74 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Karst Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment (KAVA) Method—A Novel GIS-Based Method for Deep Karst Aquifers R. Biondić et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063325
2. Evaluating acceptability of groundwater protection measures under different agricultural policies R. Giordano et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.023
3. Monitoring and Management of Karstic Coastal Groundwater in a Changing Environment (Southern Italy): A Review of a Regional Experience M. Polemio https://doi.org/10.3390/w8040148
4. Development of a new P3 (Probability, Protection, and Precipitation) method for vulnerability, hazard, and risk intensity index assessments in karst watersheds T. Sullivan & Y. Gao https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.007
5. Groundwater vulnerability to pollution mapping of Ranchi district using GIS R. Krishna et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-014-0198-2
6. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using SINTACS and modified-SINTACS methods in Burdur Çine Basin (Turkiye) I. Soyaslan https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v29n2.114091
7. An Agricultural Decision Support System for Optimal Land Use Regarding Groundwater Vulnerability K. Voudouris et al. https://doi.org/10.4018/jissc.2010100105
8. A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability of Katri Watershed, Dhanbad, India A. Ghosh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0009-2
9. Evaluation of index-overlay methods for groundwater vulnerability and risk assessment in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal S. Shrestha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.141
10. A Novel Approach to Harmonize Vulnerability Assessment in Carbonate and Detrital Aquifers at Basin Scale L. Baena-Ruiz & D. Pulido-Velazquez https://doi.org/10.3390/w12112971
11. A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer susceptibility of Safdarabad Tehsil, Sheikhupura District, Punjab Province, Pakistan B. Aslam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00735-8
12. The EPIK multi-attribute method for intrinsic vulnerability assessment of karstic aquifer under semi-arid climatic conditions, case of Cheria Plateau, NE Algeria A. Nekkoub et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05704-0
13. Groundwater vulnerability to pollution in karst aquifers, considering key challenges and considerations: application to the Ubrique springs in southern Spain A. Marín et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02279-8
14. Synthesizing existing frameworks to identify the potential for Managed Aquifer Recharge in a karstic and semi-arid region using GIS Multi Criteria Decision Analysis S. Fathi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100390
15. Groundwater vulnerability assessment using modified SINTACS model in Wadi Shueib, Jordan M. Awawdeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2020.1773535
16. Aquifer Vulnerability: Its Protection and Management—A Case Study in Pangkalpinang City, Indonesia G. Nugraha et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8887914
17. Assessing groundwater vulnerability by pollution mapping in Iran: Case study Hamadan – Bahar plain B. Oroji https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.2018.57.3.2108
18. Evaluation of Groundwater Vulnerability in the Lower Varuna Catchment Area, Uttar Pradesh, India using AVI Concept N. Raju et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-014-0039-9
19. Groundwater vulnerability in karst area Pucung Village, Eromoko, Wonogiri District U. Syahidin et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/824/1/012034
20. Development of hierarchical fuzzy model for groundwater vulnerability to pollution assessment J. Iqbal et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1417-8
21. Methods for Assessing the Protection (Vulnerability) of Groundwater I. Kozlov & I. Chesnokova https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807826600580
22. Geographical detection of groundwater pollution vulnerability and hazard in karst areas of Guangxi Province, China Z. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.017
23. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the Yinchuan Plain, Northwest China using OREADIC H. Qian et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2211-7
24. Avaliação da vulnerabilidade e do risco à contaminação das águas subterrâneas da bacia hidrográfica do rio Gramame (PB) F. Linhares et al. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-451320140110
25. A Hybrid Prediction Model for Monitoring of River Water Quality in the USN System H. Kim & M. Kim https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/849287
26. GIS modeling approach for assessment of groundwater vulnerability in parts of Tawa river catchment area, Hoshangabad, Madhya Pradesh, India M. Malik & J. Shukla https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100249
27. Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a GIS-based modified DRASTIC model: the case of the Borkena Subbasin, Awash River, Ethiopia M. Kebede Ayele et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-025-12330-1
28. Proposed APLIE method for groundwater vulnerability assessment in karst-phreatic aquifer, Shandong Province, China: a case study Y. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4903-8
29. Carbonate Coastal Aquifer of Vlora Bay and Groundwater Submarine Discharge (Southwestern Albania) M. Polemio et al. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI_58_4
30. Groundwater protection under water scarcity; from regional risk assessment to local wastewater treatment solutions in Jordan M. Clemens et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136066
31. Eco-efficiency of agricultural water systems: Methodological approach and assessment at meso-level scale M. Todorovic et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.011
32. Application of the Risk‐Based Early Warning Method in a Fracture‐Karst Water Source, North China Y. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143017X15131012152771
33. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using GIS-based COP model in the northern governorates of Jordan M. Khazaa’lah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01486-4
34. Assessment and validation of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate and TDS using based on a modified DRASTIC model: a case study in the Erbil Central Sub-Basin, Iraq R. Smail & E. Dişli https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11165-1
35. Contribution of Groundwater Discharge to the Coastal Dissolved Nutrients and Trace Metal Concentrations in Majorca Island: Karstic vs Detrital Systems A. Tovar-Sánchez et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502958t
36. Assessment of groundwater contamination risk with scenario analysis of hazard quantification for a karst aquifer in Antalya, Turkey A. Çil et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-08932-5
37. Assessment and mapping of groundwater vulnerability to pollution: Current status and challenges D. Machiwal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.08.009
38. Karst groundwater vulnerability assessment: application of an integrative index-based approach to main catchments of middle Valseriana springs (Northern Italy) A. Citrini et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09860-8
39. Groundwater level prediction in Apulia region (Southern Italy) using NARX neural network F. Di Nunno & F. Granata https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110062
40. A GIS-based DRASTIC and GOD models for assessing alterites aquifer of three experimental watersheds in Foumban (Western-Cameroon) Z. Mfonka et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2018.06.006
41. COP*KAT: a modified COP vulnerability mapping method for karst terrains using KARSTLOP factors and fuzzy logic P. Ghezelayagh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09789-y
42. Toward operational methods for the assessment of intrinsic groundwater vulnerability: A review P. Wachniew et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2016.1160816
43. Can groundwater vulnerability models assess seawater intrusion? N. Momejian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.10.003
44. Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability in El-Bahariya Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt, using modelling and GIS techniques: A case study M. Masoud & M. El Osta https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0725-7
45. A comparison of methods for assessing groundwater vulnerability in karst aquifers: the case study of Terminio Mt. aquifer (Southern Italy) D. Cusano et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-023-00204-8
46. Intrinsic vulnerability assessment of Saturnia thermal aquifer by means of three parametric methods: SINTACS, GODS and COP E. Guastaldi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3191-z
47. A modified DRASTIC model for groundwater vulnerability assessment using connecting path and analytic hierarchy process methods A. Baki & S. Ghavami https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30201-8
48. Coupling Intrinsic Vulnerability Mapping and Tracer Test for Source Vulnerability and Risk Assessment in a Karst Catchment Based on EPIK Method: A Case Study for the Xingshan County, Southern China H. Jakada et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3392-y
49. DRASTIC, GOD, and SI approaches for assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution: a review A. Fannakh & A. Farsang https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00646-8
50. Modeling intrinsic vulnerability of complex karst aquifers: modifying the COP method to account for sinkhole density and fault location N. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-02056-2
51. Hydrogeochemical characteristics of groundwater from Zamrane region (Morocco) M. Ait-Tahar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-025-01099-9
52. Adapting the EPIK method to Brazilian Hydro(geo)logical context of the São Miguel watershed to assess karstic aquifer vulnerability to contamination D. Pereira et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2018.12.011
53. A GIS-based aquifer vulnerability assessment in the basement complex terrain of southwestern Nigeria A. Akinwumiju & M. Olorunfemi https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-017-0157-9
54. An improved groundwater vulnerability evaluation model based on random forest algorithm and spatio-temporal change prediction method B. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2025.106781
55. Assessment of Karst Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination as a Tool for Delineation of Source Protection Zones: A Case Study in the Crimean Mountains S. Tokarev et al. https://doi.org/10.2205/2024ES000953
56. An assessment of groundwater potential and vulnerability in the Upper Manyame Sub-Catchment of Zimbabwe A. Misi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2018.03.003
57. State of the art of karst vulnerability assessment: overview, evaluation and outlook V. Iván & J. Mádl-Szőnyi https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6422-2
58. A comprehensive review of groundwater vulnerability assessment using index-based, modelling, and coupling methods D. Goyal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113161
59. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability and risk to pollution in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal S. Shrestha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.021
60. Fuzzy-based spatial modeling approach to predict island karst distribution: a conceptual model H. Ho et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2543-4
61. Groundwater vulnerability mapping of Qatar aquifers H. Baalousha https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.09.017
62. Sensitivity of an integrated groundwater flow model to model parameters—application to vulnerability assessment of karst aquifers A. Kassem et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100737
63. Karst aquifer vulnerability assessment using the COP and EPIK methods in central Brazil A. Amaral et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-026-01329-8
64. Intrinsic Vulnerability Assessment of the Qingduo Karst System, Henan Province L. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15193425
65. Modified-DRASTIC, modified-SINTACS and SI methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment in the southern Tehran aquifer R. Noori et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2018.1537728
66. Sinkhole Flooding and Aquifer Recharge in Arid to Dry Sub-Humid Regions: A Systematic Review in the Perspective of Climate Change M. Delle Rose https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9020025
67. Groundwater vulnerability assessment in karstic aquifers using COP method S. Bagherzadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1911-8
68. Assessing groundwater vulnerability to contamination in an arid environment using DRASTIC and GOD models R. Ghazavi & Z. Ebrahimi https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0813-2
69. Next Stages in Aquifer Vulnerability Studies by Integrating Risk Indexing with Understanding Uncertainties by using Generalised Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation S. Sadeghfam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-021-00389-6
70. Groundwater Management Based on Vulnerability to Contamination in the Tropical Karst Region of Guntur Spring, Gunungsewu Karst, Java Island, Indonesia I. Riyanto et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-020-00460-5
71. Groundwater Vulnerability and Risk Assessment in A Karst Aquifer of Greece Using EPIK Method A. Vogelbacher et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6110116
72. Synthesizing vulnerability indices within a diverse lithological context: Corollaries for groundwater quality assurance and surface layer corrosiveness of Lokoja Geomaterials, Nigeria K. Ayua et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2024.201
73. Entropy weight method coupled with an improved DRASTIC model to evaluate the special vulnerability of groundwater in Songnen Plain, Northeastern China B. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2020.056
74. Global Review of Modification, Optimization, and Improvement Models for Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment in the Era of Climate Change M. Bordbar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-023-00192-2