Articles | Volume 25, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4115-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4115-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Capture of near-critical debris flows by flexible barriers: an experimental investigation
Miao Huo
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Sichuan Agricultural University, College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, 625014 Ya’an, China
Stéphane Lambert
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, 38000 Grenoble, France
Firmin Fontaine
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, 38000 Grenoble, France
Guillaume Piton
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, 38000 Grenoble, France
Related authors
No articles found.
Suzanne Lapillonne, Georgios Fourtakas, Vincent Richefeu, Guillaume Piton, and Guillaume Chambon
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 7059–7075, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7059-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7059-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Debris flows are fast-flowing events that are saturated with granular material. They naturally occur in steep creeks and are a threat to local communities. Scientists have turned to numerical models to better understand how they behave. We investigate the accuracy of a numerical model that relies on modelling the debris flow as a mixture of a granular phase and a fluid phase. We focus on a demonstration of the capacity of the model to reliably represent the behaviour of the flow at different scales.
Sebastien Klotz, Caroline Le Bouteiller, Nicolle Mathys, Firmin Fontaine, Xavier Ravanat, Jean-Emmanuel Olivier, Frédéric Liébault, Hugo Jantzi, Patrick Coulmeau, Didier Richard, Jean-Pierre Cambon, and Maurice Meunier
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4371–4388, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4371-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4371-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Mountain badlands are places of intense erosion. They deliver large amounts of sediment to river systems, with consequences for hydropower sustainability, habitat quality and biodiversity, and flood hazard and river management. Draix-Bleone Observatory was created in 1983 to understand and quantify sediment delivery from such badland areas. Our paper describes how water and sediment fluxes have been monitored for almost 40 years in the small mountain catchments of this observatory.
Marie Dumont, Simon Gascoin, Marion Réveillet, Didier Voisin, François Tuzet, Laurent Arnaud, Mylène Bonnefoy, Montse Bacardit Peñarroya, Carlo Carmagnola, Alexandre Deguine, Aurélie Diacre, Lukas Dürr, Olivier Evrard, Firmin Fontaine, Amaury Frankl, Mathieu Fructus, Laure Gandois, Isabelle Gouttevin, Abdelfateh Gherab, Pascal Hagenmuller, Sophia Hansson, Hervé Herbin, Béatrice Josse, Bruno Jourdain, Irene Lefevre, Gaël Le Roux, Quentin Libois, Lucie Liger, Samuel Morin, Denis Petitprez, Alvaro Robledano, Martin Schneebeli, Pascal Salze, Delphine Six, Emmanuel Thibert, Jürg Trachsel, Matthieu Vernay, Léo Viallon-Galinier, and Céline Voiron
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3075–3094, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3075-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3075-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Saharan dust outbreaks have profound effects on ecosystems, climate, health, and the cryosphere, but the spatial deposition pattern of Saharan dust is poorly known. Following the extreme dust deposition event of February 2021 across Europe, a citizen science campaign was launched to sample dust on snow over the Pyrenees and the European Alps. This campaign triggered wide interest and over 100 samples. The samples revealed the high variability of the dust properties within a single event.
Maxime Morel, Guillaume Piton, Damien Kuss, Guillaume Evin, and Caroline Le Bouteiller
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1769–1787, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1769-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1769-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In mountain catchments, damage during floods is generally primarily driven by the supply of a massive amount of sediment. Predicting how much sediment can be delivered by frequent and infrequent events is thus important in hazard studies. This paper uses data gathered during the maintenance operation of about 100 debris retention basins to build simple equations aiming at predicting sediment supply from simple parameters describing the upstream catchment.
Suzanne Lapillonne, Firmin Fontaine, Frédéric Liebault, Vincent Richefeu, and Guillaume Piton
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1241–1256, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1241-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1241-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Debris flows are fast flows most often found in torrential watersheds. They are composed of two phases: a liquid phase which can be mud-like and a granular phase, including large boulders, transported along with the flow. Due to their destructive nature, accessing features of the flow, such as velocity and flow height, is difficult. We present a protocol to analyse debris flow data and results of the Réal torrent in France. These results will help experts in designing models.
Guillaume Piton, Toshiyuki Horiguchi, Lise Marchal, and Stéphane Lambert
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3293–3314, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3293-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3293-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Open check dams are flood protection structures trapping sediment and large wood. Large wood obstructs openings of dams, thus increasing flow levels. If flow levels become higher than the dam crest, the trapped large wood may overtop the structure and be suddenly released downstream, which may also eventually obstruct downstream bridges. This paper is based on experiments on small-scale models. It shows how to compute the increase in flow level and conditions leading to sudden overtopping.
Cited articles
Albaba, A., Lambert, S., Kneib, F., Chareyre, B., and Nicot, F.: DEM Modeling of a Flexible Barrier Impacted by a Dry Granular Flow, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 50, 2029–3048, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1286-z, 2017. a, b
Albaba, A., Lambert, S., and Faug, T.: Dry granular avalanche impact force on a rigid wall: Analytic shock solution versus discrete element simulations, Physical Review E, 97, 052903, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.052903, 2018. a, b
Albaba, A., Schwarz, M., Wendeler, C., Loup, B., and Dorren, L.: Numerical modeling using an elastoplastic-adhesive discrete element code for simulating hillslope debris flows and calibration against field experiments , Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2339–2358, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2339-2019, 2019. a
Armanini, A.: Discussion, Journal of Hydraul Research, 47, 381–383, https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2009.9522009, 2009. a
Armanini, A. and Scotton, P.: On the impact of a debris flow on structures, Proceedings of XXV Congress of International Association for Hydraulic Research, Tokyo, Japan, 30 August–3 September 1993, 203–210, 1993. a
Ashwood, W. and Hungr, O.: Estimating total resisting force in flexible barrier impacted by a granular avalanche using physical and numerical modeling, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 53, 1700–1717, https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0481, 2016. a, b, c, d
Berger, S., Hofmann, R., and Preh, A.: Impacts on Embankments, Rigid and Flexible Barriers Against Rockslides: Model Experiments vs. DEM Simulations, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03721-5, 2024. a, b
Bertrand, D., Trad, A., Limam, A., and Silvani, C.: Full-scale dynamic analysis of an innovative rockfall fence under impact using the discrete element method: From the local scale to the structure scale, Ock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 45, 885–900, 2012. a
Brighenti, R., Segalini, A., and Ferrero, A. M.: Debris flow hazard mitigation: A simplified analytical model for the design of flexible barriers, Computers and Geotechnics, 54, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.05.010, 2013. a, b, c, d
Bugnion, L., McArdell, B. W., Bartelt, P., and Wendeler, C.: Measurements of hillslope debris flow impact pressure on obstacles, Landslides, 9, 179–187, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0294-4, 2012. a
Canelli, L., Ferrero, A. M., Migliazza, M., and Segalini, A.: Debris flow risk mitigation by the means of rigid and flexible barriers – experimental tests and impact analysis, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 1693–1699, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1693-2012, 2012. a
Chehade, R., Chevalier, B., Dedecker, F., Breul, P., and Thouret, J.-C.: Discrete modelling of debris flows for evaluating impacts on structures, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 80, 6629–6645, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02278-3, 2021. a
Choi, C. E., Ng, C. W. W., and Liu, H.: Flume Modeling of Debris Flows, in: Advances in Debris-flow Science and Practice, edited by: Jakob, M., McDougall, S., and Santi, P., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 93–125, ISBN 978-3-031-48690-6 978-3-031-48691-3, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48691-3_4, 2024. a
Costa, J. E.: Physical Geomorphology of Debris Flows, in: Developments and Applications of Geomorphology, edited by: Costa, J. E. and Fleisher, P. J., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 268–317, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69759-3_9, 1984. a
Faug, T.: Depth-averaged analytic solutions for free-surface granular flows impacting rigid walls down inclines, Physical Review E, 92, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.062310, 2015. a
Faug, T.: Impact force of granular flows on walls normal to the bottom: slow versus fast impact dynamics, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 58, 114–124, https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0399, 2021. a, b, c, d
Ferrero, A., Segalini, A., and Umili, G.: Experimental tests for the application of an analytical model for flexible debris flow barrier design, Engineering Geology, 185, 33–42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.12.002, 2015. a
Fink, J. H., Malin, M. C., D'Alli, R. E., and Greeley, R.: Rheological properties of mudflows associated with the spring 1980 eruptions of Mount St. Helens Volcano, Washington, Geophysical Research Letters, 8, 43–46, https://doi.org/10.1029/GL008i001p00043, 1981. a
Guo, X., Li, Y., Cui, P., Yan, H., and Zhuang, J.: Intermittent viscous debris flow formation in Jiangjia Gully from the perspectives of hydrological processes and material supply, Journal of Hydrology, 589, 125184, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125184, 2020. a
Guo, X., Hürlimann, M., Cui, P., Chen, X., and Li, Y.: Monitoring cases of rainfall-induced debris flows in China, Landslides, 21, 2447–2466, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02316-7, 2024. a, b
Hu, K., Tian, M., and Li, Y.: Influence of Flow Width on Mean Velocity of Debris Flows in Wide Open Channel, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139, 65–69, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000648, 2013. a
Huang, Y. and Zhang, B.: Challenges and perspectives in designing engineering structures against debris-flow disaster, European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 26, 4476–4497, https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2020.1854126, 2022. a
Hungr, O., Morgan, G., and Kellerhals, R.: Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazards for design of remedial measures, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 21, https://doi.org/10.1139/t84-073, 1984. a
Huo, M., Zhou, J.-W., Zhao, J., Zhou, H.-W., Li, J., and Liu, X.: The normal impact stiffness of a debris-flow flexible barrier, Scientific Reports, 13, 3969, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30664-2, 2023. a
Huo, M., Lambert, S., Piton, G.: Videos of small-scale experiments of debris flow hitting a flexible barrier, Recherche DataGouv, V1, https://doi.org/10.57745/Y3PEBD, 2025. a
Hübl, J., Suda, J., Proske, D. Kaitna, R., and Scheidl, C.: Debris flow impact estimation, in: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Water Management and Hydraulic Engineering, Ohrid/Macedonia, 1–5 September 2009, 137–148, 2009. a
Hürlimann, M., Coviello, V., Bel, C., Guo, X., Berti, M., Graf, C., Hübl, J., Miyata, S., Smith, J. B., and Yin, H.-Y.: Debris-flow monitoring and warning: Review and examples, Earth-Science Reviews, 199, 102–981, 2019. a
Jacquemart, M., Meier, L., Graf, C., and Morsdorf, F.: 3D dynamics of debris flows quantified at sub-second intervals from laser profiles, Natural Hazards, 89, 785–800, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2993-1, 2017. a
Kim, B.-J., Choi, C., and Yune, C.-Y.: Multi-scale flume investigation of the influence of cylindrical baffles on the mobility of landslide debris, Engineering Geology, 314, 107012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107012, 2023. a, b, c
Kong, Y., Li, X., and Zhao, J.: Quantifying the transition of impact mechanisms of geophysical flows against flexible barrier, Engineering Geology, 289, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106188, 2021. a, b
Kong, Y., Guan, M., Li, X., Zhao, J., and Yan, H.: Bi-linear laws govern the impacts of debris flows, debris avalanches, and rock avalanches on flexible barrier, Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 127, e2022JF006870, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JF006870, 2022. a, b, c
Kwan, J.: Supplementary Technical Guidance on Design of Rigid Debris-resisting Barriers – GEO Report 270, Tech. rep., Geotechnical Engineering Office, Hong Kong, https://www.cedd.gov.hk/filemanager/eng/content_486/er270links (last access: 18 October 2025), 88 pp., 2012. a
Kwan, J. S. H., Lam, C., and Choi, C. E.: Advances in Design of Barriers for Debris Flow Impact, in: Advances in Debris-flow Science and Practice, edited by: Jakob, M., McDougall, S., and Santi, P., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 539–563, ISBN 978-3-031-48690-6 978-3-031-48691-3, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48691-3_16, 2024. a
Laigle, D. and Labbé, M.: SPH-Based Numerical Study of the Impact of Mudflows on Obstacles, International Journal of Erosion Control Engineering, 10, 56–66, https://doi.org/10.13101/ijece.10.56, 2017. a, b
Lam, H., Sze, E., Wong, E., Poudyal, S., Ng, C., Chan, S., and Choi, C.: Study of dynamic debris impact load on flexible debris-resisting barriers and the dynamic pressure coefficient, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 59, 2102–2118, https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2021-0325, 2022. a
Lambert, S., Fontaine, F., and Piton, G.: Flexible barrier and flow-driven woody debris: an experimental investigation of their interaction, European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 28, 1614–1636, https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2023.2268706, 2024. a, b, c
Lapillonne, S., Fontaine, F., Liebault, F., Richefeu, V., and Piton, G.: Debris-flow surges of a very active alpine torrent: a field database, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1241–1256, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1241-2023, 2023. a, b, c
Li, X., Zhao, J., and Kwan, J. S. H.: Assessing debris flow impact on flexible ring net barrier: A coupled CFD-DEM study, Computers and Geotechnics, 128, 1643–1670, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103850, 2020. a
McArdell, B. W., Hirschberg, J., Graf, C., Boss, S., and Badoux, A: Illgraben debris-flow characteristics 2019–2022, EnviDat, https://doi.org/10.16904/envidat.378, 2023. a, b
Nagl, G., Hübl, J., and Kaitna, R.: Stress anisotropy in natural debris flows during impacting a monitoring structure, Landslides, 19, 211–220, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01779-2, 2022. a
Nagl, G., Hübl, J., and Scheidl, C.: Real-scale measurements of debris-flow run-ups, Landslides, 21, 963–973, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02204-6, 2024. a, b, c
Ng, C., Choi, C., Kwan, J., Shiu, H., Ho, K., and Koo, R.: Flume Modelling of Debris Flow Resisting Baffles, in: One-Day Seminar on Natural Terrain Hazard Mitigation Measures, The Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists, 16–21, ISSN 9789889783617, 2012. a
Ng, C., Choi, C. E., and Goodwin, G. R.: Froude characterization for unsteady single-surge dry granular flows: impact pressure and runup height, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 56, 1968–1978, https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0529, 2019. a, b
Ng, C. W. W., Song, D., Choi, C. E., Koo, R. C. H., and Kwan, J. S. H.: A novel flexible barrier for landslide impact in centrifuge, Géotechnique Letters, 6, 221–225, https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.16.00048, 2016. a, b, c
Ng, C. W. W., Leonardi, A., Majeed, U., Pirulli, M., and Choi, C. E.: A Physical and Numerical Investigation of Flow–Barrier Interaction for the Design of a Multiple-Barrier System, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 149, 04022122, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002932, 2023. a
Ng, C. W. W., Majeed, U., and Choi, C. E.: Effects of solid fraction of saturated granular flows on overflow and landing mechanisms of rigid barriers, Géotechnique, 74, 27–41, https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.21.00170, 2024. a, b
Phillips, C. J. and Davies, T. R.: Determining rheological parameters of debris flow material, Geomorphology, 4, 101–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X(91)90022-3, 1991. a, b
Piton, G., Ceron Mayo, A. R., and Lambert, S.: Small Scale Modelling of Flexible Barriers. II: Interaction with Large Wood, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 149, https://doi.org/10.1061/JHEND8.HYENG-13071, 17 pp., 2023. a, b
Piton, G., D'Agostino, V., Horiguchi, T., Ikeda, A., and Hübl, J.: Functional Design of Mitigation Measures: From Design Event Definition to Targeted Process Modifications, in: Advances in Debris-Flow Science and Practice, edited by: Jakob, M., McDougall, S., and Santi, P. M., Springer International Publishing, 495–538, ISBN 978-3-031-48690-6, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48691-3_15, 2024. a
Poudyal, S., Choi, C., Song, D., Zhou, G., Yune, C., Cui, Y., Leonardi, A., Busslinger, M., Wendeler, C., Piton, G., and Moase, E.: Review of the mechanisms of debris-flow impact against barriers, in: International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, 1027–1033, https://doi.org/10.25676/11124/173112, 2019. a
Prakash, N., Santi, P., Strouth, A., Sepulveda, S. A., and Dowling, C.: Fatalities from Debris Flows: Worldwide Distribution and Trends, in: Advances in Debris-flow Science and Practice, edited by: Jakob, M., McDougall, S., and Santi, P., 75–91, Springer International Publishing, Cham, ISBN 978-3-031-48690-6 978-3-031-48691-3, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48691-3_3, 2024. a
Prochaska, A. B., Santi, P. M., Higgins, J. D., and Cannon, S. H.: A study of methods to estimate debris flow velocity, Landslides, 5, 431–444, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-008-0137-0, 2008. a
Sasiharan, N., Muhunthan, B., Badger, T., Shu, S., and Carradine, D.: Numerical analysis of the performance of wire mesh and cable net rockfall protection systems, Engineering Geology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.09.005, 2006. a
Scheidl, C., Chiari, M., Kaitna, R., Müllegger, M., Krawtschuk, A., Zimmermann, T., and Proske, D.: Analysing Debris-Flow Impact Models, Based on a Small Scale Modelling Approach, Surveys in Geophysics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-012-9199-6, 2013. a
Scheidl, C., Friedl, C., Reider, L., Wernhart, S., Fuchs, A.-L., Dankwerth, A. L., Nagl, G., Kaitna, R., and Proske, D.: Impact dynamics of granular debris flows based on a small-scale physical model, Acta Geotechnica, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-02116-8, 2023. a, b, c
Shen, W., Zhao, T., Zhao, J., Dai, F., and Zhou, G. G.: Quantifying the impact of dry debris flow against a rigid barrier by DEM analyses, Engineering Geology, 241, 86–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.05.011, 2018. a
Song, D.: Mechanisms of debris flow impact on rigid and flexible barriers, PhD thesis, HKUST, HKSAR, HongKong, PRC, https://doi.org/10.14711/thesis-b1781035, 2016. a
Song, D., Zhou, G. G., Chen, X. Q., Li, J., Wang, A., Peng, P., and Xue, K. X.: General equations for landslide-debris impact and their application to debris-flow flexible barrier, Engineering Geology, 288, 106154, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106154, 2021. a
Song, D., Chen, X., Sadeghi, H., Zhong, W., Hu, H., and Liu, W.: Impact behavior of dense debris flows regulated by pore-pressure feedback, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 128, e2023JF007074, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JF007074, 2023. a, b
Sun, H. and Law, R.: A preliminary study on impact of landslide debris on flexible barriers, Tech. Rep. 309, Geotechnical Engineering Office Civil Engineering and Development Department The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, https://g-city.sass.org.cn/_upload/article/files/95/40/e04f9c594a679dd4a87993817724/c4e5dbf3-c7fa-41f6-a6c1-0041ae370eab.pdf (last access: 16 October 2025), 2015. a, b
Tan, D. Y. and Yin, J. H., Feng, W. Q., Zhu, Z. H., and Qin, J. Q. aand Chen, W. B.: New simple method for calculating impact force on flexible barrier considering partial muddy debris flow passing through, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002133, 2019. a, b, c
Tiberghien, D., Laigle, D., Naaim, M., Thibert, E., and Ousset, F.: Experimental investigations of interaction between mudflow and an obstacle, in: Debris-flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction and assessment, Millpress, Rotterdam, 281-292, ISBN 978-90-77017-78-4, 2007. a
Vagnon, F.: Design of active debris flow mitigation measures: a comprehensive analysis of existing impact models, Landslides, 17, 313–333, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01278-5, 2020. a
Vagnon, F. and Segalini, A.: Debris flow impact estimation on a rigid barrier, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1691–1697, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1691-2016, 2016. a, b
Watanabe, M. and Ikeya, H.: Investigation and analysis of volcanic mud flows on Mt Sakurajima, Japan, in: Erosion and Sediment Transport Measurement (Proceedings of the Florence Symposium), Firenze (IT), 133, 245–256, https://iahs.info/uploads/dms/iahs_133_0245.pdf (last access: 18 October 2025), 1981. a
Wendeler, C. and Volkwein, A.: Laboratory tests for the optimization of mesh size for flexible debris-flow barriers, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2597–2604, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2597-2015, 2015. a
Wendeler, C. S. I.: Murgangrückhalt in Wildbächen: Grundlagen zu Planung und Berechnung von flexiblen Barrieren, PhD thesis, ETH Zurich, https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-A-005699588, 2008. a, b
Xiao, S., Xu, X., Wang, H., Li, D., Wei, Z., and Zhang, T.: Effects of flow regimes on the interaction between granular flow and flexible barrier, PLoS ONE, 18, e0285559, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285559, 2023. a
Yune, C.-Y., Chae, Y.-K., Paik, J., Kim, G., Lee, S.-W., and Seo, H.-S.: Debris flow in metropolitan area–2011 Seoul debris flow, Journal of Mountain Science, 10, 199–206, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2518-7, 2013. a
Yune, C.-Y., Kim, B.-J., Jun, K.-J., Park, S.-D., Lee, S.-W., Kim, G.-H., Lee, C.-W., and Paik, J.-C.: Real-scale experiment of debris flow in a natural gulley: key findings and lessons learned, Landslides, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02134-3, 2023. a
Short summary
The presented study mainly describes the loading on a flexible barrier at rest in order that the static component of the force exerted by the dead zone received limited attention up to now. Four interaction modes are identified from a gentle flow stopping to high granular jump and/or overtopping. Interestingly, overflow resulted in a significant increase in the residual load and were almost twice that observed in the absence of overflow.
The presented study mainly describes the loading on a flexible barrier at rest in order that the...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint