Articles | Volume 21, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2829-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2829-2021
Research article
 | 
16 Sep 2021
Research article |  | 16 Sep 2021

Global flood exposure from different sized rivers

Mark V. Bernhofen, Mark A. Trigg, P. Andrew Sleigh, Christopher C. Sampson, and Andrew M. Smith

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on nhess-2021-102', Serena Ceola, 30 Apr 2021
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Mark Bernhofen, 23 Jul 2021
  • RC2: 'Comment on nhess-2021-102', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Jul 2021
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Mark Bernhofen, 23 Jul 2021

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (02 Aug 2021) by Kai Schröter
AR by Mark Bernhofen on behalf of the Authors (09 Aug 2021)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (12 Aug 2021) by Kai Schröter
Download
Short summary
The use of different global datasets to calculate flood exposure can lead to differences in global flood exposure estimates. In this study, we use three global population datasets and a simple measure of a river’s flood susceptibility (based on the terrain alone) to explore how the choice of population data and the size of river represented in global flood models affect global and national flood exposure estimates.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint