Articles | Volume 21, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-559-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-559-2021
Research article
 | 
05 Feb 2021
Research article |  | 05 Feb 2021

Simulating historical flood events at the continental scale: observational validation of a large-scale hydrodynamic model

Oliver E. J. Wing, Andrew M. Smith, Michael L. Marston, Jeremy R. Porter, Mike F. Amodeo, Christopher C. Sampson, and Paul D. Bates

Viewed

Total article views: 3,747 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,828 870 49 3,747 51 59
  • HTML: 2,828
  • PDF: 870
  • XML: 49
  • Total: 3,747
  • BibTeX: 51
  • EndNote: 59
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Oct 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,747 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,365 with geography defined and 382 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 18 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Global flood models are difficult to validate. They generally output theoretical flood events of a given probability rather than an observed event that they can be tested against. Here, we adapt a US-wide flood model to enable the rapid simulation of historical flood events in order to more robustly understand model biases. For 35 flood events, we highlight the challenges of model validation amidst observational data errors yet evidence the increasing skill of large-scale models.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint