28 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF CONFINED ADOBE MASONRY STRUCTURES M. Ahmad et al. https://doi.org/10.35453/NEDJR-STMECH-2020-0004
2. Experimental assessment of proposed seismic strengthening scheme for adobe structures M. Rafi et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332221114072
3. Comparison of Seismic Performance of Adobe Structures Strengthened with Two Different Schemes M. Rafi & M. Khan https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2024.2354862
4. Seismic performance of adobe construction M. Rafi & H. Varum https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1278996
5. Feasibility Study of Affordable Earth Masonry Housing in the U.S. Gulf Coast Region N. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000311
6. Seismic performance evaluation of unreinforced masonry school buildings in Turkey S. Yılmaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546312453190
7. Damages to unreinforced masonry buildings by the Van earthquakes of 23 October and 9 November 2011 Y. Tama et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-329-2013
8. Effect of restoration interventions on the seismic behavior of historical masonry buildings: The case of Molla Siyah mosque İ. Kocaman https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107206
9. Field Reconnaissance of the October 23, 2011, Van, Turkey, Earthquake: Lessons from Structural Damages O. Murat https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000532
10. Shaking table study on rubber-sand mixture cored composite block as low-cost isolation bearing for rural houses F. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107413
11. DEPREM MEVZUATI BAĞLAMINDA TÜRKİYE’DEKİ GELENEKSEL AHŞAP KARKAS YAPI KURALLARININ ANALİZİ E. Avlar & H. Yıldırım https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.723316
12. Experimental Assessment of Mechanical Properties of Adobe Masonry M. Rafi et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-15430
13. Post-earthquake damage assessments of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings by shake table test and numerical visualization A. Kaya et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106858
14. Seismic vulnerability assessment of building stock of Malakand (Pakistan) using FEMA P-154 method S. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1681-z
15. Seismic Performance and Strengthening of Purlin Roof Structures Using a Novel Damping-Limit Device B. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.722018
16. Adobe buildings damaged during Kovancılar (Elazığ) earthquake on March 8, 2010 and their earthquake resistances M. Sunkar & H. Aksoy https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0400-8
17. Modelling and Experimental Study of Mechanical Behaviour of Walls Produced by Different Knitting M. Kamanli et al. https://doi.org/10.3139/120.110240
18. Seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings in high-risk areas: A modified rapid visual screening approach in Pakistan K. Shahzada et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdd.2025.100018
19. Development of building inventory for northern Pakistan for seismic risk reduction M. Rafi et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-05-2015-0028
20. Post-Earthquake Damage Assessment Process and Problems in Turkey – A Case Study in Van Province D. Yilmaz et al. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.569-570.310
21. Iranian ‘staircase’ villages: structural and seismic issues R. Akbari & Y. Rafiei https://doi.org/10.1680/jmuen.16.00012
22. Field Investigation of the Performance of Unreinforced Masonry Building Structures during the June 12, 2017, Lesvos Earthquake in the Aegean Sea C. Göçer https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001497
23. Seismic behavior of masonry walls strengthened by precast reinforced concrete panels with different connection details Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112597
24. Experimental and numerical investigation of walls strengthened with fiber plaster H. Basaran et al. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.56.2.189
25. Rubber-sand infilled soilbags as seismic isolation cushions: experimental validation J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.23.00158
26. Failure analysis and performance of compact and slender carved stone walls under compression and seismic loading by the FEM approach A. Preciado & S. Sperbeck https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.11.009
27. Seismic response of reduced scale stone masonry building M. Rafi et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.16.00031
28. Stacking risk: The growing seismic vulnerability of self-built housing in Mexican colonias C. Medel-Vera et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pau.2025.100047