Articles | Volume 21, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-279-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-279-2021
Research article
 | 
25 Jan 2021
Research article |  | 25 Jan 2021

Comparing an insurer's perspective on building damages with modelled damages from pan-European winter windstorm event sets: a case study from Zurich, Switzerland

Christoph Welker, Thomas Röösli, and David N. Bresch

Viewed

Total article views: 3,396 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,419 921 56 3,396 65 56
  • HTML: 2,419
  • PDF: 921
  • XML: 56
  • Total: 3,396
  • BibTeX: 65
  • EndNote: 56
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Apr 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Apr 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,396 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,075 with geography defined and 321 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 26 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
How representative are local building insurers' claims to assess winter windstorm risk? In our case study of Zurich, we use a risk model for windstorm building damages and compare three different inputs: insurance claims and historical and probabilistic windstorm datasets. We find that long-term risk is more robustly assessed based on windstorm datasets than on claims data only. Our open-access method allows European building insurers to complement their risk assessment with modelling results.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint