28 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Use of GIS in assessing building vulnerability for landslide hazard in The Nilgiris, Western Ghats, India E. Thennavan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2232-1
2. A Systemic Approach to Evaluate the Flood Vulnerability for an Urban Study Case in Southern Italy R. Albano et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2014.64037
3. A multi-scale risk assessment for tephra fallout and airborne concentration from multiple Icelandic volcanoes – Part 2: Vulnerability and impact C. Scaini et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2289-2014
4. A GIS-based model to estimate flood consequences and the degree of accessibility and operability of strategic emergency response structures in urban areas R. Albano et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2847-2014
5. Multi-hazard risk assessment analysis in La Palma: an approach for risk mitigation N. Martín-Raya et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-024-00296-3
6. Between global risk reduction goals, scientific–technical capabilities and local realities: a modular approach for user-centric multi-risk assessment E. Schoepfer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4631-2024
7. Potential Landslide Vulnerability Zonation Using Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and GIS Technique of Upper Rangit Catchment Area, West Sikkim, India S. Pal et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-019-01009-2
8. Assessing the fluvial system resilience of the river Bacchiglione to point sources of pollution in Northeast Italy: a novel Water Resilience Index (WRI) approach D. Mirauda et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13157-5
9. Multi-hazard Risk Unveiled: Pioneering Techniques for Comprehensive Risk Analysis and Mitigation P. Mahato et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-024-00407-8
10. Multi-period vulnerability analysis of power grids under multiple outages: An AC-based bilevel optimization approach A. Abedi & F. Romerio https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2020.100365
11. The interplay between structural and systemic vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic: migrant agricultural workers in informal settlements in Southern Italy S. Tagliacozzo et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1857230
12. Landslide susceptibility assessment by using a neuro-fuzzy model: a case study in the Rupestrian heritage rich area of Matera F. Sdao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-395-2013
13. A GIS-based methodology for the estimation of potential volcanic damage and its application to Tenerife Island, Spain C. Scaini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.04.005
14. Review of major approaches to analyze vulnerability in power system A. Abedi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.019
15. An integrative approach of the physical-based stability index mapping with the maximum entropy stochastic model for risk analysis of mass movements H. Memarian et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02165-1
16. Modeling the vulnerability of an industrial system: An ideal system of a simplified reactor vessel W. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.06.001
17. Mass movements inventory map of the Rubbio stream catchment (Basilicata – South Italy) M. Conforti et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2014.924038
18. From spatio-temporal landslide susceptibility to landslide risk forecast T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101765
19. A mathematical approach for assessing landslide vulnerability H. Martinez-Carvajal et al. https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v22n4.68553
20. Denudation processes and landforms map of the Camastra River catchment (Basilicata – South Italy) M. Conforti et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2013.804797
21. Towards managing vulnerability. A new model of systemic vulnerability I. Armaș et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105378
22. Measuring and understanding the microeconomic resilience of businesses to lifeline service interruptions due to natural disasters N. Graveline & M. Grémont https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.05.012
23. From static to dynamic: Conceptual and operational developments of vulnerability I. Armaș & A. Albulescu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.112070
24. Twenty years of European and international research on vulnerability: A multi-faceted concept for better dealing with evolving risk landscapes G. Limongi & A. Galderisi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102451
25. Quantitative landslide risk analysis in the Hashtchin area (NW-Iran) R. Talaei & S. Samadov https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2016.1229224
26. A Comprehensive Assessment of Exposure and Vulnerabilities in Multi-Hazard Urban Environments: A Key Tool for Risk-Informed Planning Strategies A. Galderisi & G. Limongi https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169055
27. Village relocation as solution of the landslide risk, is it always the right choice? The case study of Cavallerizzo ghost village (Calabria, southern Italy) F. Ietto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103267
28. Decoupling urban and non-urban landslides for susceptibility mapping in transitional landscapes: a case study from Southwestern Constantine, Algeria Z. Matougui et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4629-2025