236 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. History, causes, and trend of floods in the U.S.: a review R. Abegaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06791-y
2. Urban flood impact assessment: A state-of-the-art review M. Hammond et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2013.857421
3. Development and Evaluation of Automatic Discharges Measurement Technology for Small Stream Monitoring T. Cheong et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.6.347
4. Development of a novel hybrid multi-boosting neural network model for spatial prediction of urban flood H. Darabi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1920629
5. 1935 Sella Zerbino Dam-Break Case Revisited: A New Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis G. Petaccia & L. Natale https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001760
6. Impact of urban drainage system malfunctions on pluvial flooding – Peri-urban study site in Austria F. Funke et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102592
7. Assessment of Coastal Compound Flooding in Tropical Catchment: Saltwater Creek Catchment in Australia S. Gurung et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091898
8. Flood loss models for residential buildings, based on the 2013 Colorado floods D. Deniz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2615-3
9. Modelo analítico para el cálculo de distribuciones de velocidad laterales en secciones tipo potencial-ley F. Sánchez-Romero et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/23863781.2018.1442189
10. Flood risk perception and adaptation capacity: a contribution to the socio-hydrology debate S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3183-2017
11. AI-Enhanced Coastal Flood Risk Assessment: A Real-Time Web Platform with Multi-Source Integration and Chesapeake Bay Case Study P. Magoulick https://doi.org/10.3390/w17152231
12. Ice dices for monitoring stream surface velocity F. Tauro & S. Grimaldi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2016.09.001
13. Integrated remote sensing imagery and two-dimensional hydraulic modeling approach for impact evaluation of flood on crop yields H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.001
14. A first collective validation of global fluvial flood models for major floods in Nigeria and Mozambique M. Bernhofen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae014
15. Multi-vulnerability analysis for flash flood risk management K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2296-y
16. Damage assessment in Braunsbach 2016: data collection and analysis for an improved understanding of damaging processes during flash floods J. Laudan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-2163-2017
17. Understanding flood risk in the context of community resilience modeling for the built environment: research needs and trends O. Nofal & J. van de Lindt https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2020.1722546
18. A review of multiple natural hazards and risks in Germany H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1265-6
19. Multivariate pluvial flood damage models L. Van Ootegem et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.05.005
20. Evaluating the Impact of Digital Elevation Models on Urban Flood Modeling: A Comprehensive Analysis of Flood Inundation, Hazard Mapping, and Damage Estimation Z. Zandsalimi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-03862-4
21. Flood risk assessment in Ténès city (Algeria) using land cover based on machine learning methods and Pléiades tri-stereo images Z. Narimane et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.12.036
22. Use of fluid structure interaction technique for flash flood impact assessment of structural components S. Kankanamge et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12581
23. Adaptive Short-Term Flood Defense Deployment Planning M. Ni & T. Erfani https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001551
24. A Vulnerability‐Based, Bottom‐up Assessment of Future Riverine Flood Risk Using a Modified Peaks‐Over‐Threshold Approach and a Physically Based Hydrologic Model J. Knighton et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021036
25. Development of damage curves for buildings near La Rochelle during storm Xynthia based on insurance claims and hydrodynamic simulations M. Diaz Loaiza et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-345-2022
26. A Bayesian network approach for multi-sectoral flood damage assessment and multi-scenario analysis R. Harris et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2022.100410
27. Rapid flood inundation mapping by integrating deep learning-based image super-resolution with coarse-grid hydrodynamic modeling W. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2025.2481115
28. Simplified automatic prediction of the level of damage to similar buildings affected by river flood in a specific area D. Marín-García et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104251
29. A comprehensive review on structural tsunami countermeasures J. Oetjen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05367-y
30. Advancing flood damage modeling for coastal Alabama residential properties: A multivariable machine learning approach M. Museru et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167872
31. A conceptual flood model based on cellular automata for probabilistic risk applications. M. Torres et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105530
32. A review of flood damage analysis for a building structure and contents M. Marvi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03941-w
33. Analysis of flow characteristics around islands due to semi-diurnal currents in the Han River, Korea I. Seo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0237-4
34. Estimating Tsunami-Induced Building Damage through Fragility Functions: Critical Review and Research Needs I. Charvet et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2017.00036
35. Beyond flood hazard. Mapping the loss probability of pedestrians to improve risk estimation and communication T. Lazzarin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168718
