesh, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 9, 1847–1862, 2017. a
Janizadeh, S., Avand, M., Jaafari, A., Phong, T. V., Bayat, M., Ahmadisharaf,
E., Prakash, I., Pham, B. T., and Lee, S.: Prediction Success of Machine
Learning Methods for Flash Flood Susceptibility Mapping in the Tafresh
Watershed, Iran, Sustainability-Basel, 11, 5426,
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195426,
2019a.
a,
b,
c,
d
Jenson, S. K. and Domingue, J. O.: Extracting topographic structure from
digital elevation data for geographic information system
analysis, Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S., 54, 1593–1600, 1988. a
Knighton, J., Buchanan, B., Guzman, C., Elliott, R., White, E., and Rahm, B.:
Predicting flood insurance claims with hydrologic and socioeconomic
demographics via machine learning: exploring the roles of topography,
minority populations, and political
dissimilarity, J. Environ. Manage., 272, 111051,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111051, 2020.
a,
b
LandFire: Homepage of the LANDFIRE Program, available at:
https://www.landfire.gov/ (last access: 4 March 2020), 2010. a
Lee, S., Kim, J.-C., Jung, H.-S., Lee, M. J., and Lee, S.: Spatial prediction of flood susceptibility using random-forest and boosted-tree models in Seoul metropolitan city, Korea, Geomat. Nat. Haz. Risk, 8, 1185–1203,
https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1308971, 2017.
a,
b,
c
Li, B., Wang, Q., and Hu, J.: A fast SVM training method for very large
datasets, in: Neural Networks, 2009. IJCNN 2009. International Joint
Conference on, 1784–1789, 2009. a
Liu, Y. Y., Maidment, D. R., Tarboton, D. G., Zheng, X., Yildirim, A., Sazib,
N. S., and Wang, S.: A CyberGIS approach to generating high-resolution height
above nearest drainage (HAND) raster for national flood mapping, CyberGIS,
16, 24–26, 2016. a
Mobley, W., Sebastian, A., Highfield, W., and Brody, S. D.: Estimating flood
extent during Hurricane Harvey using maximum entropy to build a hazard
distribution model, J. Flood Risk Manag., 12, e12549,
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12549, 2019.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g
Moradkhani, H. and Sorooshian, S.: General review of rainfall-runoff modeling:
model calibration, data assimilation, and uncertainty analysis, in:
Hydrological modelling and the water cycle, edited by: Sorooshian, S., Hsu, K. L., Coppola, E., Tomassetti, B., Verdecchia, M., and Visconti, G., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1–24,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77843-1_1, 2009.
a
Morss, R. E., Wilhelmi, O. V., Downton, M. W., and Gruntfest, E.: Flood risk,
uncertainty, and scientific information for decision making: lessons from an
interdisciplinary project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
86, 1593,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-11-1593, 2005.
a
Mosavi, A., Ozturk, P., and Chau, K.-w.: Flood prediction using machine
learning models: Literature review, Water, 10, 1536,
https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111536, 2018.
a,
b
Moy de Vitry, M., Kramer, S., Wegner, J. D., and Leitão, J. P.: Scalable flood level trend monitoring with surveillance cameras using a deep convolutional neural network, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4621–4634,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4621-2019, 2019.
a
Muñoz, P., Orellana-Alvear, J., Willems, P., and Célleri, R.: Flash-Flood
Forecasting in an Andean Mountain Catchment – Development of a Step-Wise
Methodology Based on the Random Forest Algorithm, Water, 10, 1519,
https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111519, 2018.
a
NHC:
https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/climo/ (last access: 4 March 2020), Tropical Cyclone Climatology, 2015. a
Nobre, A. D., Cuartas, L. A., Hodnett, M., Rennó, C. D., Rodrigues, G.,
Silveira, A., and Saleska, S.: Height Above the Nearest Drainage – a
hydrologically relevant new terrain model, J. Hydrol., 404, 13–29,
2011.
a,
b
Office, C. B.: The National Flood Insurance Program: Financial Soundness and
Affordability, Report, Congress of the United States congressional budget office, Washington D.C., 44 pp., 2017. a
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel,
O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J.,
Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., and Duchesnay, E.:
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn.
Res., 12, 2825–2830, available at:
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1953048.2078195 (last access: 4 March 2020), 2011.
a,
b
Phillips, S. J., Dudík, M., Elith, J., Graham, C. H., Lehmann, A., Leathwick,
J., and Ferrier, S.: Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution
models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data, Ecol.
Appl., 19, 181–197,
https://doi.org/10.1890/07-2153.1, 2009.
a
Quinlan, J. R.: Induction of decision trees, Mach. Learn., 1, 81–106, 1986.
Rahmati, O. and Pourghasemi, H. R.: Identification of Critical Flood Prone
Areas in Data-Scarce and Ungauged Regions: A Comparison of Three Data Mining
Models, Water Res. Manag., 31, 1473–1487,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1589-6, 2017.
a,
b,
c,
d
Rajib, A., Liu, Z., Merwade, V., Tavakoly, A. A., and Follum, M. L.: Towards a
large-scale locally relevant flood inundation modeling framework using SWAT
and LISFLOOD-FP, J. Hydrol., 581, 124406,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124406, 2020.
a
Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L., and Miller, N.: Green-Ampt Infiltration
Parameters from Soils Data, J. Hydraul. Eng., 109, 62–70,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:1(62), 1983.
a
Rodda, H. J.: The development and application of a flood risk model for the
Czech Republic, Nat. Hazards, 36, 207–220, 2005. a
Sebastian, A., Gori, A., Blessing, R. B., van der Wiel, K., and Bass, B.:
Disentangling the impacts of human and environmental change on catchment
response during Hurricane Harvey, Environ. Res. Lett., 14,
124023,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5234, 2019.
a
Singh, V.: Effect of spatial and temporal variability in rainfall and watershed
characteristics on stream flow hydrograph, Hydrol. Process., 11,
1649–1669, 1997. a
Sørensen, R., Zinko, U., and Seibert, J.: On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observations, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 101–112,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-101-2006, 2006.
a
Tehrany, M. S., Jones, S., and Shabani, F.: Identifying the essential flood
conditioning factors for flood prone area mapping using machine learning
techniques, Catena, 175, 174–192,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.011,
2019a.
a,
b,
c,
d
Tehrany, M. S., Kumar, L., and Shabani, F.: A novel GIS-based ensemble
technique for flood susceptibility mapping using evidential belief function
and support vector machine: Brisbane, Australia, PeerJ, 7, e7653,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7653, 2019b.
a,
b,
c
Thomas, H. and Nisbet, T.: An assessment of the impact of floodplain woodland
on flood flows, Water Environ. J., 21, 114–126, 2007. a
Upstill-Goddard, R., Eccles, D., Fliege, J., and Collins, A.: Machine learning
approaches for the discovery of gene-gene interactions in disease data,
Brief. Bioinform., 14, 251–60,
https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs024, 2013.
a
Van Oldenborgh, G. J., Van Der Wiel, K., Sebastian, A., Singh, R., Arrighi, J.,
Otto, F., Haustein, K., Li, S., Vecchi, G., and Cullen, H.: Attribution of
extreme rainfall from Hurricane Harvey, August 2017, Environ. Res.
Lett., 12, 124009,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa343, 2017.
a
Wagenaar, D., de Jong, J., and Bouwer, L. M.: Multi-variable flood damage modelling with limited data using supervised learning approaches, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1683–1696,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1683-2017, 2017.
a
Ward, P. J., Jongman, B., Salamon, P., Simpson, A., Bates, P., De Groeve, T.,
Muis, S., De Perez, E. C., Rudari, R., Trigg, M. A., and Winsemius, H. C.: Usefulness and
limitations of global flood risk models, Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 712–715,
2015. a
White, M. D. and Greer, K. A.: The effects of watershed urbanization on the
stream hydrology and riparian vegetation of Los Penasquitos Creek,
California, Landscape Urban Plan., 74, 125–138, 2006. a
Wing, O. E., Bates, P. D., Smith, A. M., Sampson, C. C., Johnson, K. A.,
Fargione, J., and Morefield, P.: Estimates of present and future flood risk
in the conterminous United States, Environ. Res. Lett., 13,
034023,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaac65, 2018.
a
Wisz, M. S. and Guisan, A.: Do pseudo-absence selection strategies influence
species distribution models and their predictions? An information-theoretic
approach based on simulated data, BMC Ecology, 9, 8,
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-9-8, 2009.
a
Woznicki, S. A., Baynes, J., Panlasigui, S., Mehaffey, M., and Neale, A.:
Development of a spatially complete floodplain map of the conterminous United
States using random forest, Sci. Total Environ., 647, 942–953,
2019.
a,
b
