Articles | Volume 21, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1955-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1955-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Indirect flood impacts and cascade risk across interdependent linear infrastructures
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of
Florence, Florence, Italy
Maria Pregnolato
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Fabio Castelli
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of
Florence, Florence, Italy
Related authors
Sara Rrokaj, Chiara Arrighi, Marta Ballocci, Gabriele Bertoli, Francesca da Porto, Claudia De Lucia, Mario Di Bacco, Paola Di Fluri, Alessio Domeneghetti, Marco Donà, Alice Gallazzi, Andrea Gennaro, Gianluca Lelli, Sara Mozzon, Natasha Petruccelli, Elisa Saler, Anna Rita Scorzini, Simone Sterlacchini, Gaia Treglia, Debora Voltolina, Marco Zazzeri, and Daniela Molinari
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-358, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-358, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Flood damage data are key to understanding territorial risks and supporting the design of mitigation measures. However, such data are scarce, and the available ones often lack a high level of detail. We conducted a field survey of residential, commercial, and industrial buildings affected by the record-breaking flood event that hit Italy’s Marche region in 2022. The resulting datasets cover 256 assets and include detailed information on damage, building features, and mitigation measures.
Gabriele Bertoli, Chiara Arrighi, and Enrica Caporali
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 565–580, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-565-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-565-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Environmental assets are crucial to sustaining and fulfilling life on Earth via ecosystem services (ESs). Studying their flood risk is thus seminal, in addition to being required by several norms. However, this field is not yet adequately developed. We studied the exposure component of flood risk and developed an evaluating methodology based on the ESs provided by environmental assets to discern assets and areas that are more important than others with metrics suitable to large-scale studies.
Claudia De Lucia, Michele Amaddii, and Chiara Arrighi
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4317–4339, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4317-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4317-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This work describes the flood damage to cultural heritage (CH) that occurred in September 2022 in central Italy. Datasets related to flood impacts on cultural heritage are rare, and this work aims at highlighting both tangible and intangible aspects and their correlation with physical characteristics of flood (i.e. water depth and flow velocity). The results show that current knowledge and datasets are inadequate for risk assessment of CH.
Chiara Arrighi and Alessio Domeneghetti
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 673–679, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-673-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-673-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this communication, we reflect on environmental flood impacts by analysing the reported environmental consequences of the 2023 Emilia-Romagna floods. The most frequently reported damage involves water resources and water-related ecosystems. Indirect effects in time and space, intrinsic recovery capacity, cascade impacts on socio-economic systems, and the lack of established monitoring activities appear to be the most challenging aspects for future research.
Daniela Molinari, Anna Rita Scorzini, Chiara Arrighi, Francesca Carisi, Fabio Castelli, Alessio Domeneghetti, Alice Gallazzi, Marta Galliani, Frédéric Grelot, Patric Kellermann, Heidi Kreibich, Guilherme S. Mohor, Markus Mosimann, Stephanie Natho, Claire Richert, Kai Schroeter, Annegret H. Thieken, Andreas Paul Zischg, and Francesco Ballio
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2997–3017, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2997-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2997-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Flood risk management requires a realistic estimation of flood losses. However, the capacity of available flood damage models to depict real damages is questionable. With a joint effort of eight research groups, the objective of this study was to compare the performances of nine models for the estimation of flood damage to buildings. The comparison provided more objective insights on the transferability of the models and on the reliability of their estimations.
Sara Rrokaj, Chiara Arrighi, Marta Ballocci, Gabriele Bertoli, Francesca da Porto, Claudia De Lucia, Mario Di Bacco, Paola Di Fluri, Alessio Domeneghetti, Marco Donà, Alice Gallazzi, Andrea Gennaro, Gianluca Lelli, Sara Mozzon, Natasha Petruccelli, Elisa Saler, Anna Rita Scorzini, Simone Sterlacchini, Gaia Treglia, Debora Voltolina, Marco Zazzeri, and Daniela Molinari
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-358, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-358, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Flood damage data are key to understanding territorial risks and supporting the design of mitigation measures. However, such data are scarce, and the available ones often lack a high level of detail. We conducted a field survey of residential, commercial, and industrial buildings affected by the record-breaking flood event that hit Italy’s Marche region in 2022. The resulting datasets cover 256 assets and include detailed information on damage, building features, and mitigation measures.
Gabriele Bertoli, Chiara Arrighi, and Enrica Caporali
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 565–580, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-565-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-565-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Environmental assets are crucial to sustaining and fulfilling life on Earth via ecosystem services (ESs). Studying their flood risk is thus seminal, in addition to being required by several norms. However, this field is not yet adequately developed. We studied the exposure component of flood risk and developed an evaluating methodology based on the ESs provided by environmental assets to discern assets and areas that are more important than others with metrics suitable to large-scale studies.
Claudia De Lucia, Michele Amaddii, and Chiara Arrighi
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4317–4339, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4317-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4317-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This work describes the flood damage to cultural heritage (CH) that occurred in September 2022 in central Italy. Datasets related to flood impacts on cultural heritage are rare, and this work aims at highlighting both tangible and intangible aspects and their correlation with physical characteristics of flood (i.e. water depth and flow velocity). The results show that current knowledge and datasets are inadequate for risk assessment of CH.
Chiara Arrighi and Alessio Domeneghetti
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 673–679, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-673-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-673-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this communication, we reflect on environmental flood impacts by analysing the reported environmental consequences of the 2023 Emilia-Romagna floods. The most frequently reported damage involves water resources and water-related ecosystems. Indirect effects in time and space, intrinsic recovery capacity, cascade impacts on socio-economic systems, and the lack of established monitoring activities appear to be the most challenging aspects for future research.
Maria Pregnolato, Andrew O. Winter, Dakota Mascarenas, Andrew D. Sen, Paul Bates, and Michael R. Motley
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1559–1576, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1559-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1559-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The interaction of flow, structure and network is complex, and yet to be fully understood. This study aims to establish rigorous practices of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for modelling hydrodynamic forces on inundated bridges, and understanding the consequences of such impacts on the surrounding network. The objectives of this study are to model hydrodynamic forces as the demand on the bridge structure, to advance a structural reliability and network-level analysis.
Francisco Peña, Fernando Nardi, Assefa Melesse, Jayantha Obeysekera, Fabio Castelli, René M. Price, Todd Crowl, and Noemi Gonzalez-Ramirez
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 775–793, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-775-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-775-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater-induced flooding, a rare phenomenon that is increasing in low-elevation coastal cities due to higher water tables, is often neglected in flood risk mapping due to its sporadic frequency and considerably lower severity with respect to other flood hazards. A loosely coupled flood model is used to simulate the interplay between surface and subsurface flooding mechanisms simultaneously. This work opens new horizons on the development of compound flood models from a holistic perspective.
Antonio Annis, Fernando Nardi, and Fabio Castelli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1019–1041, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1019-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1019-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we proposed a multi-source data assimilation framework for near-real-time flood mapping. We used a quasi-2D hydraulic model to update model states by injecting both stage gauge observations and satellite-derived flood extents. Results showed improvements in terms of water level prediction and reduction of flood extent uncertainty when assimilating both stage gauges and satellite images with respect to the disjoint assimilation of both observations.
Daniela Molinari, Anna Rita Scorzini, Chiara Arrighi, Francesca Carisi, Fabio Castelli, Alessio Domeneghetti, Alice Gallazzi, Marta Galliani, Frédéric Grelot, Patric Kellermann, Heidi Kreibich, Guilherme S. Mohor, Markus Mosimann, Stephanie Natho, Claire Richert, Kai Schroeter, Annegret H. Thieken, Andreas Paul Zischg, and Francesco Ballio
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2997–3017, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2997-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2997-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Flood risk management requires a realistic estimation of flood losses. However, the capacity of available flood damage models to depict real damages is questionable. With a joint effort of eight research groups, the objective of this study was to compare the performances of nine models for the estimation of flood damage to buildings. The comparison provided more objective insights on the transferability of the models and on the reliability of their estimations.
Cited articles
Achillopoulou, D. V., Mitoulis, S. A., Argyroudis, S. A., and Wang, Y.:
Monitoring of transport infrastructure exposed to multiple hazards: A roadmap for building resilience, Sci. Total Environ., 746, 141001, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141001, 2020.
Alexander, D.: A magnitude scale for cascading disasters, International J. Disast. Risk Reduct., 30, 180–185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.006, 2018.
Allen, J.: Using network segments in the visualization of urban isochrones,
Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisual., 53, 262–270, 2018.
Arosio, M., Martina, M. L. V., Creaco, E., and Figueiredo, R.: Indirect Impact Assessment of Pluvial Flooding in Urban Areas Using a Graph-Based Approach: The Mexico City Case Study, Water, 12, 1753, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061753, 2020.
Arrighi, C., Brugioni, M., Castelli, F., Franceschini, S., and Mazzanti, B.: Urban micro-scale flood risk estimation with parsimonious hydraulic modelling and census data, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1375–1391, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1375-2013, 2013.
Arrighi, C., Tarani, T., Vicario, E., and Castelli, F.: Flood impacts on a
water distribution network, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2109–2123, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-2109-2017, 2017.
Arrighi, C., Rossi, L., Trasforini, E., Rudari, R., Ferraris, L., Brugioni,
M., and Castelli, F.: Quantification of flood risk mitigation benefits: A building-scale damage assessment through the RASOR platform, J. Environ. Manage., 207, 92–104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.017, 2018.
Arrighi, C., Pregnolato, M., Dawson, R. J., and Castelli, F.: Preparedness
against mobility disruption by floods, Sci. Total Environ., 654, 1010–1022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.191, 2019.
Arrighi, C., Pregnolato, M., and Castelli, F.: Flood impact on critical linear infrastructures, in: Proceedings of FLOODrisk 2020 – 4th European
Conference on Flood Risk Management, Budapest, https://doi.org/10.3311/FLOODRisk2020.6.3, 2021.
Arrighi, C., Pregnolato, M. and Castelli, F.: Flood impact on critical linear
infrastructures, in: FLOODrisk 2020, 4th European Conference on Flood Risk
Management [online], https://doi.org/10.3311/FLOODRisk2020.6.3, 2021.
Autorità di Distretto Appennino Settentrionale: Piano di Gestione del
Rischio Alluvioni, available at:
http://www.appenninosettentrionale.it/itc/?page_id=410 (last access: 6 June 2020), 2016.
Balijepalli, C. and Oppong, O.: Measuring vulnerability of road network
considering the extent of serviceability of critical road links in urban areas, J. Trans. Geogr., 39, 145–155, 2014.
Bartram, J., Corrales, L., Davison, A., Deere, D., Drury, D., Gordon, B.,
Howard, G., Rinehold, A., and Stevens, M.: Water Safety Plan Manual: Step-by-step risk management for drinking water suppliers, World Health
Organization, Geneva, p. 108, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1970.tb00528.x, 2009.
Byers, E. A., Qadrdan, M., Leathard, A., Alderson, D., Hall, J. W., Amezaga, J. M., Tran, M., Kilsby, C. G., and Chaudry, M.: Cooling water for Great
Britain's future electricity supply, Proceedings ICE – Energy, 168, 188–204, 2015.
Casali, Y.: Topological Assessment of Changes in Road Network Systems in
Time, under Discrete Flooding Events, and under Classes of Unexpected
Disruptions, PhD Thesis, ETH Library, Zurich, https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000426547, 2020
Casali, Y. and Heinimann, H. R.: A topological characterization of flooding
impacts on the Zurich road network, PLoS One, 14, e0220338, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220338, 2019.
Cheung, P., Van Zyl, J., and Reis, L.: Extension of epanet for pressure driven demand modeling in water distribution system, Comput. Control Water
Ind., 1, 311–316, 2005.
De Bruijn, K. M., Maran, C., Zygnerski, M., Jurado, J., Burzel, A., Jeuken, C., and Obeysekera, J.: Flood resilience of critical infrastructures: approach and method applied to Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Water, 11, 517, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030517, 2019.
Dijkstra, E. W.: A note on two problems in connexion with graphs, Numer.
Math., 1, 269–271, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01386390, 1959.
Dong, S., Mostafizi, A., Wang, H., Gao, J., and Li, X.: Measuring the topological robustness of transportation networks to disaster-induced failures: A percolation approach, Physica A, 538, 122971, 2019.
Dueñas-Osorio, L., Craig, J. I., Goodno, B. J., and Bostrom, A.: Interdependent response of networked systems, J. Infrastruct. Syst., 13, 185–194, 2007.
Ebacher, G., Besner, M.-C., and Prevost, M.: Negative Pressure Events in
Water Distribution Systems: Public Health Risk Assessment Based on Transient
Analysis Outputs (ASCE), ASCE, in: Water Distribution Systems Analysis 2010, ASCE Book Series, Reston, VA, 471–483, https://doi.org/10.1061/41203(425)45, 2010.
Ellison, D., Duranceau, P., Ancel, S., Deagle, G., and McCoy, R.: Investigation of pipe cleaning methods, in: vol. 1, AWWA Research Foundation and American Water Works Association, USA, available at:
http://wwwtest.waterrf.org/PostingReportLibrary/90938.pdf (last access: 4 May 2017), 2003.
