22 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Use of GIS in assessing building vulnerability for landslide hazard in The Nilgiris, Western Ghats, India E. Thennavan et al. 10.1007/s11069-016-2232-1
2. A Systemic Approach to Evaluate the Flood Vulnerability for an Urban Study Case in Southern Italy R. Albano et al. 10.4236/jwarp.2014.64037
3. A multi-scale risk assessment for tephra fallout and airborne concentration from multiple Icelandic volcanoes – Part 2: Vulnerability and impact C. Scaini et al. 10.5194/nhess-14-2289-2014
4. A GIS-based model to estimate flood consequences and the degree of accessibility and operability of strategic emergency response structures in urban areas R. Albano et al. 10.5194/nhess-14-2847-2014
5. Potential Landslide Vulnerability Zonation Using Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and GIS Technique of Upper Rangit Catchment Area, West Sikkim, India S. Pal et al. 10.1007/s12524-019-01009-2
6. Assessing the fluvial system resilience of the river Bacchiglione to point sources of pollution in Northeast Italy: a novel Water Resilience Index (WRI) approach D. Mirauda et al. 10.1007/s11356-021-13157-5
7. Multi-period vulnerability analysis of power grids under multiple outages: An AC-based bilevel optimization approach A. Abedi & F. Romerio 10.1016/j.ijcip.2020.100365
8. The interplay between structural and systemic vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic: migrant agricultural workers in informal settlements in Southern Italy S. Tagliacozzo et al. 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1857230
9. Landslide susceptibility assessment by using a neuro-fuzzy model: a case study in the Rupestrian heritage rich area of Matera F. Sdao et al. 10.5194/nhess-13-395-2013
10. A GIS-based methodology for the estimation of potential volcanic damage and its application to Tenerife Island, Spain C. Scaini et al. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.04.005
11. Review of major approaches to analyze vulnerability in power system A. Abedi et al. 10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.019
12. An integrative approach of the physical-based stability index mapping with the maximum entropy stochastic model for risk analysis of mass movements H. Memarian et al. 10.1007/s10668-022-02165-1
13. Modeling the vulnerability of an industrial system: An ideal system of a simplified reactor vessel W. Shi et al. 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.06.001
14. Mass movements inventory map of the Rubbio stream catchment (Basilicata – South Italy) M. Conforti et al. 10.1080/17445647.2014.924038
15. From spatio-temporal landslide susceptibility to landslide risk forecast T. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101765
16. A mathematical approach for assessing landslide vulnerability H. Martinez-Carvajal et al. 10.15446/esrj.v22n4.68553
17. Denudation processes and landforms map of the Camastra River catchment (Basilicata – South Italy) M. Conforti et al. 10.1080/17445647.2013.804797
18. Measuring and understanding the microeconomic resilience of businesses to lifeline service interruptions due to natural disasters N. Graveline & M. Grémont 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.05.012
19. Twenty years of European and international research on vulnerability: A multi-faceted concept for better dealing with evolving risk landscapes G. Limongi & A. Galderisi 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102451
20. Quantitative landslide risk analysis in the Hashtchin area (NW-Iran) R. Talaei & S. Samadov 10.1080/19648189.2016.1229224
21. A Comprehensive Assessment of Exposure and Vulnerabilities in Multi-Hazard Urban Environments: A Key Tool for Risk-Informed Planning Strategies A. Galderisi & G. Limongi 10.3390/su13169055
22. Village relocation as solution of the landslide risk, is it always the right choice? The case study of Cavallerizzo ghost village (Calabria, southern Italy) F. Ietto et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103267