Journal cover Journal topic
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 3.102
IF3.102
IF 5-year value: 3.284
IF 5-year
3.284
CiteScore value: 5.1
CiteScore
5.1
SNIP value: 1.37
SNIP1.37
IPP value: 3.21
IPP3.21
SJR value: 1.005
SJR1.005
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 90
Scimago H
index
90
h5-index value: 42
h5-index42
Download
Short summary
Flood risk management requires a realistic estimation of flood losses. However, the capacity of available flood damage models to depict real damages is questionable. With a joint effort of eight research groups, the objective of this study was to compare the performances of nine models for the estimation of flood damage to buildings. The comparison provided more objective insights on the transferability of the models and on the reliability of their estimations.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint
NHESS | Articles | Volume 20, issue 11
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2997–3017, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2997-2020
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2997–3017, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2997-2020

Research article 09 Nov 2020

Research article | 09 Nov 2020

Are flood damage models converging to “reality”? Lessons learnt from a blind test

Daniela Molinari et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,187 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
895 275 17 1,187 30 20 18
  • HTML: 895
  • PDF: 275
  • XML: 17
  • Total: 1,187
  • Supplement: 30
  • BibTeX: 20
  • EndNote: 18
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Feb 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Feb 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 935 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 915 with geography defined and 20 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 24 Jan 2021
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Flood risk management requires a realistic estimation of flood losses. However, the capacity of available flood damage models to depict real damages is questionable. With a joint effort of eight research groups, the objective of this study was to compare the performances of nine models for the estimation of flood damage to buildings. The comparison provided more objective insights on the transferability of the models and on the reliability of their estimations.
Citation
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint