Articles | Volume 17, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1893-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1893-2017
Research article
 | 
13 Nov 2017
Research article |  | 13 Nov 2017

Economically optimal safety targets for interdependent flood defences in a graph-based approach with an efficient evaluation of expected annual damage estimates

Egidius Johanna Cassianus Dupuits, Ferdinand Lennaert Machiel Diermanse, and Matthijs Kok

Related authors

The dynamics of peak head responses at Dutch canal dikes and the impact of climate change
Bart Strijker and Matthijs Kok
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1495,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1495, 2024
Short summary
Using the classical model for structured expert judgment to estimate extremes: a case study of discharges in the Meuse River
Guus Rongen, Oswaldo Morales-Nápoles, and Matthijs Kok
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2831–2848, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2831-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2831-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multilevel multifidelity Monte Carlo methods for assessing uncertainty in coastal flooding
Mariana C. A. Clare, Tim W. B. Leijnse, Robert T. McCall, Ferdinand L. M. Diermanse, Colin J. Cotter, and Matthew D. Piggott
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2491–2515, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2491-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2491-2022, 2022
Short summary
Stochastic generation of spatially coherent river discharge peaks for continental event-based flood risk assessment
Dirk Diederen, Ye Liu, Ben Gouldby, Ferdinand Diermanse, and Sergiy Vorogushyn
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1041–1053, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1041-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1041-2019, 2019
Short summary
Re-evaluating safety risks of multifunctional dikes with a probabilistic risk framework
Richard Marijnissen, Matthijs Kok, Carolien Kroeze, and Jantsje van Loon-Steensma
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 737–756, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-737-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-737-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies, Socioeconomic and Management Aspects
Volcanic risk ranking and regional mapping of the Central Volcanic Zone of the Andes
María-Paz Reyes-Hardy, Luigia Sara Di Maio, Lucia Dominguez, Corine Frischknecht, Sébastien Biass, Leticia Freitas Guimarães, Amiel Nieto-Torres, Manuela Elissondo, Gabriela Pedreros, Rigoberto Aguilar, Álvaro Amigo, Sebastián García, Pablo Forte, and Costanza Bonadonna
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4267–4291, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4267-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4267-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development of a regionally consistent and fully probabilistic earthquake risk model for Central Asia
Mario A. Salgado-Gálvez, Mario Ordaz, Benjamín Huerta, Osvaldo Garay, Carlos Avelar, Ettore Fagà, Mohsen Kohrangi, Paola Ceresa, Georgios Triantafyllou, and Ulugbek T. Begaliev
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3851–3868, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3851-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3851-2024, 2024
Short summary
Critical infrastructure resilience: a guide for building indicator systems based on a multi-criteria framework with a focus on implementable actions
Zhuyu Yang, Bruno Barroca, Ahmed Mebarki, Katia Laffréchine, Hélène Dolidon, and Lionel Lilas
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3723–3753, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3723-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3723-2024, 2024
Short summary
Where to start with climate-smart forest management? Climatic risk for forest-based mitigation
Natalie Piazza, Luca Malanchini, Edoardo Nevola, and Giorgio Vacchiano
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3579–3595, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3579-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3579-2024, 2024
Short summary
Dynamic response of pile–slab retaining wall structure under rockfall impact
Peng Zou, Gang Luo, Yuzhang Bi, and Hanhua Xu
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3497–3517, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3497-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3497-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Brekelmans, R., Den Hertog, D., Roos, K., and Eijgenraam, C.: Safe Dike Heights at Minimal Costs: The Nonhomogeneous Case, Oper. Res., 60, 1342–1355, https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1110.1028, 2012.
Cormen, T. H.: Introduction to Algorithms, 3rd Edition:, MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2009.
Courage, W., Vrouwenvelder, T., van Mierlo, T., and Schweckendiek, T.: System behaviour in flood risk calculations, Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 7, 62–76, https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2013.790732, 2013.
de Bruijn, K. M., Diermanse, F. L. M., and Beckers, J. V. L.: An advanced method for flood risk analysis in river deltas, applied to societal flood fatality risk in the Netherlands, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2767–2781, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2767-2014, 2014.
Dijkstra, E. W.: A Note on Two Probles in Connexion with Graphs, Numer. Math., 1, 269–271, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01386390, 1959.
Download
Short summary
Flood defences, such as levees, emergency storage basins or storm surge barriers, can be designed as multiple lines of defence. If each line of defence has a number of possible levels, the total number of possible system configurations can be large. This paper presents an approach that is able to find an optimal configuration including future adaptations of such a flood defence system, based on an economic cost–benefit analysis.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint