24 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Inclusivity through co-creation: Insights for practitioners to engage vulnerable populations in risk communication development I. Aliska et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105214
2. Reconstruction of flood events based on documentary data and transnational flood risk analysis of the Upper Rhine and its French and German tributaries since AD 1480 I. Himmelsbach et al. 10.5194/hess-19-4149-2015
3. The FLOod Probability Interpolation Tool (FLOPIT): A Simple Tool to Improve Spatial Flood Probability Quantification and Communication M. Zarekarizi et al. 10.3390/w13050666
4. La simplification des Atlas de Zones Inondables par approche hydrogéomorphologique : une nécessité pour la pérennité de la méthode A. Montané et al. 10.4000/cybergeo.28557
5. Understanding practical challenges to risk and vulnerability assessments: the case of Swedish municipalities A. Cedergren et al. 10.1080/13669877.2018.1485169
6. READY: a web-based geographical information system for enhanced flood resilience through raising awareness in citizens R. Albano et al. 10.5194/nhess-15-1645-2015
7. The influence of tailored risk communication on individual adaptive behaviour M. Attems et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101618
8. Flood mitigation data analytics and decision support framework: Iowa Middle Cedar Watershed case study Y. Alabbad et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152768
9. Flood risk assessment – Practices in flood prone Swedish municipalities V. Norén et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.07.003
10. An opportunity missed is an opportunity lost. Flood maps and their (non-)utilization by local government bodies in the Czech Republic K. Klemešová et al. 10.2478/mgr-2024-0011
11. What Role for Public Participation in Implementing the EU Floods Directive? A Comparison With the Water Framework Directive, Early Evidence from Germany and a Research Agenda J. Newig et al. 10.1002/eet.1650
12. Is a picture worth a thousand words? Evaluating the effectiveness of maps for delivering wildfire warning information Y. Cao et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.012
13. Flood insurance rate map for non-structural mitigation R. Roslan et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/20197603002
14. Using maps to communicate environmental exposures and health risks: Review and best-practice recommendations D. Stieb et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.049
15. Zielgruppenspezifische Darstellung von Hochwassergefahren und -risiko M. Wenk et al. 10.1007/s00506-018-0470-z
16. FloodRisk: a collaborative, free and open-source software for flood risk analysis R. Albano et al. 10.1080/19475705.2017.1388854
17. Flood Maps in the Czech Republic: Content, Perception and Information value K. Klemešová et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/20160710006
18. Household flood risk response in San Francisco Bay: linking risk information, perception, and behavior C. Huang & M. Lubell 10.1007/s10113-022-01875-6
19. Evaluating hazard, vulnerability, and capacity through local knowledge for volcano risk reduction P. Wijayanti et al. 10.4102/jamba.v17i1.1876
20. Development of methodology for quantitative landslide risk assessment—Example Göta river valley Y. Andersson-Sköld et al. 10.4236/ns.2014.63018
21. The Influence of Hazard Maps and Trust of Flood Controls on Coastal Flood Spatial Awareness and Risk Perception D. Houston et al. 10.1177/0013916517748711
22. Enhancing flash flood risk perception and awareness of mitigation actions through risk communication: A pre-post survey design J. Bodoque et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.007
23. Communicating disaster risk? An evaluation of the availability and quality of flood maps D. Henstra et al. 10.5194/nhess-19-313-2019
24. Difficulties in explaining complex issues with maps: evaluating seismic hazard communication – the Swiss case M. Marti et al. 10.5194/nhess-19-2677-2019