45 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A multilevel fluid/structure model for predicting the damage behavior induced by flash floods in masonry structures U. De Maio et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2024.11.101
2. Bayesian networks for assessment of disruption to school systems under combined hazards A. Vatteri et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102924
3. Probabilistic Fire Risk Framework for Optimizing Construction Site Layout R. El Meouche et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104065
4. Vulnerability and Resilience under Effects of Tsunamis: Case of Industrial Plants A. Mebarki et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.520
5. Resilience: Theory and metrics – A metal structure as demonstrator A. Mebarki https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.026
6. Optimal construction site layout based on risk spatial variability M. Abune'meh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.06.014
7. Emergency management and urban resilience under seismic risks. Part II: validation and sensitivity analysis for buildings seismic damage evaluation A. Mebarki & S. Jerez https://doi.org/10.48130/emst-0024-0025
8. Assessing the spatiotemporal impact of users’ exposure and vulnerability to flood risk in urban built environments G. Bernardini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105043
9. Study of optimal layout based on integrated probabilistic framework (IPF): Case of a crude oil tank farm M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.04.025
10. Flood risk assessment of cultural heritage at large spatial scales: Framework and application to mainland Portugal R. Figueiredo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.11.007
11. A framework for the simplified risk analysis of cultural heritage assets X. Romão et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.05.007
12. From single- to multi-hazard vulnerability and risk in Historic Urban Areas: a literature review P. Julià & T. Ferreira https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04734-5
13. Resilience in flood risk management – Exploring its added value for science and practice J. Schanze et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160708003
14. Thermal risk in batch reactors: Theoretical framework for runaway and accident L. Ni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2016.04.004
15. The Asynergies of Structural Disaster Risk Reduction Measures: Comparing Floods and Earthquakes M. de Ruiter et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001531
16. On the quality of buildings and construction projects: metrics and process dynamics G. Thing Leo et al. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.011
17. How much do users matter? An integrated method for building flood vulnerability and exposure assessment in Historic Urban Areas G. Sparvoli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.107084
18. Assessing Different Flood Risk and Damage Approaches: A Case of Study in Progreso, Yucatan, Mexico W. Rey et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8020137
19. A simplified approach for flood vulnerability assessment of historic sites F. Miranda & T. Ferreira https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-03565-1
20. Flood vulnerability assessment of built cultural heritage: Literature review and identification of indicators L. Salazar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104666
21. Safety of atmospheric industrial tanks: Fragility, resilience and recovery functions A. Mebarki https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.06.007
22. Understanding flood risk in urban environments: spatial analysis of building vulnerability and hazard areas in the Lisbon metropolitan area P. Santos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06731-w
23. A Review of the Use of Titanium for Reinforcement of Masonry Structures F. Haile et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134561
24. Rapid Earthquake Loss Estimation Model for Algerian Urban Heritage: Case of Blida City M. Boukri et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2021.1958394
25. A new approach to flood vulnerability assessment for historic buildings in England V. Stephenson & D. D'Ayala https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1035-2014
26. SVM application in hazard assessment: Self-heating for sulfurized rust Z. Dou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.11.011
27. Indicator-based approach for the assessment of intrinsic physical vulnerability of the built environment to hydro-meteorological hazards: Review of indicators and example of parameters selection for a sample area R. Agliata et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102199
28. A rapid numerical-based vulnerability assessment method for masonry buildings subject to flood G. Capparelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104001
29. Nonlinear Simulation and Vulnerability Analysis of Masonry Structures Impacted by Flash Floods Q. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6682234
30. The March 2015 catastrophic flood event and its impacts in the city of Copiapó (southern Atacama Desert). An integrated analysis to mitigate future mudflow derived damages T. Izquierdo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102975
31. Critical infrastructure resilience: a guide for building indicator systems based on a multi-criteria framework with a focus on implementable actions Z. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3723-2024
32. An Integrated Approach for Assessing Flood Risk in Historic City Centres T. Ferreira & P. Santos https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061648
33. Semi-batch reactors: Thermal runaway risk L. Ni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2016.07.024
34. Thermal Runaway Risk of Semibatch Processes: Esterification Reaction with Autocatalytic Behavior L. Ni et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b03100
35. Emergency management and urban resilience under seismic risks. Part I: Theoretical approach for quick post-quake damage evaluation of buildings A. Mebarki et al. https://doi.org/10.48130/emst-0024-0027
36. Analysis of the Hazard, Vulnerability, and Exposure to the Risk of Flooding (Alba de Yeltes, Salamanca, Spain) S. Veleda et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7020157
37. A Scientometric Review of Urban Disaster Resilience Research H. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073677
38. Flood vulnerability and risk assessment of historic urban areas: Vulnerability evaluation, derivation of depth‐damage curves and cost–benefit analysis of flood adaptation measures applied to the historic city centre of Tomar, Portugal L. Davis et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12908
39. A multi-criteria framework for critical infrastructure systems resilience Z. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2023.100616
40. The impact of the aggregation formula on indicator-based method for the assessment of building susceptibility to hydro-meteorological hazards R. Agliata et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102850
41. Structural Response of Masonry Infilled Timber Frames to Flood and Wind Driven Rain Exposure V. Stephenson & D. D’Ayala https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001281
42. Measurement of city road network resilience in hazardous flood events M. M.S. et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-11-2021-0155
43. Developing Optimal Paths for Evacuating Risky Construction Sites R. El Meouche et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001413
44. A case study for emergency management and urban resilience under seismic risks. Part III: an integrated digital platform for Digital Inspection and Monitoring Assistant (DIMA) A. Mebarki et al. https://doi.org/10.48130/emst-0024-0028
45. The KULTURisk Regional Risk Assessment methodology for water-related natural hazards – Part 1: Physical–environmental assessment P. Ronco et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5399-2014