36. Flood risk assessment of Srinagar city in Jammu and Kashmir, India A. Alam et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-02-2017-0012
37. Using hydro‐morphological assessment parameters to estimate the flood‐induced vulnerability of watercourses ‐ a methodological approach across three spatial scales in Germany and the Czech Republic S. Garack & R. Ortlepp https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3921
38. Enhanced risk mapping for hurricane surge losses using synthesized probabilistic and machine learning models M. Habibnia & J. van de Lindt https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105523
39. A Quantitative Flood-Related Building Damage Evaluation Method Using Airborne LiDAR Data and 2-D Hydraulic Model D. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11050987
40. Study on Influencing Factors of Flood Damage to Single Houses using Field Survey Data C. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.7.535
41. A conceptual model of people's vulnerability to floods L. Milanesi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016172
42. Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Hydrometric Analysis for Assessing and Mitigating Building Vulnerability to Flash Flood Risks M. Wahba et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16030434
43. Novel approach to the derivation of dam breach parameters in 2D hydrodynamic modeling of earthquake induced dam failures P. Peramuna et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171505
44. Transferability of machine-learning-based modeling frameworks across flood events for hindcasting maximum river water depths in coastal watersheds M. Pakdehi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3537-2024
45. An integrated web framework for HAZUS-MH flood loss estimation analysis E. Yildirim & I. Demir https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03738-6
46. ‘How would an extreme flood have behaved if flood protection works were built?’ the case of the disastrous flash flood of November 2017 in Mandra, Attica, Greece G. Mitsopoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2022.2103002
47. Statistical characterization of flow field structure in evolving braided gravel beds D. Mirauda et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2017.10.004
48. Simulating the future flood events and their impacts on critical infrastructure in Srinagar: a Himalayan urban centre N. Ali et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07129-y
49. Horizontal evacuation dynamics of pedestrians during urban flooding: Insights from straight-corridor experiments C. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2026.105521
50. Structural Damage Prediction in a High-Velocity Urban Dam-Break Flood: Field-Scale Assessment of Predictive Skill H. Gallegos et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000427
51. High-resolution flood hazard mapping based on nonstationary frequency analysis: case study of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam L. Binh et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1581363
52. Flood risk and adaptation strategies under climate change and urban expansion: A probabilistic analysis using global data S. Muis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.068
53. Flood damage curves: new insights from the 2010 flood in Veneto, Italy A. Scorzini & E. Frank https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12163
54. Comparison of thermal, salt and dye tracing to estimate shallow flow velocities: Novel triple-tracer approach J. Abrantes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.048
55. Multi-Variate Analyses of Flood Loss in Can Tho City, Mekong Delta D. Chinh et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8010006
56. ReAFFIRM: Real-time Assessment of Flash Flood Impacts – a Regional high-resolution Method J. Ritter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105375
57. Testing the impact of at‐source stormwater management on urban flooding through a coupling of network and overland flow models M. Burns et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1078
58. Systematic numerical analysis of the hydraulic parameters responsible for critical flows in anthropogenically modified mountain channels for flood analysis and mitigation C. Hauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.13056
59. How useful are complex flood damage models? K. Schröter et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014396
60. Residential building and sub-building level flood damage analysis using simple and complex models R. Paulik et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06756-1
61. Comparative analyses of flood damage models in three Asian countries: towards a regional flood risk modelling A. Komolafe et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9716-3
62. Predictive Analysis of the Building Damage From the 2011 Great East Japan Tsunami Using Decision Tree Classification Related Algorithms K. Saengtabtim et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3060114
63. Investigation of pluvial flash flood loads on overpasses for the city of Montreal O. Ziya et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44327-025-00172-1
64. A review of damage-reducing measures to manage fluvial flood risks in a changing climate H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9629-5
65. A rapid flood inundation model for hazard mapping based on least squares support vector machine regression M. Bermúdez et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12522
66. A novel expert opinion-based approach to compute estimations of flood damage to property in dense urban environments. Barcelona case study E. Martínez-Gomariz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126244
67. Impact of flood hazards on pavement performance D. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1508844
68. Economic and Environmental Evaluation of a Single-Story Steel Building in Its Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Analysis S. Vela et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114638
69. Characterization of damages in buildings after floods in Vega Baja County (Spain) in 2019. The case study of Almoradí municipality R. Moya Barbera et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03004
70. Urban flood hazard mapping using a hydraulic–GIS combined model B. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03850-7
71. Exploring the impact of urbanization on flood characteristics with the SCS-TRITON method H. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06324-z
72. Coastal flood risk to European surface transport infrastructure at different global warming levels K. Nawarat et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02510-y
73. Lessons learned from past ice-jam floods concerning the challenges of flood mapping K. Lindenschmidt et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2018.1439496
74. Collaborative Modeling With Fine‐Resolution Data Enhances Flood Awareness, Minimizes Differences in Flood Perception, and Produces Actionable Flood Maps B. Sanders et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001391
75. A new framework for flood damage assessment considering the within-event time evolution of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability T. Lazzarin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128687
76. Impact of flooding events on buried infrastructures: a review R. Abegaz et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1357741
77. Investigation of the flash flood event caused by a massive rock–ice avalanche in the Himalayan river valleys of Rishiganga and Dhauliganga, Uttarakhand, through hydrodynamic modeling perspectives G. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-05972-5
78. Key Drivers of Flash Flood Damage to Private Households D. Rodríguez Castro et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70088
79. Evaluating the Effects of Inundation Duration and Velocity on Selection of Flood Management Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making E. Ahmadisharaf et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0956-4
80. Capturing flood-risk dynamics with a coupled agent-based and hydraulic modelling framework T. Michaelis et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1750617
81. Measurement Approach to Develop Flood-Based Damage Fragilities for Residential Buildings Following Repeat Inundation Events P. Shane Crawford et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001219
82. Quantitative flood hazard assessment methods: A review A. Maranzoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12855
83. Damage Curves Derived from Hurricane Ike in the West of Galveston Bay Based on Insurance Claims and Hydrodynamic Simulations C. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-023-00524-8
84. Remote sensing-based 2D hydrodynamic modeling and assessment of the 2014 flood in the Jhelum river basin R. Mansha et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-026-02724-9
85. Flooding in the urban fringes: Analysis of flood inundation and hazard levels within the informal settlement of Kibera in Nairobi, Kenya B. Juma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2023.103499
86. Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales H. de Moel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9654-z
87. Detention Ponds for Managing Flood Risk due to Increased Imperviousness: Case Study in an Urbanizing Catchment of India S. Sahoo & S. Pekkat https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000271
88. The impact of flooding on road transport: A depth-disruption function M. Pregnolato et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.020
89. Artificial Intelligence Methodologies Applied to Prompt Pluvial Flood Estimation and Prediction D. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123552
90. An Efficient Modeling Approach for Probabilistic Assessments of Present-Day and Future Fluvial Flooding H. Ngo et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2022.798618
91. Assessing Flood Risk Dynamics in Southern Laos: A Comparative Analysis of HEC-RAS, Empirical and Physically Based Froude Number Models along the Xekaman River K. PHOMMAVONG et al. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345748125500137
92. Effects of spatial planning on future flood risks in urban environments A. Mustafa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.090
93. Data for critical infrastructure network modelling of natural hazard impacts: Needs and influence on model characteristics R. Schotten et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2024.01.002
94. Quantifying hazard resilience by modeling infrastructure recovery as a resource-constrained project scheduling problem T. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2285-2024
95. Tsunami inundation and flow velocity within a partially sheltered structural array Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2024.2380149
96. Fast arrival-time modelling of dike breach floods for effective disaster management L. Besseling et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100565
97. Low cost, multiscale and multi-sensor application for flooded area mapping D. Giordan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1493-2018
98. Estimating Residential Property Loss Reduction from a Proposed Coastal Barrier System in the Houston-Galveston Region K. Atoba et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000297
99. Urban micro-scale flood risk estimation with parsimonious hydraulic modelling and census data C. Arrighi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1375-2013
100. Flood damage assessment model of industrial sectors in a Megacity: Derivation from business survey data in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region S. Darnkachatarn & Y. Kajitani https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105221
101. Integrated modeling of 2D urban surface and 1D sewer hydrodynamic processes and flood risk assessment of people and vehicles B. Dong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154098
102. Innovative Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of Urban Areas against Flood Events: Prognosis of Structural Damage with a New Approach Considering Flow Velocity H. Maiwald et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14182793
103. Climate change and river floods in the European Union: Socio-economic consequences and the costs and benefits of adaptation R. Rojas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.006
104. Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of the HAZUS-MH Flood Model E. Tate et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000167
105. Framework for stochastic urban flood hazard mapping using coupled and industry-standard hydrologic and hydraulic models S. Abedin & B. MacVicar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106632
106. A multi-step assessment framework for optimization of flood mitigation strategies in transportation networks N. Zhang & A. Alipour https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102439
107. Approach for evaluating inundation risks in urban drainage systems Z. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.025
108. Simulation of flash flood peaks in a small and steep catchment using rain‐on‐grid technique N. Godara et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12898
109. The effect of flooding on mental health: Lessons learned for building resilience S. Foudi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020435
110. Flood Management, Characterization and Vulnerability Analysis Using an Integrated RS-GIS and 2D Hydrodynamic Modelling Approach: The Case of Deg Nullah, Pakistan I. Ahmad et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092138
111. Quantifying the effect of autonomous adaptation to global river flood projections: application to future flood risk assessments Y. Kinoshita et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9401
112. Assessing the tsunami mitigation effectiveness of the planned Banda Aceh Outer Ring Road (BORR), Indonesia A. Suppasri et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-299-2019
113. Can the 2D shallow water equations model flow intrusion into buildings during urban floods? B. Dewals et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129231
114. A Seismic Approach to Flood Detection and Characterization in Upland Catchments M. Dietze et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100170
115. Vulnerability of the accessibility to grocery shopping in the event of flooding S. Wiśniewski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102510
116. Flood and Tsunami Damage Indices Based on Remotely Sensed Data: An Application to Indonesia E. Skoufias et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000325
117. A new approach to flood vulnerability assessment for historic buildings in England V. Stephenson & D. D'Ayala https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1035-2014
118. Quantitative evaluation of urban flooding originating from multiple sources using flood risk indices E. Shin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105866
119. Investigation of Non-Darcy Flow for Fine Grained Materials W. Ovalle-Villamil & I. Sasanakul https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0620-x
120. UAVs for Hydrologic Scopes: Application of a Low-Cost UAV to Estimate Surface Water Velocity by Using Three Different Image-Based Methods P. Koutalakis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3010014
121. Glacier–glacial lake changes and modeling glacial lake outburst flood in Upper Ganga Basin, India M. Rawat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01512-5
122. Spatial and temporal changes of social flood vulnerability in municipalities of Slovakia M. Vojtek et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2026.2616992
123. Estimating flood damage to railway infrastructure – the case study of the March River flood in 2006 at the Austrian Northern Railway P. Kellermann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2485-2015
124. Multi-variate flood damage assessment: a tree-based data-mining approach B. Merz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-53-2013
125. A Consistent Approach for Probabilistic Residential Flood Loss Modeling in Europe S. Lüdtke et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026213
126. Quantifying the potential benefits of risk-mitigation strategies on future flood losses in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal C. Mesta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-711-2023
127. Assessing the impact of climate change on fluvial flood losses in urban areas: a case study of Pamplona (Spain) E. Soriano et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2023.2246452
128. Assessing structural resilience of masonry chamber-housed substations subject to flood flow and debris impact W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-025-02347-6
129. Flood damage functions based on a single physics- and data-based impact parameter that jointly accounts for water depth and velocity T. Lazzarin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127485
130. A hydro‐economic modelling framework for flood damage estimation and the role of riparian vegetation N. Kourgialas & G. Karatzas https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9256
131. Empirical flash flood vulnerability functions for residential buildings C. Arrighi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2696-1
132. Flood impact on urban transport networks considering the flooding propagation Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127972
133. A numerical approach to understand the responses of passenger vehicles moving through floodwaters E. Al‐Qadami et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12828
134. Event-based approach for probabilistic flood risk assessment M. Torres et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2013.847844
135. Building performance in dam-break flow – an experimental study L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2018.1433862
136. The object-specific flood damage database HOWAS 21 P. Kellermann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2503-2020
137. Analysis of Inundation Flow Characteristics and Risk Assessment in a Subway Model Using Flow Simulations J. Shin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14178096
138. An assessment of mangrove restoration contribution for compound flood risk reduction in built estuary area based on a hydrodynamic model M. Kusuma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100295
139. Is flow velocity important in tsunami empirical fragility modeling? R. De Risi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.12.015
140. Towards multi-variable tsunami damage modeling for coastal roads: Insights from the application of explainable machine learning to the 2011 Great East Japan Event M. Di Bacco et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105856
141. Proportional loss functions for debris flow events C. Rheinberger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2147-2013
142. Assessment of microscale economic flood losses in urban and agricultural areas: case study of the Santa Bárbara River, Ecuador J. Pinos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04084-8
143. On the Exploitation of Remote Sensing Technologies for the Monitoring of Coastal and River Delta Regions Q. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102384
144. Key design considerations for flood risk pooling facilities at the sub-national level K. Pillay https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2024.100671
145. Securing Home Health Care structures facing forecastable natural disasters: A new tool to regulate between evacuation and adaptive home support services H. Barkaoui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.479
146. Probabilistic life-cycle cost-benefit analysis of portfolios of buildings under flood hazard Y. Dong & D. Frangopol https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.063
147. Conceptual and Analytical Framework as Flood Risk Mapping Subsidy L. Batista & A. Ribeiro Neto https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards3030020
148. Potential Impacts of Sea-Level Rise and Land-Use Change on Special Flood Hazard Areas and Associated Risks D. Habete & C. Ferreira https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000262
149. Damage functions for transport infrastructure N. Habermann & R. Hedel https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-09-2017-0052
150. Flood vulnerability assessment of residential buildings by explicit damage process modelling R. Custer & K. Nishijima https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1725-7
151. Flood Risk Reduction from Agricultural Best Management Practices F. Antolini et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12812
152. Contribution of insurance data to cost assessment of coastal flood damage to residential buildings: insights gained from Johanna (2008) and Xynthia (2010) storm events C. André et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2003-2013
153. Sampling‐Based Methods for Uncertainty Propagation in Flood Modeling Under Multiple Uncertain Inputs: Finding Out the Most Efficient Choice M. Hajihassanpour et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR034011
154. Flooding: Contributing factors to residential flood damage in Canada B. Deschamps et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105348
155. A probabilistic approach to estimating residential losses from different flood types D. Paprotny et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04413-x
156. Uncertainty in flood risk assessment of linear structures: Why correlation matters E. Storrøsten et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130442
157. Review article: Physical vulnerability database for critical infrastructure hazard risk assessments – a systematic review and data collection S. Nirandjan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4341-2024
158. Surface water floods in Switzerland: what insurance claim records tell us about the damage in space and time D. Bernet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1659-2017
159. Rapid spatio-temporal flood modelling via hydraulics-based graph neural networks R. Bentivoglio et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4227-2023
160. Flood risk assessment of the European road network K. van Ginkel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1011-2021
161. Assessment of tangible coastal inundation damage related to critical infrastructure and buildings: The case of Mauritius Island M. Sadien et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104909
162. A model taxonomy for flood fragility and vulnerability assessment of buildings C. Galasso et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101985
163. A Framework Proposal for Regional-Scale Flood-Risk Assessment of Cultural Heritage Sites and Application to the Castile and León Region (Central Spain) J. Garrote et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020329
164. Exploring spatial relationships between stream channel features, water depths and flow velocities during flash floods using HEC-GeoRAS and Geographic Information Systems M. Leal et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-1971-z
165. The potential of open-access data for flood estimations: uncovering inundation hotspots in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, through a normalized flood severity index L. Scheiber et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2313-2023
166. Flood Risk Impact Factor for Comparatively Evaluating the Main Causes that Contribute to Flood Risk in Urban Drainage Areas M. Morita https://doi.org/10.3390/w6020253
167. Effectiveness of Nature-Based Solutions on Pluvial Flood Hazard Mitigation: The Case Study of the City of Eindhoven (The Netherlands) S. Costa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10030024
168. DEM Resolution Effects on Coastal Flood Vulnerability Assessment: Deterministic and Probabilistic Approach M. Fereshtehpour & M. Karamouz https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022318
169. A flood of disaster response challenges M. Dietze & U. Ozturk https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm0617
170. Flood Management Strategies in Frequent and Small Scale Events: Lessons Learned from Amarante (Portugal) F. Tedim & S. Carvalho https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-010-0024-3
171. A complex network approach to quantifying flood resilience in high-density coastal urban areas: A case study of Macau R. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105335
172. A synergistic approach towards understanding flood risks over coastal multi-hazard environments: Appraisal of bivariate flood risk mapping through flood hazard, and socio-economic-cum-physical vulnerability dimensions D. Thakur & M. Mohanty https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166423
173. Performance of low impact development techniques in flood hazard mitigation in a closed urbanised catchment for extreme precipitation events G. da Silva Diniz et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2024.2397785
174. Stability analysis of riverfront facility on inundated floodplain based on flow characteristic C. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12233
175. Flow monitoring with a camera: a case study on a flood event in the Tiber River F. Tauro et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-5082-5
176. Predicting building damage from dam failure using fragility curves R. Coombs https://doi.org/10.1680/jdare.18.00010
177. Flood propagation modeling with the Local Inertia Approximation: Theoretical and numerical analysis of its physical limitations L. Cozzolino et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103422
178. Berücksichtigung der Fließgeschwindigkeit bei Hochwasser‐Schadensmodellen H. Maiwald & J. Schwarz https://doi.org/10.1002/bate.200910056
179. Assessing flash flood vulnerability using a multi-vulnerability approach K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160708004
180. Low‐Probability Flood Risk Modeling for New York City J. Aerts et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12008
181. Modelling flood losses of micro-businesses in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam A. Buch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2437-2025
182. Adaptability and transferability of flood loss functions in residential areas H. Cammerer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3063-2013
183. Analysis of Flood Hazard Alteration: Cascading Effects of Earthquake on Stormwater Collection Network M. Marvi & D. Linders https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000556
184. Multi-scale hydraulic graph neural networks for flood modelling R. Bentivoglio et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-335-2025
185. FLOOD-DEPTH-ML: Machine learning-driven python application for estimation of urban flood depths through submerged vehicles detection M. Mishra & R. Albano https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.109495
186. Testing empirical and synthetic flood damage models: the case of Italy M. Amadio et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-661-2019
187. Enhancement of roadway pavement resilience to flooding: impact assessment and mitigation strategies X. Chen & H. Wang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.104946
188. INSYDE: a synthetic, probabilistic flood damage model based on explicit cost analysis F. Dottori et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2577-2016
189. Examining direct and indirect flood damages in residential and business sectors through an empirical lens S. Kabirzad et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2024.202
190. Physical vulnerability assessment to flash floods using an indicator‐based methodology based on building properties and flow parameters M. Leal et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12712
191. A systemic method for evaluating the potential impacts of floods on network infrastructures J. Eleutério et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-983-2013
192. Probabilistic functionality assessment of road networks for medical emergency vehicles during flooding K. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08005-z
193. A GIS-Based Flooding Indicator for Heavy Rainfall Hazards Along the German Railway Network: Case Study Nordrhein-Westfalen F. von den Driesch & S. Szymczak https://doi.org/10.3390/w18131533
194. Flooding and mobility: a polish analysis S. Wiśniewski et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2020.1810608
195. Sensitivity of flood loss estimates to building representation and flow depth attribution methods in micro-scale flood modelling M. Bermúdez & A. Zischg https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3270-7
196. A comparison of the hydrodynamic characteristics of surface runoff generated by flash floods in geologically different areas of the Bohemian Massif (crystalline rocks) and the western Carpathians (flysch) V. Spálovský et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2022-0009
197. Spatiotemporal flood risk assessment of underground space considering flood intensity and escape route E. Shin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04888-2
198. Modelling Flood Losses to Buildings: Relationship between Room Dimensions and Depth of Flooding M. Tuscher & T. Hanák https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/96/1/012036
199. Uncertainty quantification of flood damage estimation for urban drainage risk management M. Morita & Y. Tung https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.297
200. A new approach for urban flood risk assessment using coupled SWMM–HEC-RAS-2D model K. Khatooni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123849
201. Estimation of the local financial costs of flood damage with different methodologies in Unye (Ordu), Turkey N. Beden & A. Ulke Keskin https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04802-w
202. Sustainability-Based Flood Hazard Mapping of the Swannanoa River Watershed E. Ahmadisharaf et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101735
203. Assessing coastal flood risk in a changing climate for the City of Vancouver T. Lyle & T. Mills https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2015.1126695
204. Flood Damage Assessment: A Review of Microscale Methodologies for Residential Buildings O. Aribisala et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113817
205. An integrated reconstruction framework of flash flood to unravel impacts, controlling factors and disaster amplification J. Ding & X. Wang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106270
206. Structural Resilience of Pole-Mounted Substations Subjected to Flooding: Generalized Framework and a Malaysian Case Study W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1143
207. A Review of Flood Loss Models as Basis for Harmonization and Benchmarking T. Gerl et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159791
208. Mesh type tradeoffs in 2D hydrodynamic modeling of flooding with a Godunov-based flow solver B. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.02.013
209. Going beyond the flood insurance rate map: insights from flood hazard map co-production A. Luke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1097-2018
210. Categorizing and Harmonizing Natural, Technological, and Socio-Economic Perils Following the Catastrophe Modeling Paradigm A. Mignan https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912780
211. A River Flood and Earthquake Risk Assessment of Railway Assets along the Belt and Road Q. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00358-2
212. Temporal development of flood risk considering settlement dynamics and local flood protection measures on catchment scale: an Austrian case study S. Achleitner et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2016.1167061
213. Catastrophe risk models as quantitative tools for climate change loss and damage: A demonstration for flood in Malawi, Vietnam, and the Philippines E. Galloway et al. https://doi.org/10.63024/0y4e-cdqp
214. Evaluating the cascading impacts of sea level rise and coastal flooding on emergency response spatial accessibility in Lower Manhattan, New York City J. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.067
215. Investigating Uncertainty in Developing Regional Building Inventories for Flood Damage Prediction J. Gutenson et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000240
216. Impact of the Rainfall Duration and Temporal Rainfall Distribution Defined Using the Huff Curves on the Hydraulic Flood Modelling Results N. Bezak et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8020069
217. A proposed methodology for deriving tsunami fragility functions for buildings using optimum intensity measures J. Macabuag et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2485-8
218. Hydrological and Hydraulic Modeling Applied to Flash Flood Events in a Small Urban Stream L. Bruno et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9120223
219. Development and assessment of uni- and multivariable flood loss models for Emilia-Romagna (Italy) F. Carisi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2057-2018
220. Probabilistic mapping and sensitivity assessment of dam-break flood hazard C. Rizzo et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2023.2174026
221. A practical framework for ensuring resilient housing infrastructure in flood-prone areas M. Sen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105297
222. Building treatments for urban flood inundation models and implications for predictive skill and modeling efficiency J. Schubert & B. Sanders https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.012
223. Is anthropogenic land subsidence a possible driver of riverine flood-hazard dynamics? A case study in Ravenna, Italy F. Carisi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1390315
224. Large Scale Flood Hazard Analysis by Including Defence Failures on the Dutch River System A. Curran et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081732
225. Characterization of vulnerability of road networks to fluvial flooding using SIS network diffusion model B. Abdulla et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-020-00004-z
226. Potential Dam Breach Analysis and Flood Wave Risk Assessment Using HEC-RAS and Remote Sensing Data: A Multicriteria Approach E. Psomiadis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030364
227. An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Tree-Based Models for Multi-Variate Flood Damage Assessment in Australia R. Hasanzadeh Nafari et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8070282
228. Coastal inundation and damage exposure estimation: a case study for Jakarta P. Ward et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9599-1
229. Development of an empirical flood fragility curve for levee failure and its application in probabilistic flood risk assessment: A case study of Citeureup Village, Indonesia M. Farid et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105793
230. Establishment of flood damage function model for rural roads: A case study in the Teesta River basin, Bangladesh S. Haque et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100269
231. Flood Risk Assessment, Future Trend Modeling, and Risk Communication: A Review of Ongoing Research A. Salman & Y. Li https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000294
232. Review Article: Economic evaluation of flood damage to agriculture – review and analysis of existing methods P. Brémond et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2493-2013
233. Sedimentology of granite boulder conglomerates and associated clastics in the onshore section of the late Mesozoic Pletmos Basin (Western Cape, South Africa) E. Bordy & T. America https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.03.013
234. Flood Inundation Prediction P. Bates https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-030121-113138
235. Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach B. Jongman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3733-2012
236. Rising tides: adaptation policy alternatives for coastal residential buildings in Australia C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1020500