The role of minimum supply and social vulnerability  assessment for governing critical infrastructure  failure: current gaps and future agenda

Garschagen, Matthias; Sandholz, Simone

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1233-2018

Articles | Volume 18, issue 4

https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1233-2018

© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1233-2018

© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 18, issue 4

Research article

|

27 Apr 2018

Research article |

| 27 Apr 2018

The role of minimum supply and social vulnerability assessment for governing critical infrastructure failure: current gaps and future agenda

Matthias Garschagen and Simone Sandholz

Download

Final revised paper (published on 27 Apr 2018)
Preprint (discussion started on 23 Oct 2017)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Reviewer Comments', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Nov 2017
- AC2: 'reply to referee #1 comment', Simone Sandholz, 31 Jan 2018
RC2: 'Very well written paper on a relevant subject', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Dec 2017
- AC1: 'reply to referee #2 comment', Simone Sandholz, 29 Jan 2018

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (08 Feb 2018) by Sven Fuchs

AR by Simone Sandholz on behalf of the Authors (13 Mar 2018) Author's response

ED: Publish as is (14 Mar 2018) by Sven Fuchs

Post-review adjustments

AA: Author's adjustment | EA: Editor approval

AA by Simone Sandholz on behalf of the Authors (26 Apr 2018) Author's adjustment Manuscript

EA: Adjustments approved (26 Apr 2018) by Sven Fuchs

Short summary

Despite the increased attention given to critical infrastructure resilience in the context of natural hazards and disasters discussions on the role of social vulnerability assessments and minimum supply considerations for governing critical infrastructure failures remain scarce. Based on a structured literature review the paper responds to the identified gaps by developing a heuristic model on the linkages between the three topics and sketches out recommendations for a future research agenda.