Articles | Volume 20, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-859-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-859-2020
Research article
 | 
27 Mar 2020
Research article |  | 27 Mar 2020

Estimation of evapotranspiration by the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Penman–Monteith temperature (PMT) and Hargreaves–Samani (HS) models under temporal and spatial criteria – a case study in Duero basin (Spain)

Rubén Moratiel, Raquel Bravo, Antonio Saa, Ana M. Tarquis, and Javier Almorox

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (20 Jan 2020) by Jonathan Rizzi
AR by Ruben Moratiel on behalf of the Authors (05 Feb 2020)
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (06 Feb 2020) by Jonathan Rizzi
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (10 Feb 2020)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (17 Feb 2020)
RR by pankaj pandey (18 Feb 2020)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (18 Feb 2020) by Jonathan Rizzi
AR by Ruben Moratiel on behalf of the Authors (23 Feb 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
The estimation of ETo using temperature is particularly attractive in places where air humidity, wind speed and solar radiation data are not readily available. In this study we used, for the estimation of ETo, seven models against Penman–Monteith FAO 56 with temporal (annual and seasonal) and spatial perspective over Duero basin (Spain). The results of the tested models can be useful for adopting appropriate measures for efficient water management under the limitation of agrometeorological data.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint