Articles | Volume 25, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2751-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2751-2025
Research article
 | 
18 Aug 2025
Research article |  | 18 Aug 2025

What can we learn about multi-hazard impacts from global disaster records?

Wiebke S. Jäger, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Timothy Tiggeloven, and Philip J. Ward

Viewed

Total article views: 4,787 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,592 986 209 4,787 151 167
  • HTML: 3,592
  • PDF: 986
  • XML: 209
  • Total: 4,787
  • BibTeX: 151
  • EndNote: 167
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jul 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jul 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,787 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,627 with geography defined and 160 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 16 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Multiple hazards, occurring simultaneously or consecutively, can have more extreme impacts than single hazards. We examined the disaster records in the global emergency events database EM-DAT to better understand this phenomenon. We developed a method to identify such multi-hazards and analysed their reported impacts using statistics. Multi-hazards have accounted for a disproportionate number of the impacts, but there appear to be different archetypal patterns in which the impacts compound.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint