Articles | Volume 15, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2511-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2511-2015
Research article
 | 
18 Nov 2015
Research article |  | 18 Nov 2015

Climate change adaptation frameworks: an evaluation of plans for coastal Suffolk, UK

J. Armstrong, R. Wilby, and R. J. Nicholls

Related authors

At-scale Model Output Statistics in mountain environments (AtsMOS v1.0)
Maximillian Van Wyk de Vries, Tom Matthews, L. Baker Perry, Nirakar Thapa, and Rob Wilby
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7629–7643, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7629-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7629-2024, 2024
Short summary
Climate-induced storminess forces major increases in future storm surge hazard in the South China Sea region
Melissa Wood, Ivan D. Haigh, Quan Quan Le, Hung Nghia Nguyen, Hoang Ba Tran, Stephen E. Darby, Robert Marsh, Nikolaos Skliris, Joël J.-M. Hirschi, Robert J. Nicholls, and Nadia Bloemendaal
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2475–2504, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2475-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2475-2023, 2023
Short summary
Hybrid forecasting: blending climate predictions with AI models
Louise J. Slater, Louise Arnal, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Annie Y.-Y. Chang, Simon Moulds, Conor Murphy, Grey Nearing, Guy Shalev, Chaopeng Shen, Linda Speight, Gabriele Villarini, Robert L. Wilby, Andrew Wood, and Massimiliano Zappa
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1865–1889, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023, 2023
Short summary
Sea-level rise in Venice: historic and future trends (review article)
Davide Zanchettin, Sara Bruni, Fabio Raicich, Piero Lionello, Fanny Adloff, Alexey Androsov, Fabrizio Antonioli, Vincenzo Artale, Eugenio Carminati, Christian Ferrarin, Vera Fofonova, Robert J. Nicholls, Sara Rubinetti, Angelo Rubino, Gianmaria Sannino, Giorgio Spada, Rémi Thiéblemont, Michael Tsimplis, Georg Umgiesser, Stefano Vignudelli, Guy Wöppelmann, and Susanna Zerbini
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2643–2678, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2643-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2643-2021, 2021
Short summary
Extreme floods of Venice: characteristics, dynamics, past and future evolution (review article)
Piero Lionello, David Barriopedro, Christian Ferrarin, Robert J. Nicholls, Mirko Orlić, Fabio Raicich, Marco Reale, Georg Umgiesser, Michalis Vousdoukas, and Davide Zanchettin
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2705–2731, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2705-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2705-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies, Socioeconomic and Management Aspects
Development of a regionally consistent and fully probabilistic earthquake risk model for Central Asia
Mario A. Salgado-Gálvez, Mario Ordaz, Benjamín Huerta, Osvaldo Garay, Carlos Avelar, Ettore Fagà, Mohsen Kohrangi, Paola Ceresa, Georgios Triantafyllou, and Ulugbek T. Begaliev
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3851–3868, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3851-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3851-2024, 2024
Short summary
Critical infrastructure resilience: a guide for building indicator systems based on a multi-criteria framework with a focus on implementable actions
Zhuyu Yang, Bruno Barroca, Ahmed Mebarki, Katia Laffréchine, Hélène Dolidon, and Lionel Lilas
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3723–3753, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3723-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3723-2024, 2024
Short summary
Where to start with climate-smart forest management? Climatic risk for forest-based mitigation
Natalie Piazza, Luca Malanchini, Edoardo Nevola, and Giorgio Vacchiano
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3579–3595, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3579-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3579-2024, 2024
Short summary
Dynamic response of pile–slab retaining wall structure under rockfall impact
Peng Zou, Gang Luo, Yuzhang Bi, and Hanhua Xu
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3497–3517, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3497-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3497-2024, 2024
Short summary
Urban growth and spatial segregation increase disaster risk: lessons learned from the 2023 disaster on the North Coast of São Paulo, Brazil
Cassiano Bastos Moroz and Annegret H. Thieken
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3299–3314, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3299-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3299-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Adger, N. W., Arnell, N. W., and Tompkins, E. L.: Successful adaptation to climate change across scales, Global Environ. Change, 15, 77–86, 2005.
Adger, N. W., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, Wolf, L. O. N. J., and Wreford, A.: Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?, Climate Change, 93, 335–354, 2009.
Bader, D., Covey, C., Gutowski, W., Held, I., Kunkel, K., Miller, R., Tokmakian, R., and Zhang, M.: Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations, US Department of Energy Publications, 8, 1–6, 2008.
Brooks, N., Adger, W. N., and Kelly, P. M.: The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaption, Global Environ. Change, 15, 151–163, 2005.
Brown, C. and Wilby, R. L.: An alternate approach to assessing climate risks, Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 93, 401–402, 2012.
Download
Short summary
A criterion to categorise climate change adaptation frameworks is presented denoting characteristics of three key frameworks established in the literature: scenario–led, decision-centric and vulnerability–led. Applying the criterion, the usability of frameworks is examined in coastal Suffolk. Results indicate adaptation frameworks established in the literature are not utilised in isolation in everyday practice. In reality, hybrid approaches are utilised to overcome aspects of framework weakness.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint