Dear authors,
We have now received two reviews and two very detailed answers by the authors giving rise to possible critical enhancement of the quality of the manuscript. Indeed, the main criticisms pointed out by the two reviewers, and which I share also, are related to the absence of genericity of the approach and to a relatively limited scientific contribution to either advances in technologies or process understanding.
The answers provided by the authors, support the improvement of the manuscript and suggest publication subject to minor revision.
Ìndeed, to enhance the scope of the manuscript, I suggest the authors to add a real discussion section in which a "scientific-based cooking receipt" of what should be an ideal landslide inventory mapping supporting rapid disaster response (e.g. a mapping performed in a relative short period of time once relevant images are available) is presented and discussed. In other words, what would be an ideal generic workflow for rapid post disaster landslide mapping taking into account the extent of the affected areas, the images available (sensor, time), the number of landslides, the quality imposed to the mapping, and the possible integration of other information produced in the same time or by other techniques.
The authors should also more particularly discuss how their experience related to the Ghorka ETQ has contributed to increase the quality and procedures for post-disasyer rapid landslide mapping. References to standard procedures (for example used for EMS Copernicus, but other may also be cited) should be discussed.

Jean-Philippe Malet

Dear authors,

All issues addressed by the reviewers and editor have been addressed in the revised manuscript, which has increased, to my point, the scientific content of the work. The new section 4.6 is of interest for any scientists or managers interested in rapid landslide mapping.

The manuscript could be published subject to one technical correction.
Indeed, all the content is related to the use of optical imagery for rapid landslide mapping so this should be stressed in the title of the manuscript, and also in the title of some of the subsections.

Looking forward receiving the last version of the manuscript,
Jean-Philippe Malet