Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
NHESS
Articles | Volume 25, issue 6
Articles | Volume 25, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1901-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1901-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 25, issue 6
Research article
 | 
06 Jun 2025
Research article |  | 06 Jun 2025

Comparative analysis of μ(I) and Voellmy-type grain flow rheologies in geophysical mass flows: insights from theoretical and real case studies

Yu Zhuang, Brian W. McArdell, and Perry Bartelt

Viewed

Total article views: 1,076 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
526 168 382 1,076 32 39
  • HTML: 526
  • PDF: 168
  • XML: 382
  • Total: 1,076
  • BibTeX: 32
  • EndNote: 39
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jul 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jul 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,076 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,003 with geography defined and 73 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 01 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
The experimentally based μ(I) rheology, widely used for gravitational mass flows, is reinterpreted as a Voellmy-type relationship to highlight its link to grain flow theory. Through block modeling and case studies, we establish its equivalence to μ(R) rheology. μ(I) models shear thinning but fails to capture acceleration and deceleration processes and deposit structure. Incorporating fluctuation energy in μ(R) improves accuracy, refining mass flow modeling and revealing practical challenges.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint