Articles | Volume 18, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2455-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2455-2018
Research article
 | 
14 Sep 2018
Research article |  | 14 Sep 2018

Effective surveyed area and its role in statistical landslide susceptibility assessments

Txomin Bornaetxea, Mauro Rossi, Ivan Marchesini, and Massimiliano Alvioli

Viewed

Total article views: 3,555 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,121 1,323 111 3,555 264 84 98
  • HTML: 2,121
  • PDF: 1,323
  • XML: 111
  • Total: 3,555
  • Supplement: 264
  • BibTeX: 84
  • EndNote: 98
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Apr 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Apr 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,555 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,275 with geography defined and 280 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 25 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
While producing a landslide susceptibility map using a fieldwork-based landslide inventory and a logistic regression model, two crucial questions came to our minds. (i) Shall we consider unsurveyed regions of the study area, for which landslide absence is typically assumed? (ii) Which reference mapping unit should be used in our model? So we compared four maps and found that rejecting unsurveyed regions together with slope units as reference mapping unit should be the best option.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint