Articles | Volume 16, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1771-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1771-2016
Research article
 | 
03 Aug 2016
Research article |  | 03 Aug 2016

Vulnerability curves vs. vulnerability indicators: application of an indicator-based methodology for debris-flow hazards

Maria Papathoma-Köhle

Related authors

Brief Communication: California wildfires highlight institutional capacity as key to community resilience
Sven Fuchs, Konstantinos Karagiorgos, Margreth Keiler, Lars Nyberg, and Maria Papathoma-Köhle
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2509,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2509, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Risk evolution: how can changes in the built environment influence the potential loss of natural hazards?
B. Schwendtner, M. Papathoma-Köhle, and T. Glade
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2195–2207, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2195-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2195-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies, Socioeconomic and Management Aspects
Invited perspectives: Advancing knowledge co-creation in drought impact studies
Silvia De Angeli, Lorenzo Villani, Giulio Castelli, Maria Rusca, Giorgio Boni, Elena Bresci, and Luigi Piemontese
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2571–2589, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2571-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2571-2025, 2025
Short summary
How does perceived heat stress differ between urban forms and human vulnerability profiles? Case study Berlin
Nimra Iqbal, Marvin Ravan, Zina Mitraka, Joern Birkmann, Sue Grimmond, Denise Hertwig, Nektarios Chrysoulakis, Giorgos Somarakis, Angela Wendnagel-Beck, and Emmanouil Panagiotakis
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2481–2502, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2481-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2481-2025, 2025
Short summary
Modelling flood losses of micro-businesses in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Anna Buch, Dominik Paprotny, Kasra Rafiezadeh Shahi, Heidi Kreibich, and Nivedita Sairam
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2437–2453, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2437-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2437-2025, 2025
Short summary
Tracing online flood conversations across borders: a watershed-level analysis of geo-social media topics during the 2021 European flood
Sébastien Dujardin, Dorian Arifi, Sebastian Schmidt, Catherine Linard, and Bernd Resch
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2351–2369, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2351-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2351-2025, 2025
Short summary
An evaluation of the alignment of drought policy and planning guidelines with the contemporary disaster risk reduction agenda
Ilyas Masih
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2155–2178, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2155-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2155-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Adger, N. W., Brooks, N., Bentham, G., Agnew, M., and Eriksen, S.: New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity, Tyndall Centre for Climatic Research, Tyndall, 2004.
Balica, S. F., Douben, N., and Wright, N. G.: Flood vulnerability indices at varying spatial scales, Water Sci. Technol., 60.10, 2571–2580, 2009.
Barnett, J., Lambert, S., and Fry, I.: The Hazards of Indicators: Insights from the Environmental Vulnerability Index, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 98, 102–119, 2008.
Barroca, B., Bernardara, P., Mouchel, J. M., and Hubert, G.: Indicators for identification of urban flooding vulnerability, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 553–561, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-6-553-2006, 2006.
Birkmann, J.: Indicators and criteria for measuring vulnerability: Theoretical bases and requirements, in: Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies, edited by: Birkmann, J., UNU Press, Tokyo, 2006.
Short summary
Two established methods for assessing the physical vulnerability of buildings to natural hazards (vulnerability indicators and vulnerability curves) are compared after beind applied at the same case study. The case study area is located in South Tyrol (Italy) and it is subject to debris flow hazard. The results indicate that both methods have advantages and disadvantages and should be used in combination rather than in isolation by practitioners.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint