Articles | Volume 18, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1233-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1233-2018
Research article
 | 
27 Apr 2018
Research article |  | 27 Apr 2018

The role of minimum supply and social vulnerability assessment for governing critical infrastructure failure: current gaps and future agenda

Matthias Garschagen and Simone Sandholz

Viewed

Total article views: 4,807 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,376 1,314 117 4,807 79 86
  • HTML: 3,376
  • PDF: 1,314
  • XML: 117
  • Total: 4,807
  • BibTeX: 79
  • EndNote: 86
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Oct 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Oct 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,807 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,457 with geography defined and 350 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 19 Nov 2024
Short summary
Despite the increased attention given to critical infrastructure resilience in the context of natural hazards and disasters discussions on the role of social vulnerability assessments and minimum supply considerations for governing critical infrastructure failures remain scarce. Based on a structured literature review the paper responds to the identified gaps by developing a heuristic model on the linkages between the three topics and sketches out recommendations for a future research agenda.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint