Dear authors,
your paper has been revised by two referees: one suggested major, while the second suggested some minor changes. You provided an articulated reply in the open discussion. I think you should have a chance to propose a revised version of the work. Therefore I decided to reconsider this paper after major revisions.
Please note that this editorial decision does not guarantee that your paper will be accepted for final publication in NHESS. A decision will be made when the revised version will be available and evaluated.
Best regards
Paolo Tarolli

Dear authors,
your article has been further revised by 3 reviewers. I asked an additional reviewer, a well-known expert in this field, in order to have a more complete overview on your article. One reviewer reccomended to accept your work, but two reviewers still raised major criticalities. My recommendation is to check carefully these critical points, provide a suitable revision, and detailed response to each comment raised.
Please note that this editorial decision does not guarantee that your paper will be accepted for final publication in NHESS. A decision will be made when the revised version will be available and evaluated.
Best regards
Paolo Tarolli

Dear authors,
your article has been further checked by a reviewer who raised major issues in the previous review stage. The reviewer recognized the fact that your article has been improved a lot after the two review stages. However, again, she/he raised several points to fix. I suggest to check carefully the reviewer's comments and provide a suitable (and detailed) reply to these. I will give a final look at your reply and revised manuscript; then I will provide my final decision.
Best regards
Paolo Tarolli

Dear authors,
the latest changes you provided in the article met the reviewer's approval. Your paper is now ready for publication.
Best regards
Paolo Tarolli