Articles | Volume 16, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1911-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1911-2016
Research article
 | 
16 Aug 2016
Research article |  | 16 Aug 2016

Regional disaster impact analysis: comparing input–output and computable general equilibrium models

Elco E. Koks, Lorenzo Carrera, Olaf Jonkeren, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, Trond G. Husby, Mark Thissen, Gabriele Standardi, and Jaroslav Mysiak

Viewed

Total article views: 4,509 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,242 2,115 152 4,509 111 108
  • HTML: 2,242
  • PDF: 2,115
  • XML: 152
  • Total: 4,509
  • BibTeX: 111
  • EndNote: 108
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Nov 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Nov 2015)

Cited

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 22 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
In this study we analyze the economic consequences for two flood scenarios in the Po River basin in Italy, using three regional disaster impact models: two hybrid IO models and a regionally CGE model. Modelling results indicate that the difference in estimated total (national) economic losses and the regional distribution of those losses may vary by up to a factor of 7 between the three models, depending on the type of recovery path. Total economic impact is negative in all models though.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint