Articles | Volume 21, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2829-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2829-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Global flood exposure from different sized rivers
School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, Leeds, UK
Mark A. Trigg
School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, Leeds, UK
P. Andrew Sleigh
School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, Leeds, UK
Christopher C. Sampson
Fathom, Square Works, 17–18 Berkeley Square, BS8 1HB, Bristol, UK
Andrew M. Smith
Fathom, Square Works, 17–18 Berkeley Square, BS8 1HB, Bristol, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 5,507 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 09 Apr 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,673 | 1,711 | 123 | 5,507 | 596 | 139 | 159 |
- HTML: 3,673
- PDF: 1,711
- XML: 123
- Total: 5,507
- Supplement: 596
- BibTeX: 139
- EndNote: 159
Total article views: 4,351 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Sep 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,074 | 1,174 | 103 | 4,351 | 239 | 133 | 148 |
- HTML: 3,074
- PDF: 1,174
- XML: 103
- Total: 4,351
- Supplement: 239
- BibTeX: 133
- EndNote: 148
Total article views: 1,156 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 09 Apr 2021)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 599 | 537 | 20 | 1,156 | 357 | 6 | 11 |
- HTML: 599
- PDF: 537
- XML: 20
- Total: 1,156
- Supplement: 357
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 11
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 5,507 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,299 with geography defined
and 208 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 4,351 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,203 with geography defined
and 148 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,156 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,096 with geography defined
and 60 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
29 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The Role of Global Data Sets for Riverine Flood Risk Management at National Scales M. Bernhofen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031555
- Unraveling Long-Term Flood Risk Dynamics Across the Murray-Darling Basin Using a Large-Scale Hydraulic Model and Satellite Data S. Ceola et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.797259
- Towards Interpreting Machine‐Learning Models for Multi‐Step Ahead Daily Streamflow Forecasting R. Hao & H. Yan https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70163
- Optimizing Flood Hazard Zonation and Planning Landscape‐Based Mitigation Measures in Gimba Sub Watersheds, Northeastern Ethiopia: A Comprehensive Approach D. Teku et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70172
- Comparing the suitability of global gridded population datasets for local landslide risk assessments A. Opdyke & K. Fatima https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06283-5
- Using global datasets to estimate flood exposure at the city scale: an evaluation in Addis Ababa A. Carr et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1330295
- Small wetlands: Critical to flood management B. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ads2055
- A global-scale applicable framework of landslide dam formation susceptibility H. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02306-9
- Climate threats to coastal infrastructure and sustainable development outcomes D. Adshead et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01950-2
- Microplastics distribution, ecological risk and outflows of rivers in the Bohai Rim region of China - A flux model considering small and medium-sized rivers X. Hou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176035
- Connecting hydrological modelling and forecasting from global to local scales: Perspectives from an international joint virtual workshop A. Dasgupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12880
- An asset-level analysis of financial tail risks under extreme weather events R. Kerkhofs et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/addf6f
- Can geomorphic flood descriptors coupled with machine learning models enhance in quantifying flood risks over data-scarce catchments? Development of a hybrid framework for Ganga basin (India) V. Tripathi & M. Mohanty https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33507-3
- Comprehensive Assessment of Large-Scale Regional Fluvial Flood Exposure Using Public Datasets: A Case Study from China X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13100357
- Effects of cryospheric hydrological processes on future flood inundation and the subsequent socioeconomic exposures in Central Asia N. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca491
- The Vulnerability and Resilience of Drinking Water Systems to Extreme Weather Events and Future Climate Change G. Howard et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-026-00524-y
- Varying flood exposure due to uncertain data of flood hazard and population distribution W. Shao et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae0fae
- On the right track of flood planning policy? Land uptake in Central-European floodplains (1990–2018) M. Dolejš et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104560
- Assessing open‐access digital elevation models for hydrological applications in a large scale plain: Drainage networks, shallow water bodies and vertical accuracy A. Golin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.6035
- Water Resources in Africa under Global Change: Monitoring Surface Waters from Space F. Papa et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-022-09700-9
- Integrating social vulnerability into high-resolution global flood risk mapping S. Fox et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47394-2
- Flood hazard potential reveals global floodplain settlement patterns L. Devitt et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38297-9
- Yomra Deresi Havzasının Taşkın Maruziyet Analizi O. Ertoğral & İ. Çiçek https://doi.org/10.21324/dacd.1725047
- Accelerated Settlement Expansion in High-Hazard Areas of the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna Delta Y. Ye & L. He https://doi.org/10.3390/w18091029
