Articles | Volume 21, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2829-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2829-2021
Research article
 | 
16 Sep 2021
Research article |  | 16 Sep 2021

Global flood exposure from different sized rivers

Mark V. Bernhofen, Mark A. Trigg, P. Andrew Sleigh, Christopher C. Sampson, and Andrew M. Smith

Viewed

Total article views: 3,301 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,326 913 62 3,301 253 54 49
  • HTML: 2,326
  • PDF: 913
  • XML: 62
  • Total: 3,301
  • Supplement: 253
  • BibTeX: 54
  • EndNote: 49
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Apr 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Apr 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,301 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,147 with geography defined and 154 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
The use of different global datasets to calculate flood exposure can lead to differences in global flood exposure estimates. In this study, we use three global population datasets and a simple measure of a river’s flood susceptibility (based on the terrain alone) to explore how the choice of population data and the size of river represented in global flood models affect global and national flood exposure estimates.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint