Articles | Volume 20, issue 1
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 197–220, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-197-2020
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 197–220, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-197-2020

Research article 17 Jan 2020

Research article | 17 Jan 2020

Sandbag replacement systems – a nonsensical and costly alternative to sandbagging?

Lena Lankenau et al.

Download

 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Download
Short summary
Sandbag and sandbag replacement systems (SBRSs) for flood defence are compared in terms of functionality (practical tests), costs, time, helpers and logistics (fictitious realistic scenarios). SBRSs are comparable in their functionality to sandbagging. All of the SBRSs considered show time-saving and logistical advantages. Under the assumed conditions, the higher investment costs of the SBRSs are offset with one subsequent reuse of the system owing to lower costs for helpers and logistics.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint