Articles | Volume 18, issue 4
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1233–1246, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1233-2018
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1233–1246, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1233-2018
Research article
27 Apr 2018
Research article | 27 Apr 2018

The role of minimum supply and social vulnerability assessment for governing critical infrastructure failure: current gaps and future agenda

Matthias Garschagen and Simone Sandholz

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (08 Feb 2018) by Sven Fuchs
AR by Simone Sandholz on behalf of the Authors (13 Mar 2018)  Author's response
ED: Publish as is (14 Mar 2018) by Sven Fuchs

Post-review adjustments

AA: Author's adjustment | EA: Editor approval
AA by Simone Sandholz on behalf of the Authors (26 Apr 2018)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (26 Apr 2018) by Sven Fuchs
Short summary
Despite the increased attention given to critical infrastructure resilience in the context of natural hazards and disasters discussions on the role of social vulnerability assessments and minimum supply considerations for governing critical infrastructure failures remain scarce. Based on a structured literature review the paper responds to the identified gaps by developing a heuristic model on the linkages between the three topics and sketches out recommendations for a future research agenda.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint