Articles | Volume 22, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-481-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-481-2022
Research article
 | 
16 Feb 2022
Research article |  | 16 Feb 2022

Automated determination of landslide locations after large trigger events: advantages and disadvantages compared to manual mapping

David G. Milledge, Dino G. Bellugi, Jack Watt, and Alexander L. Densmore

Viewed

Total article views: 3,290 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,079 1,137 74 3,290 252 51 58
  • HTML: 2,079
  • PDF: 1,137
  • XML: 74
  • Total: 3,290
  • Supplement: 252
  • BibTeX: 51
  • EndNote: 58
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Jul 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Jul 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,290 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,078 with geography defined and 212 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Earthquakes can trigger thousands of landslides, causing severe and widespread damage. Efforts to understand what controls these landslides rely heavily on costly and time-consuming manual mapping from satellite imagery. We developed a new method that automatically detects landslides triggered by earthquakes using thousands of free satellite images. We found that in the majority of cases, it was as skilful at identifying the locations of landslides as the manual maps that we tested it against.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint