Articles | Volume 22, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1627-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1627-2022
Research article
 | 
17 May 2022
Research article |  | 17 May 2022

Variable hydrograph inputs for a numerical debris-flow runout model

Andrew Mitchell, Sophia Zubrycky, Scott McDougall, Jordan Aaron, Mylène Jacquemart, Johannes Hübl, Roland Kaitna, and Christoph Graf

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on nhess-2021-352', Martin Mergili, 25 Jan 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Andrew Mitchell, 17 Mar 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on nhess-2021-352', Velio Coviello, 12 Feb 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Andrew Mitchell, 17 Mar 2022
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Andrew Mitchell, 17 Mar 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (21 Mar 2022) by Daniele Giordan
AR by Andrew Mitchell on behalf of the Authors (21 Mar 2022)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (31 Mar 2022) by Daniele Giordan
AR by Andrew Mitchell on behalf of the Authors (07 Apr 2022)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Debris flows are complex, surging movements of sediment and water. Discharge observations from well-studied debris-flow channels were used as inputs for a numerical modelling study of the downstream effects of chaotic inflows. The results show that downstream impacts are sensitive to inflow conditions. Inflow conditions for predictive modelling are highly uncertain, and our method provides a means to estimate the potential variability in future events.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint