the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Failure modes of loose landslide deposits in 2008 Wenchuan earthquake area in China
Abstract. In this study, a geological investigation and statistical analysis of the post-earthquake slope deposit failures in a meizoseismal area were presented, with a selected example from the 2008 Ms 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake occurred in Sichuan Province in China. The typical slope deposit failures were surveyed in three meizoseismal areas, namely Qingchuan county in Guangyuan city, Beichuan county in Mianyang city, and the epicenter area, Wenchuan county in Aba Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. According to the movement, material and deformation mechanism of rock or soil, the failures of the post-earthquake landslide deposit could be subdivided into four categories, i.e. slide, collapse, erosion and flow. This classification of failures of landslide deposit considers the topographic and failure after the earthquake. Besides, some other important factors such as topography, lithology and hydrogeology are also considered. The above mentioned four failure categories are further split into 12 sub-classification. The complicated deformation mechanism and different failure patterns of the slope deposits are analyzed in typical deposits. This classification provides a good reference for the prediction of geological hazards, whereas mitigation of the landslide or debris flows caused by loose deposits in the meizoseismal area is still a difficult task.
- Preprint
(2499 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
-
RC1: 'not acceptable in the current version', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Jun 2019
- AC1: 'Thanks Anonymous Referee #1', Jianjun Gan, 17 Jun 2019
- AC4: 'Response to Anonymous Referee #1', Jianjun Gan, 14 Sep 2019
-
SC1: 'The core landslide distribution map is totally wrong', Chong Xu, 16 Jun 2019
- AC2: 'Many thanks to Dr. Xu', Jianjun Gan, 17 Jun 2019
- AC5: 'Response to Dr. Xu Chong', Jianjun Gan, 14 Sep 2019
-
RC2: 'Lack of a clear and novel focus', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 Jul 2019
- SC2: 'Explanation of the Revision2', Jianjun Gan, 02 Aug 2019
- AC3: 'Response to Anonymous Referee #2', Jianjun Gan, 14 Sep 2019
- AC6: 'Final revised manuscript (complete)', Jianjun Gan, 14 Sep 2019
-
RC1: 'not acceptable in the current version', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Jun 2019
- AC1: 'Thanks Anonymous Referee #1', Jianjun Gan, 17 Jun 2019
- AC4: 'Response to Anonymous Referee #1', Jianjun Gan, 14 Sep 2019
-
SC1: 'The core landslide distribution map is totally wrong', Chong Xu, 16 Jun 2019
- AC2: 'Many thanks to Dr. Xu', Jianjun Gan, 17 Jun 2019
- AC5: 'Response to Dr. Xu Chong', Jianjun Gan, 14 Sep 2019
-
RC2: 'Lack of a clear and novel focus', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 Jul 2019
- SC2: 'Explanation of the Revision2', Jianjun Gan, 02 Aug 2019
- AC3: 'Response to Anonymous Referee #2', Jianjun Gan, 14 Sep 2019
- AC6: 'Final revised manuscript (complete)', Jianjun Gan, 14 Sep 2019
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
730 | 384 | 52 | 1,166 | 62 | 54 |
- HTML: 730
- PDF: 384
- XML: 52
- Total: 1,166
- BibTeX: 62
- EndNote: 54
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1