Dear authors,
your article has been revised by two reviewers who raised minor issues. You provided a detailed reply to the NHESS open discussion. I think you should improve the article following the suggestions by reviewers. Therefore I decided to reconsider this paper after minor revisions.
In submitting your revised version, please provide a detailed list of the changes made to the text and a detailed list of your responses to the reviewers’ comments.
Please note that this editorial decision does not guarantee that your paper will be accepted for final publication in NHESS. A decision will be made when the revised version will be available and evaluated by the Editor.
Best regards
Paolo Tarolli

Dear authors,
your paper has been revised by two referees: both indicated minor issues to fix. You provided an articulated and detailed reply in the open discussion.
Also a quick note from my side: I would suggest a better description (4-5 sentences at the end of the discussion, and then 1-2 sentences in the conclusions) of the implications of your study for natural hazards assessment and risk management of such study area in order to better meet the goals of our journal NHESS (that is not a pure "geomorphologic" journal).
Therefore I decided to reconsider this paper after minor revisions. In the resubmission, provide also a tracked manuscript and a reply to each comment raised.
Please note that this editorial decision does not guarantee that your paper will be accepted for final publication in NHESS. A decision will be made when the revised version will be available and evaluated.
Best regards
Paolo Tarolli

Dear authors,
you provided a suitable reply to the reviewers and my comments with useful changes in the text. The article is now ready for publication.
Best regards
Paolo Tarolli