27 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Retrospective investigation of geomagnetic field time-series during the 2009 L'Aquila seismic sequence F. Masci & M. Di Persio 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.01.008
2. Relation between the energy of earthquake swarm and the Hurst exponent of random variations of the geomagnetic field M. Hayakawa et al. 10.1016/j.pce.2003.07.001
3. Use of wavelet analysis for detection of seismogenic ULF emissions L. Alperovich et al. 10.1029/2002RS002687
4. Fractal characteristics of the ground-observed ULF emissions in relation to geomagnetic and seismic activities N. Smirnova & M. Hayakawa 10.1016/j.jastp.2007.08.001
5. Fractal characteristics of the ULF emissions along a meridian profile, based on the 210 MM stations data A. Varlamov et al. 10.2478/s11600-012-0035-7
6. Strong earthquakes associated with high amplitude daily geomagnetic variations T. Rabeh et al. 10.1007/s11069-009-9449-1
7. Fractal analysis of the ground-recorded ULF magnetic fields prior to the 11 March 2011 Tohoku earthquake (M W = 9): discriminating possible earthquake precursors from space-sourced disturbances S. Potirakis et al. 10.1007/s11069-016-2558-8
8. ULF/ELF ionospheric electric field and plasma perturbations related to Chile earthquakes X. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2010.11.001
9. Anomalous ULF Geomagnetic Anomalies Associated with the June 14, 2020 Earthquake (M = 5.3) in Kachchh, Gujarat Region (India) C. Simha & K. Rao 10.1134/S001685212470016X
10. Probing the lower ionospheric perturbations associated with earthquakes by means of subionospheric VLF/LF propagation M. Hayakawa 10.1007/s11589-011-0823-1
11. Multifractal fluctuations in earthquake-related geoelectrical signals L. Telesca et al. 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/214
12. Fractal analysis for VHF electromagnetic noises and the identification of preseismic signature of an earthquake N. Yonaiguchi et al. 10.1016/j.jastp.2007.08.002
13. Analysis of space- and ground-based parameters prior to an earthquake on 12 December 2009 S. Karia et al. 10.1080/01431161.2013.827341
14. Ultra-Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Emissions Associated with Earthquakes M. Hayakawa & K. Hattori 10.1541/ieejfms.124.1101
15. Disturbance identification of electric field data observed by the CSES-01 satellite before earthquakes J. Huang et al. 10.1007/s11430-022-1048-8
16. Are there new findings in the search for ULF magnetic precursors to earthquakes? F. Masci & J. Thomas 10.1002/2015JA021336
17. Looking for Earthquake Precursors From Space: A Critical Review P. Picozza et al. 10.3389/feart.2021.676775
18. Determination of geometric parameters of fracture networks using 1D data T. Tóth 10.1016/j.jsg.2009.04.006
19. Fractal Analysis of VLF Electric Field Changes Observed at Mathura in Relation to Moderate Shallow Earthquakes (M = 4.9–5.6, depth < 17 Km) Happened in India and Around R. Singh et al. 10.1134/S0016793224601005
20. Ultra-low frequency (ULF) magnetic field emissions associated with some major earthquakes occurred in Indian Subcontinent . Swati et al. 10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105469
21. Fractal analysis of ULF electromagnetic emissions in possible association with earthquakes in China Y. Ida et al. 10.5194/npg-19-577-2012
22. Statistical behavior of the spectral exponent and the correlation time of electric self-potential time series associated to the Ms=7.4 September 14, 1995 earthquake in Mexico A. Ramı́rez-Rojas et al. 10.1016/j.pce.2003.10.001
23. Multifractal Analysis for the ULF Geomagnetic Data during the Guam Earthquake Y. Ida et al. 10.1541/ieejfms.126.215
24. The construction of an Ito model for geoelectrical signals Z. Czechowski & L. Telesca 10.1016/j.physa.2011.02.049
25. Study of GPS-TEC related to Wenchuan earthquake (M=7.9) of 12 May 2008 and their fractal analysis V. Chauhan et al. 10.1541/jae.30.63
26. On the multi-fractal characteristics of the ULF geomagnetic field before the 1993 Guam earthquake F. Masci 10.5194/nhess-13-187-2013
27. Fractal analysis of Ultra Low Frequency magnetic field emissions observed at Agra associated with two major earthquakes occurred in Pakistan . Swati et al. 10.1541/jae.39.1