- Analysis of the fundamental differences between dam-forming landslides and all landslides H. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109665
- Global population datasets overestimate flood exposure in Sweden K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71330-5
- Population exposure predicts flood losses in Sweden K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-026-00194-8
- Flood Vulnerability Assessment Using Satellite Imagery Data E. Koliokosta https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2023.1112001
- Unknown risk: assessing refugee camp flood risk in Ethiopia M. Bernhofen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acd8d0
29 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The Role of Global Data Sets for Riverine Flood Risk Management at National Scales M. Bernhofen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031555
- Unraveling Long-Term Flood Risk Dynamics Across the Murray-Darling Basin Using a Large-Scale Hydraulic Model and Satellite Data S. Ceola et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.797259
- Towards Interpreting Machine‐Learning Models for Multi‐Step Ahead Daily Streamflow Forecasting R. Hao & H. Yan https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70163
- Optimizing Flood Hazard Zonation and Planning Landscape‐Based Mitigation Measures in Gimba Sub Watersheds, Northeastern Ethiopia: A Comprehensive Approach D. Teku et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70172
- Comparing the suitability of global gridded population datasets for local landslide risk assessments A. Opdyke & K. Fatima https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06283-5
- Using global datasets to estimate flood exposure at the city scale: an evaluation in Addis Ababa A. Carr et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1330295
- Small wetlands: Critical to flood management B. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ads2055
- A global-scale applicable framework of landslide dam formation susceptibility H. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02306-9
- Climate threats to coastal infrastructure and sustainable development outcomes D. Adshead et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01950-2
- Microplastics distribution, ecological risk and outflows of rivers in the Bohai Rim region of China - A flux model considering small and medium-sized rivers X. Hou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176035
- Connecting hydrological modelling and forecasting from global to local scales: Perspectives from an international joint virtual workshop A. Dasgupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12880
- An asset-level analysis of financial tail risks under extreme weather events R. Kerkhofs et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/addf6f
- Can geomorphic flood descriptors coupled with machine learning models enhance in quantifying flood risks over data-scarce catchments? Development of a hybrid framework for Ganga basin (India) V. Tripathi & M. Mohanty https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33507-3
- Comprehensive Assessment of Large-Scale Regional Fluvial Flood Exposure Using Public Datasets: A Case Study from China X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13100357
- Effects of cryospheric hydrological processes on future flood inundation and the subsequent socioeconomic exposures in Central Asia N. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca491
- The Vulnerability and Resilience of Drinking Water Systems to Extreme Weather Events and Future Climate Change G. Howard et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-026-00524-y
- Varying flood exposure due to uncertain data of flood hazard and population distribution W. Shao et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae0fae
- On the right track of flood planning policy? Land uptake in Central-European floodplains (1990–2018) M. Dolejš et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104560
- Assessing open‐access digital elevation models for hydrological applications in a large scale plain: Drainage networks, shallow water bodies and vertical accuracy A. Golin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.6035
- Water Resources in Africa under Global Change: Monitoring Surface Waters from Space F. Papa et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-022-09700-9
- Integrating social vulnerability into high-resolution global flood risk mapping S. Fox et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47394-2
- Flood hazard potential reveals global floodplain settlement patterns L. Devitt et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38297-9
- Yomra Deresi Havzasının Taşkın Maruziyet Analizi O. Ertoğral & İ. Çiçek https://doi.org/10.21324/dacd.1725047
- Accelerated Settlement Expansion in High-Hazard Areas of the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna Delta Y. Ye & L. He https://doi.org/10.3390/w18091029
- Analysis of the fundamental differences between dam-forming landslides and all landslides H. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109665
- Global population datasets overestimate flood exposure in Sweden K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71330-5
- Population exposure predicts flood losses in Sweden K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-026-00194-8
- Flood Vulnerability Assessment Using Satellite Imagery Data E. Koliokosta https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2023.1112001
- Unknown risk: assessing refugee camp flood risk in Ethiopia M. Bernhofen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acd8d0
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 07 Jun 2026
Short summary
The use of different global datasets to calculate flood exposure can lead to differences in global flood exposure estimates. In this study, we use three global population datasets and a simple measure of a river’s flood susceptibility (based on the terrain alone) to explore how the choice of population data and the size of river represented in global flood models affect global and national flood exposure estimates.
The use of different global datasets to calculate flood exposure can lead to differences in...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint