72 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Tsunami vulnerability assessment in the Southern Boso Peninsula, Japan G. Voulgaris & Y. Murayama https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.08.001
2. Benchmarking household storm surge risk perceptions to scientific models in the Philippines A. Opdyke et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05425-5
3. Assessing physical vulnerability in large cities exposed to flash floods and debris flows: the case of Arequipa (Peru) J. Thouret et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1172-x
4. Geospatial mapping of Tsunami susceptibility of Karachi to Gwadar coastal area of Pakistan B. Aslam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05916-4
5. Deep Learning–Based Building Attribute Estimation from Google Street View Images for Flood Risk Assessment Using Feature Fusion and Task Relation Encoding F. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0001025
6. Empirical building fragilities from observed damage in the 2009 South Pacific tsunami S. Reese et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.01.009
7. Application and Comparison of Tsunami Vulnerability and Damage Models for the Town of Siracusa, Sicily, Italy G. Pagnoni & S. Tinti https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-016-1261-8
8. Flood vulnerability assessment of urban buildings based on integrating high-resolution remote sensing and street view images Z. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104467
9. Vulnerability curves vs. vulnerability indicators: application of an indicator-based methodology for debris-flow hazards M. Papathoma-Köhle https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1771-2016
10. A review of tsunami vulnerability assessment: focus on human indicator N. Nik Effendi & M. Abdul Khanan https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08128-3
11. Enhancing a Coastal Territorial Vulnerability Index: Anticipating the Impacts of Coastal Flooding with a Local Scale Approach J. Barros et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2022.2107858
12. Analysis and validation of the PTVA tsunami building vulnerability model using the 2015 Chile post-tsunami damage data in Coquimbo and La Serena cities T. Izquierdo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1703-2018
13. Establishing factors of building vulnerability towards tsunami hazard L. Honesti et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925803011
14. Tsunami Vulnerability Evaluation for a Small Ancient Village on Eastern Sicily Coast C. Lo Re et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10020268
15. Simplified automatic prediction of the level of damage to similar buildings affected by river flood in a specific area D. Marín-García et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104251
16. Assessment of Building Vulnerability to Tsunami in Ancon Bay, Peru, Using High-Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery and Numerical Simulation C. Davila et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9060402
17. Revised MeTHuVA method for assessment of tsunami human vulnerability of Bakirkoy district, Istanbul D. Tufekci et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3082-1
18. Improving occupational health and safety risk evaluation through decision analysis M. Oliveira et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12339
19. Remote sensing and spatial multi-criteria analysis for tsunami vulnerability assessment A. Bakar Sambah & F. Miura https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-05-2013-0082
20. Towards a wildfire vulnerability index using expert judgement M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF24114
21. Building damage from the 2011 Great East Japan tsunami: quantitative assessment of influential factors N. Leelawat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1081-z
22. The Tsunami Vulnerability Assessment of Urban Environments through Freely Available Datasets: The Case Study of Napoli City (Southern Italy) I. Alberico et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse3030981
23. Tsunamis and rapid coastal remodeling: Linking energy and fractal dimension C. Donadio et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133319893924
24. Tsunami Risk Management in Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs): Some Issues, Challenges and Ways Forward D. Dominey-Howes & J. Goff https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0490-8
25. Projecting community changes in hazard exposure to support long-term risk reduction: A case study of tsunami hazards in the U.S. Pacific Northwest B. Sleeter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.02.015
26. A 3-tier tsunami vulnerability assessment technique for the north-west coast of Peninsular Malaysia H. Ismail et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0166-9
27. Assessing building vulnerability to tsunami using the PTVA-3 model: A case study of Chabahar Bay, Iran S. Madani et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2567-7
28. GIS mapping of tsunami vulnerability: Case study of the Jembrana regency in Bali, Indonesia T. Sinaga et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-011-0741-8
29. The importance of indicator weights for vulnerability indices and implications for decision making in disaster management M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101103
30. Spatial model of vulnerability to tsunami in Buleleng Sub-district M. Wetty & E. Kusratmoko https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/561/1/012048
31. Sensitivity analysis of a built environment exposed to the synthetic monophasic viscous debris flow impacts with 3-D numerical simulations X. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-871-2023
32. An assessment of building vulnerability to a tsunami in the Galle coastal area, Sri Lanka N. Sathiparan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100952
33. Fragility Curves Based on Data from the 2011 Tohoku‐Oki Tsunami in Ishinomaki City, with Discussion of Parameters Influencing Building Damage A. Suppasri et al. https://doi.org/10.1193/053013EQS138M
34. A generic physical vulnerability model for floods: review and concept for data-scarce regions M. Malgwi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2067-2020
35. Quelles sont les leçons tirées du tsunami de 2004 ? Exemple du secteur touristique de Koh Phi Phi (Thaïlande) A. Coulon et al. https://doi.org/10.4000/15c8w
36. Development of a Relative Vulnerability Index (RVI) for Estimation of Building Vulnerability towards Tsunami Hazard L. Honesti et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821501037
37. Assessment of Building Vulnerability to Tsunami Hazard in Kamari (Santorini Island, Greece) D. Batzakis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8110886
38. Vulnerability of Buildings to Meteorological Hazards: A Web-Based Application Using an Indicator-Based Approach M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106253
39. The exposure of Sydney (Australia) to earthquake-generated tsunamis, storms and sea level rise: a probabilistic multi-hazard approach F. Dall'Osso et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07401
40. A deterministic approach for assessing tsunami-induced building damage through quantification of hydrodynamic forces Y. Xiong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.11.002
41. The evaluation of public awareness and community preparedness parameter in GIS-based spatial tsunami human vulnerability assessment (MeTHuVA) D. Tufekci-Enginar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04416-8
42. Multidimensional Approach for Tsunami Vulnerability Assessment: Framing the Territorial Impacts in Two Municipalities in Portugal A. Tavares et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12678
43. Population and building vulnerability assessment by possible worst-case tsunami scenarios in Salinas, Ecuador T. Vera San Martín et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3300-5
44. An assessment of the tsunami risk in Muscat and Salalah, Oman, based on estimations of probable maximum loss J. Browning & N. Thomas https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.02.002
45. Comparative tsunami vulnerability assessment of an urban area: An analysis of Setúbal city, Portugal A. Santos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.08.009
46. Assessment of the Physical Vulnerability of Vernacular Architecture to Meteorological Hazards Using an Indicator-Based Approach: The Case of the Kara Region in Northern Togo M. Awoussi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15132249
47. Study on the improvement of disaster resistance against tsunamis at Taiwan’s Keelung Port C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05000-4
48. Derivation of tsunami damage curves from fragility functions W. Dias & U. Edirisooriya https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03601-8
49. Tangible and intangible ex post assessment of flood-induced damage to cultural heritage C. De Lucia et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4317-2024
50. The use of empirical vulnerability functions to assess the response of buildings to tsunami impact: Comparative review and summary of best practice C. Tarbotton et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.01.002
51. Experimental and Numerical Study on Tsunami-Like Flow Impact on Fujairah Port Breakwater N. Nandasena et al. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431124500246
52. GIS-based techniques for assessing the vulnerability of buildings to tsunami: current approaches and future steps C. Tarbotton et al. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP361.10
53. Expert-based versus data-driven flood damage models: A comparative evaluation for data-scarce regions M. Malgwi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102148
54. A framework for pluvial flood risk assessment in Alexandria considering the coping capacity B. Elboshy et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9684-7
55. Impact Forecasting to Support Emergency Management of Natural Hazards B. Merz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000704
56. On the Possible Origins of an Unusual (Mid to Late Holocene) Coastal Deposit, Old Punt Bay, South-East Australia A. SWITZER et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2011.00700.x
57. Vulnerability indicators for natural hazards: an innovative selection and weighting approach M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50257-2
58. Tsunami Vulnerability Assessment and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Analysis of Eastern Coast of India Using GIS-Based Tools S. Biswas & A. Sil https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-1493-y
59. Analysis of tsunami disaster mitigation priority on urban area settlement W. Soviana et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1140/1/012022
60. Seismic and Coastal Vulnerability Assessment Model for Buildings in Chile C. Quiñones-Bustos et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11030107
61. Scenarios of Earthquake and Tsunami Damage Probability in Callao Region, Peru Using Tsunami Fragility Functions B. Adriano et al. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2014.p0968
62. Integrated GIS, Remote Sensing and Survey Data for Damage Assessment of Buildings in Tsunami Event, Ishinomaki City, Japan M. Poursaber & Y. Ariki https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2016.82023
63. Tsunami impact and vulnerability in the harbour area of Tangier, Morocco S. Benchekroun et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2013.858373
64. A wildfire vulnerability index for buildings M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10479-3
65. Revision and improvement of the PTVA-3 model for assessing tsunami building vulnerability using “international expert judgment”: introducing the PTVA-4 model F. Dall’Osso et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2387-9
66. A method for determining the suitability of schools as evacuation shelters and aid distribution hubs following disasters: case study from Cagayan de Oro, Philippines A. Tsioulou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04380-3
67. MACBETH C. BANA E COSTA et al. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622012400068
68. A Review of Structural Vulnerability Assessment Methods in the Advent of a Tsunami A. Baouham et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450203013
69. Territorial Vulnerability Assessment Supporting Risk Managing Coastal Areas Due to Tsunami Impact J. Barros et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7094971
70. A REVIEW OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS FOR BUILDING ASSESSMENT, SELECTION, AND RETROFIT P. Villalba et al. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2024.21621
71. Scenario-based tsunami risk assessment using a static flooding approach and high-resolution digital elevation data: An example from Muscat in Oman B. Schneider et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.02.005
72. Assessing physical vulnerability for multi-hazards using an indicator-based methodology M. Kappes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.07.002