Articles | Volume 20, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2997-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2997-2020
Research article
 | 
09 Nov 2020
Research article |  | 09 Nov 2020

Are flood damage models converging to “reality”? Lessons learnt from a blind test

Daniela Molinari, Anna Rita Scorzini, Chiara Arrighi, Francesca Carisi, Fabio Castelli, Alessio Domeneghetti, Alice Gallazzi, Marta Galliani, Frédéric Grelot, Patric Kellermann, Heidi Kreibich, Guilherme S. Mohor, Markus Mosimann, Stephanie Natho, Claire Richert, Kai Schroeter, Annegret H. Thieken, Andreas Paul Zischg, and Francesco Ballio

Viewed

Total article views: 3,810 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,376 1,372 62 3,810 136 64 53
  • HTML: 2,376
  • PDF: 1,372
  • XML: 62
  • Total: 3,810
  • Supplement: 136
  • BibTeX: 64
  • EndNote: 53
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Feb 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Feb 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,810 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,408 with geography defined and 402 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 27 May 2024
Download
Short summary
Flood risk management requires a realistic estimation of flood losses. However, the capacity of available flood damage models to depict real damages is questionable. With a joint effort of eight research groups, the objective of this study was to compare the performances of nine models for the estimation of flood damage to buildings. The comparison provided more objective insights on the transferability of the models and on the reliability of their estimations.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint