Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2017-435
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2017-435

  15 Jan 2018

15 Jan 2018

Status: this preprint has been retracted.

Seismic vulnerability of vernacular Newari buildings in Nepal: observations and analysis of damage due to 1934, 1988, 2011, and 2015 earthquakes

Dipendra Gautam1,2 and Hugo Rodrigues3 Dipendra Gautam and Hugo Rodrigues
  • 1Structural and Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (SERI), Kathmandu, Nepal
  • 2School of Engineering, Pokhara University, Kaski, Nepal
  • 3RISCO, School of Technology and Management, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal

Abstract. This paper reports the seismic vulnerability of vernacular Newari buildings based on the damage observations during four major earthquakes (1934, 1988, 2011 and 2015) that struck Bhaktapur city. Some specific features that contributed to collapse prevention in traditional masonry buildings are also highlighted in this paper. In this paper, we have outlined the insights of each earthquake using forensic interpretations and the recommendations by various researchers after 1934 and 1988 earthquakes are compared in terms of their implementation. With the help of damage database recorded during 1934, 1988 and 2015 earthquakes, we have created damage probability matrices and empirical fragility functions for traditional masonry structures. The fragility functions and damage probability matrices derived in this study highlight that most of the vernacular Newari buildings are likely to be collapsed in the case of strong to major earthquakes.

This preprint has been retracted.

Dipendra Gautam and Hugo Rodrigues

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Dipendra Gautam and Hugo Rodrigues

Dipendra Gautam and Hugo Rodrigues

Viewed

Total article views: 969 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
585 344 40 969 28 35
  • HTML: 585
  • PDF: 344
  • XML: 40
  • Total: 969
  • BibTeX: 28
  • EndNote: 35
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jan 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jan 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 858 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 840 with geography defined and 18 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 15 Jun 2021
Download

This preprint has been retracted.

Altmetrics