Dear Dr. Strauch,

Thank you for your clear and thoughtful reply to the reviewer’s comments. Given the manuscript, the reviewers comments and your reply on how to address the comments, I recommend to this publication is subject to minor comments. So please go ahead and incorporate the reviewer’s comments as indicated.
Looking forward to the adjusted manuscript.
Best regards,

Albert.

Dear Dr. Strauch,

Based on how you and the co-authors proposed to address the reviewers comments I recommended your manuscript previously for ‘publication with minor corrections’. This means according to the NHESS Copernicus journal guidelines that the revised manuscript was not sent out for a second round of reviews but instead is reviewed by the editor. I have read therefore your manuscript with great care, which was enjoyable, and have only very minor comments:
a) Page 11, line 15; be consistent in writing the word LiDAR (twice used in the sentence, one with more capitals than the other).
b) Page 11, line 22; Table 2 lists 4 not 6 different types of mass wasting. So mention something like ‘….. of which 4 are listed in table 2’.
c) Page 19, line 13 towards the end write ‘depart’ (so without ‘s’).

Very nice study, well done!,
Albert.