El-Maissi, A. M., Argyroudis, S. A., and Nazri, F. M.: Seismic Vulnerability
Assessment Methodologies for Roadway Assets and Networks: A State-of-the-Art
Review, Sustainability, 13, 61, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010061, 2021.
Emanuelsson, M. A. E., McIntyre, N., Hunt, C. F., Mawle, R., Kitson, J., and
Voulvoulis, N.: Flood risk assessment for infrastructure networks, J. Flood
Risk Manage., 7, 31–41, 2014.
Evans, B., Chen, A. S., Djordjevic, S., Webber, J., Gonzalez-Gomez, A., and
Stevens, J.: Investigating the effects of pluvial flooding and climate change on traffic flows in Barcelona and Bristol, Sustainability, 12, 2330, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062330, 2020.
Falco, G. J.: City Resilience through Data Analytics: A Human-centric Approach, Proced. Eng., 118, 1008–1014, 2015.
Fekete, A.: Critical infrastructure and flood resilience: cascading effects
beyond water, Water, 6, e1370, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1370, 2019.
Ford, A., Barr, S., Dawson, R., and James, P.: Transport accessibility analysis using GIS: Assessing sustainable transport in London, ISPRS Int. J.
Geo-Inform., 4, 124–149, 2015.
Gardner G.: The City: A System of Systems, in: State of the World. State of
the World, Island Press, Washington, DC, https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-756-8_3, 2016.
Gil, J. and Steinbach, P.: From flood risk to indirect flood impact: evaluation of street network performance for effective management, response
and repair, WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ., 118, 335–344, https://doi.org/10.2495/FRIAR080321, 2008.
Green, D., Yu, D., Pattison, I., Wilby, R., Bosher, L., Patel, R., Thompson,
P., Trowell, K., Draycon, J., Halse, M., Yang, L., and Ryley, T.: City-scale
accessibility of emergency responders operating during flood events, Nat.
Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1-2017, 2017.
Grossi, P. and Kunreuther, H.: Catastrophe modeling: a new approach to managing risk, Springer, New York, 2005.
Hilly, G., Vojinovic, Z., Weesakul, S., Sanchez, A., Hoang, D. N., Djordjevic, S., Chen, A. S., and Evans, B.: Methodological Framework for
Analysing Cascading Effects from Flood Events: The Case of Sukhumvit Area,
Bangkok, Thailand, Water, 81, 1–26, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010081, 2018.
Holden, R., Val, D. V., Burkhard, R. and Nodwell, S.: A network flow model for interdependent infrastructures at the local scale, Saf. Sci., 53, 51–60,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.013, 2013.
Kellermann, P., Schönberger, C., and Thieken, A. H.: Large-scale application of the flood damage model RAilway Infrastructure Loss (RAIL), Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2357–2371, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2357-2016, 2016.
Kermanshah, A. and Derrible, S.: Robustness of road systems to extreme flooding: using elements of GIS, travel demand, and network science, Nat.
Hazards, 86, 151–164, 2017.
Koks, E. E., Rozenberg, J., Zorn, C., Tariverdi, M., Vousdoukas, M., Fraser,
S. A., Hall, J. W., and Hallegatte, S.: A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets, Nat. Commun., 10, 2677, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10442-3, 2019.
Kong, J. and Simonovic, S. P.: A model of interdependent infrastructure system resilience, Int. J. Safe. Secur. Eng., 8, 377–389, https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V8-N3-377-389, 2018.
Lhomme, S., Serre, D., Diab, Y., and Laganier, R.: Analyzing resilience of urban networks: a preliminary step towards more flood resilient cities, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 221–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013, 2013.
Li, J., Shi, C. L., Chen, C. K., and Dueñas-Osorio, L.: A cascading failure model based on AC optimal power flow: Case study, Physica A, 508, 313–323, 2018.
Lyu, H. M., Sun, W. J., Shen, S. L., and Arulrajah, A.: Flood risk assessment in metro systems of mega-cities using a GIS-based modeling approach, Sci. Total Environ., 626, 1012–1025, 2018.
McClymont, K., Morrison, D., Beevers, L., and Carmen, E.: Flood resilience: a
systematic review, J. Environ. Plan. Manage., 63, 1151–1176, https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1641474, 2020.
Network Rail: Technical overview: Payments relating to disruption, Network
Rail, UK, available at: https://www.shorturl.at/ (last access: 26 April 2021), 2013.
Pant, R., Thacker, S., Hall, J. W., Alderson, D., and Barr, S.: Critical
infrastructure impact assessment due to flood exposure, J. Flood Risk Manage., 11, 22–33, 2018.
Pescaroli, G.: Perception of cascading risk and interconnected failures in
emergency planning: implications for operational resilience and policy making, Int. J. Disast. Risk Reduct., 30, 269–280, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.019, 2018.
Petit, F., Verner, D., Brannegan, D., Buehring, W., Dickinson, D., Guziel,
K., Haffenden, R., Phillips, J., and Peerenboom, J.: of Critical Infrastructure Dependencies and Interdependencies, Argonne National
Laboratory, Global Security Sciences Division, ANL/GSS-15/4, Argonne, Illinois, USA, available at: https://publications.anl.gov/anlpubs/2015/06/111906.pdf (last access: 21 May 2020), 2015.
Pregnolato, M. and Dawson, D.: Adaptation investments for transport resilience: trends and recommendations, Int. J. Safe. Secur. Eng., 8, 515–527, https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V8-N4-515-527, 2018.
Pregnolato, M., Ford, A., Robson, C., Glenis, V., Barr, S., and Dawson, R. J.: Assessing urban strategies for reducing the impacts of extreme weather on
infrastructure networks, Roy. Soc. Open Sci., 3, 1–15, 2016.
Pregnolato, M., Ford, A., Glenis, V., Wilkinson, S., and Dawson, R. J.: Impact of Climate Change on Disruption to Urban Transport Networks from Pluvial Flooding, J. Infrastruct. Syst., 23, 1–13, 2017a.
Pregnolato, M., Ford, A., Wilkinson, S. M., and Dawson, R. J.: The impact of
flooding on road transport: a depth-disruption function, Transp. Res. D, 55,
67–81, 2017b.
Pregnolato, M., Winter, A. O., Mascarenas, D., Sen, A. D., Bates, P., and Motley, M. R.: Assessing flooding impact to riverine bridges: an integrated analysis, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-375, in review, 2020.
Ouyang, M.: Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical
infrastructure systems, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 121, 43–60, 2014.
Regione Toscana: Ufficio Statistica: Pendolarismo per motivi di lavoro o
studio in Toscana, available at: https://bit.ly/3eHEawp (last access: 23 March 2020), 2015.
Rinaldi, S. M., Peerenboom, J. P., and Kelly, T. K.: Identifying, understanding and analysing critical infrastructure interdependencies, IEEE Control Syst. Mag., 21, 11–25, 2001.
Serre, D. and Heinzlef, C.: Assessing and mapping urban resilience to floods
with respect to cascading effects through critical infrastructure networks,
Int. J. Disast. Risk Reduct., 30, 235–243, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.018, 2018.
Siew, C. and Tanyimboh, T. T.: Pressure-dependent EPANET extension, Water
Resour. Manage., 26, 1477–1498, 2012.
Singh, P., Sinha, V. S. P., Vijahni, A., and Pahuja, N.: Vulnerability assessment of urban road network from urban flood, Int. J. Disast. Risk Reduct., 28, 237–250, 2018.
Tarani, F., Arrighi, C., Carnevali, L., Castelli, F., and Vicario E.: Flood
resilience of a water distribution system, Resilience of Cyber-Physical
Systems, Spirnger, Cham, Switzerland, 177–194, 2019.
United Nations: Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030,
Geneva, 2015.
USACE: Expected annual flood damage computation, available at:
https://www.hec.usace.army.mil/publications/ComputerProgramDocumentation/CPD-30.pdf
(last access: 5 February 2021), 1989.
Vörös, T., Juhász, M., and Koppány, K.: The measurement of
indirect effects in project appraisal, Transport. Res. Proced., 13, 114–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.012, 2016.
Winter, M. G., hearer, B., Palmer, D., Peeling, D., Harmer, C., and Sharpe, J.: The Economic Impact of Landslides and Floods on the Road Network, Proced.
Eng., 143, 1425–1434, 2016.
Zio, E.: Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical
infrastructures, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 152, 137–150, 2016.
Short summary
Floods may affect critical infrastructure which provides essential services to people. We analyse the impact of floods on road networks and water supply systems, and we investigate how cascade effects propagate if interdependencies among networks are not considered. The analysis shows that if preparedness plans include information on accessibility to key sections of water supply plants, less people suffer from water shortage in case of flood. The method is tested in the city of Florence (Italy).
Floods may affect critical infrastructure which provides essential services to people. We...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint