Articles | Volume 15, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2511-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2511-2015
Research article
 | 
18 Nov 2015
Research article |  | 18 Nov 2015

Climate change adaptation frameworks: an evaluation of plans for coastal Suffolk, UK

J. Armstrong, R. Wilby, and R. J. Nicholls

Related authors

A geospatial database of coastal characteristics for erosion assessment of Europe’s coastal floodplains
Susan E. Hanson, Robert J. Nicholls, Floris R. Calkoen, Gonéri Le Cozannet, and Arjen P. Luijendijk
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2371,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2371, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
At-scale Model Output Statistics in mountain environments (AtsMOS v1.0)
Maximillian Van Wyk de Vries, Tom Matthews, L. Baker Perry, Nirakar Thapa, and Rob Wilby
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7629–7643, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7629-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7629-2024, 2024
Short summary
Climate-induced storminess forces major increases in future storm surge hazard in the South China Sea region
Melissa Wood, Ivan D. Haigh, Quan Quan Le, Hung Nghia Nguyen, Hoang Ba Tran, Stephen E. Darby, Robert Marsh, Nikolaos Skliris, Joël J.-M. Hirschi, Robert J. Nicholls, and Nadia Bloemendaal
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2475–2504, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2475-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2475-2023, 2023
Short summary
Hybrid forecasting: blending climate predictions with AI models
Louise J. Slater, Louise Arnal, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Annie Y.-Y. Chang, Simon Moulds, Conor Murphy, Grey Nearing, Guy Shalev, Chaopeng Shen, Linda Speight, Gabriele Villarini, Robert L. Wilby, Andrew Wood, and Massimiliano Zappa
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1865–1889, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023, 2023
Short summary
Sea-level rise in Venice: historic and future trends (review article)
Davide Zanchettin, Sara Bruni, Fabio Raicich, Piero Lionello, Fanny Adloff, Alexey Androsov, Fabrizio Antonioli, Vincenzo Artale, Eugenio Carminati, Christian Ferrarin, Vera Fofonova, Robert J. Nicholls, Sara Rubinetti, Angelo Rubino, Gianmaria Sannino, Giorgio Spada, Rémi Thiéblemont, Michael Tsimplis, Georg Umgiesser, Stefano Vignudelli, Guy Wöppelmann, and Susanna Zerbini
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2643–2678, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2643-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2643-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies, Socioeconomic and Management Aspects
Qualitative risk assessment of sensitive infrastructures at the local level: flooding and heavy rainfall
Alessa Truedinger, Joern Birkmann, Mark Fleischhauer, and Celso Ferreira
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2097–2113, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2097-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2097-2025, 2025
Short summary
Measuring extremes-driven direct biophysical impacts in agricultural drought damages
Mansi Nagpal, Jasmin Heilemann, Luis Samaniego, Bernd Klauer, Erik Gawel, and Christian Klassert
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2115–2135, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2115-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2115-2025, 2025
Short summary
Brief communication: Bridging the data gap – a call to enhance the representation of global coastal flood protection
Nicole van Maanen, Joël J.-F. G. De Plaen, Timothy Tiggeloven, Maria Luisa Colmenares, Philip J. Ward, Paolo Scussolini, and Elco Koks
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2075–2080, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2075-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2075-2025, 2025
Short summary
Disaster management following the great Kahramanmaraş earthquakes in 2023, Türkiye
Bektaş Sarı
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2031–2043, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2031-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2031-2025, 2025
Short summary
From insufficient rainfall to livelihoods: understanding the cascade of drought impacts and policy implications
Louise Cavalcante, David W. Walker, Sarra Kchouk, Germano Ribeiro Neto, Taís Maria Nunes Carvalho, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Wieke Pot, Art Dewulf, and Pieter R. van Oel
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1993–2005, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1993-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1993-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Adger, N. W., Arnell, N. W., and Tompkins, E. L.: Successful adaptation to climate change across scales, Global Environ. Change, 15, 77–86, 2005.
Adger, N. W., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, Wolf, L. O. N. J., and Wreford, A.: Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?, Climate Change, 93, 335–354, 2009.
Bader, D., Covey, C., Gutowski, W., Held, I., Kunkel, K., Miller, R., Tokmakian, R., and Zhang, M.: Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations, US Department of Energy Publications, 8, 1–6, 2008.
Brooks, N., Adger, W. N., and Kelly, P. M.: The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaption, Global Environ. Change, 15, 151–163, 2005.
Brown, C. and Wilby, R. L.: An alternate approach to assessing climate risks, Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 93, 401–402, 2012.
Download
Short summary
A criterion to categorise climate change adaptation frameworks is presented denoting characteristics of three key frameworks established in the literature: scenario–led, decision-centric and vulnerability–led. Applying the criterion, the usability of frameworks is examined in coastal Suffolk. Results indicate adaptation frameworks established in the literature are not utilised in isolation in everyday practice. In reality, hybrid approaches are utilised to overcome aspects of framework weakness.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint