Articles | Volume 21, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3285-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3285-2021
Review article
 | 
04 Nov 2021
Review article |  | 04 Nov 2021

Review article: Mapping the adaptation solution space – lessons from Jakarta

Mia Wannewitz and Matthias Garschagen

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (22 Mar 2021) by Paolo Tarolli
AR by Mia Wannewitz on behalf of the Authors (15 Jul 2021)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (27 Jul 2021) by Paolo Tarolli
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (30 Jul 2021)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (04 Aug 2021)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (01 Sep 2021) by Paolo Tarolli
AR by Mia Wannewitz on behalf of the Authors (21 Sep 2021)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (26 Sep 2021) by Paolo Tarolli
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (26 Sep 2021) by Paolo Tarolli (Executive editor)
AR by Mia Wannewitz on behalf of the Authors (30 Sep 2021)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Focusing on Jakarta as a city with high flood risk and adaptation pressure, this study presents findings from a systematic literature review of adaptation options and the adaptation solution space to counter the city’s flood problem. Results indicate that the perceived solution space is skewed towards protection against flooding, while soft and hybrid adaptation options are less considered. This significantly influences flood risk management, including its effectiveness and sustainability.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint