22 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A new approach to geographic partitioning of probabilistic seismic hazard using seismic source distance with earthquake extreme and perceptibility statistics: an application to the southern Balkan region T. Bayliss https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv519
2. Curie point depths of Bulgarian territory inferred from geomagnetic observations and its correlation with regional thermal structure and seismicity P. Trifonova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.03.014
3. Results of the magnetotelluric investigations at geophysical observatories in Bulgaria B. Srebrov et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy268
4. Seismic hazard for the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP). Part 1: probabilistic seismic hazard analysis along the pipeline D. Slejko et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01111-2
5. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Kahramanmaras Province, Turkey Y. Ince & T. Kurnaz https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3434-5
6. Seismic hazard across Bulgaria and neighbouring areas: extreme magnitude recurrence and strong ground shaking P. Burton & T. Bayliss https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0699-6
7. Statistical identification of seismicity phases A. Pievatolo & R. Rotondi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03773.x
8. Some Contributions of the Neo-Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment Approach to Earthquake Risk Assessment for the City of Sofia I. Paskaleva et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-010-0127-8
9. Overview of the available information concerning seismic hazard for the Kozloduy NPP site P. Groudev & P. Petrova https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.01.007
10. Integration of Geological, Geophysical and Seismological Data for Seismic Hazard Assessment Using Spatial Matching Index P. Trifonova et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2019.112013
11. Maximum macroseismic intensity map of Greece for the time period 1953–2011 C. Chalkias et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2013.824389
12. From National to Transnational Seismic Monitoring Products and Services in the Republic of Bulgaria, Republic of Moldova, Romania, and Ukraine A. Mărmureanu et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200393
13. An Updated Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for Romania and Comparison with the Approach and Outcomes of the SHARE Project F. Pavel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1223-6
14. Evaluation of seismic hazard with probabilistic approach for Antakya Province (Turkey) T. Kurnaz & Y. Ince https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-020-01438-5
15. Novel Approach to Earthquake Hazard Assessment Territory Republic of Moldova E. Isicico et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2025.142004
16. Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical buildings in Sofia: A multi-Methodological approach G. Pianese et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.111834
17. Deterministic approach to the seismic hazard of dam sites in Kızılırmak basin, Turkey E. Seyrek & H. Tosun https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9795-7
18. Potential Locations of Strong Earthquakes in Bulgaria and the Neighbouring Regions A. Gorshkov et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8103337
19. Earthquake scenarios and population exposure for the city of Plovdiv D. Solakov et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06087-7
20. Risk assessment of geological disaster in the region of Primorsko Municipality A. Frantzova https://doi.org/10.52321/GeolBalc.50.3.29
21. An updated, homogeneous, and declustered earthquake catalog for South Korea and neighboring regions S. Maiti & B. Kim https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4021-2025
22. Potential suitability for urban planning and industry development using natural hazard maps and geological–geomorphological parameters G. Bathrellos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1263-x