49 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Comparison of Cushioning Mechanisms between Cellular Glass and Gabions Subjected to Successive Boulder Impacts C. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001922
2. Deformation Behavior and Damage Assessment of Ground Reinforced Embankments Impacted by Multiple Medium-Energy Rockfalls L. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03497-8
3. Dynamic response of rock sheds to successive rockfall impacts using lightweight expanded clay aggregate (LECA) cushions: An experimental and numerical study H. Meree et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.105043
4. Eco-friendly recycled crushed glass for cushioning boulder impacts Y. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0200
5. Effects of particle shape on the cushioning mechanics of rock-filled gabions Y. Su & C. Choi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01080-x
6. A CASE STUDY: COST-BENEFIT AND RISK ANALYSES OF GABION WALL FOR ROCKFALL PROTECTION METHOD IN BOZKIR, TURKEY B. Fidan et al. https://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.1510650
7. Large-scale successive boulder impacts on a rigid barrier shielded by gabions C. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0073
8. Deformation, resistance characteristics, and scale effects of rockfall protection soil embankments under static loading Y. Oguri et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101634
9. Technogenic layering in iron ore pit dumps: formations, ordering, and geodynamic interaction with hostrock L. Osmachko & O. Soloviov https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2025.02.099
10. Efficiency assessment of existing rockfall protection embankments based on an impact strength criterion S. Lambert & B. Kister https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.06.008
11. A Method to Compute the Ultimate Displacements in Reinforced Earth Rockfall Protection Embankments: A Perspective for the Design S. Vigna et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-025-04801-4
12. A New Design Tool for Rockfall Risk Mitigation by Geosynthetic-Reinforced Embankments G. Dattola et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-04313-7
13. New light-weight concrete foam to absorb debris-flow-entrained boulder impact: Large-scale pendulum modelling Y. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105724
14. Influence of rock shape on rockfall trajectory and hazard analyses: Design of protective measures for a Himalayan slope in India S. Kundu & R. Bhowmik https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-025-02519-z
15. Towards realistic simulations of the impact dynamics of boulders on rock-filled gabion: Combined effects of rock shapes and their crushing strength Y. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106026
16. Discrete element modeling of rock-filled gabions under successive boulder impacts G. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106092
17. Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Reinforced Soil Wall Subjected to Impact Loading L. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02579-9
18. Economical Recycled Concrete Aggregates to Attenuate Successive Rockfall Impacts: Large-Scale Field Modeling Y. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03423-y
19. Theoretical study of rockfall impacts based on logistic curves Z. Guangcheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.06.001
20. Stress transfer mechanism of ground reinforcement embankments subjected to lateral rockfall impact L. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.12.002
21. Effects of particle size and cushioning thickness on the performance of rock-filled gabions used in protection against boulder impact Y. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0370
22. Numerical investigation of ground reinforced embankments: Structural geometry design L. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.01.006
23. Performance assessment of a protection embankment designed for a rockfall-prone slope along lesser Himalayas of Jammu and Kashmir, India S. Maheshwari & R. Bhowmik https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06959-6
24. Mechanical Performance of Gravelly Soil Stabilized with Recycled Polypropylene Fiber and Polyurethane P. Zuan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18131594
25. Dynamic analysis of rockfall impact on a protective structure via FEM-DEM coupling D. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06183-8
26. Performance of ethylene-vinyl acetate foam as cushioning material for rigid debris-resisting barriers C. Lam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-0987-z
27. Study on mechanical behavior of rockfall impacts on a shed slab based on experiment and SPH–FEM coupled method H. Zhong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.021
28. Safety Risk Analysis of a New Design of Basalt Fiber Gabion Slope Based on Improved 3D Discrete Element Method and Monitoring Data J. Dai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103645
29. Rockfall protection wall that can withstand multiple strikes without needing to be repaired J. Perera & N. Lam https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104476
30. Deformation Resistance of Prestressed Geosynthetics-Reinforced Soil Wall with a Buffer Layer Subjected to Impact of Rockfall S. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455423500591
31. DEM analysis of the dynamic responses of the gabion tunnel lining components subjected to boulder impact G. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2026.108229
32. Experimental and Analytical Investigation of a RC Wall with a Gabion Cushion Subjected to Boulder Impact J. Perera et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103823
33. Effects of rockfall shape on deformation performance of ground reinforced embankments subjected to lateral impact L. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.04.009
34. THE EFFECT OF ROCKFALL ROTATIONAL MOTION ON THE ENERGY ABSORPTION CHARACTERISTICS AND ROCKFALL CAPTURE PERFORMANCE OF ROCKFALL PROTECTION SOIL EMBANKMENTS Y. OGURI et al. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejj.25-00221
35. Analysis of the dynamic response of tunnel lining component constructed with the gabion under rockfall impact: Test and DEM investigation H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2026.105880
36. Design and optimisation of a protective device for bridge piers against debris flow impact S. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01793-z
37. Seismic rockfall risk assessments and mitigation strategies for transportation infrastructure in high-risk regions K. Eze et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-025-00182-x
38. Full-scale experiment and numerical studies on vertical impact characteristics of reinforced embankment B. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.08.009
39. An experimental investigation of the response of slender protective structures to rockfall impacts S. Lambert et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0147
40. Numerical Simulation of Rockfall Protection Embankments in Natural Soil S. Vigna et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13120368
41. FRACTURE BEHAVIOR OF ROCKFALL PROTECTION SOIL EMBANKMENT WITH SANDY SOIL UNDER IMPACT AND STATIC LOADING A. KIMURA et al. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejj.23-00253
42. Environment-Friendly Recycled Concrete Aggregates to Attenuate Successive Rockfall Impacts: Large-Scale Field Modelling Y. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4136985
43. Semi-Automatic Determination of Rockfall Trajectories A. Volkwein & J. Klette https://doi.org/10.3390/s141018187
44. The effects of gravel cushion particle size and thickness on the coefficient of restitution in rockfall impacts C. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1811-2018
45. A multi-parametric model for calculating the impact force exerted on cantilevered structures due to the collision of boulder within debris flow Y. Chaoping et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04407-8
46. Load distribution of rockfall impact onto rock shed through sand cushion X. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04484-9
47. Extremely Energetic Rockfalls F. De Blasio et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004327
48. Experimental and Numerical Impact Responses of an Innovative Rockfall Protection Structure Made of Articulated Concrete Blocks A. Furet et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02957-x
49. Gabions: evaluation of potential as low-cost roadside barriers G. Amato et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2014.949038