Articles | Volume 24, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-79-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-79-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Review article
| 
17 Jan 2024
Review article |
| 17 Jan 2024
| 17 Jan 2024
Review article: Current approaches and critical issues in multi-risk recovery planning of urban areas exposed to natural hazards
Soheil Mohammadi
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genoa, Genoa, 16145, Italy
Silvia De Angeli
Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genoa, Genoa, 16145, Italy
Giorgio Boni
Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genoa, Genoa, 16145, Italy
Francesca Pirlone
Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genoa, Genoa, 16145, Italy
Serena Cattari
Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genoa, Genoa, 16145, Italy
Related authors
No articles found.
Nicola Loglisci, Giorgio Boni, Arianna Cauteruccio, Francesco Faccini, Massimo Milelli, Guido Paliaga, and Antonio Parodi
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-24, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-24, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for NHESS
Short summary
Short summary
This research analyzes the meteo-hydrological features of August 27th and 28th 2023 event occurred in Genoa city. Rainfall observations were taken using either official or rain gauge networks based on citizen science. The combined analysis highlights a spatial variability of the precipitations, which cannot be captured by the current spatial density of the authoritative stations. Results show that at minimal distances the variations in cumulated rainfall over sub-hourly duration are significant.
Massimiliano Burlando, Djordje Romanic, Giorgio Boni, Martina Lagasio, and Antonio Parodi
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2019-371, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2019-371, 2019
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
This paper investigates the weather conditions during the collapse of the Morandi bridge, which caused 43 fatalities. Despite a thunderstorm developed over the city at the time of collapse, weather is officially ruled out as a contributing factor for it. A meteorological analysis is relevant to support this hypothesis or possibly reconsider it. The analysis, mainly based on measurements complemented with numerical simulations, reveals that quite strong winds occurred at the time of collapse.
Luca Cenci, Luca Pulvirenti, Giorgio Boni, Marco Chini, Patrick Matgen, Simone Gabellani, Giuseppe Squicciarino, and Nazzareno Pierdicca
Adv. Geosci., 44, 89–100, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-44-89-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-44-89-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This research aims at improving hydrological modelling skills of flash flood prediction by exploiting earth observation data. To this aim, high spatial/moderate temporal resolution soil moisture maps, derived from Sentinel 1 acquisitions, were used in a data assimilation framework. Findings revealed the potential of Sentinel 1-based soil moisture data assimilation for flash flood risk reduction and improved our understanding of the capabilities of the aforementioned satellite-derived product.
Antonio Parodi, Luca Ferraris, William Gallus, Maurizio Maugeri, Luca Molini, Franco Siccardi, and Giorgio Boni
Clim. Past, 13, 455–472, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-455-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-455-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Initial and boundary condition data from the 20th Century Reanalysis Project in ensemble mode are used to address the feasibility of performing cloud-resolving simulations with 1 km horizontal grid spacing of a historic extreme event that occurred over Liguria: the 1915 San Fruttuoso case. The proposed approach focuses on the ensemble Weather Research and Forecasting model runs that show strong convergence over the Ligurian Sea, as these runs are the ones most likely to best simulate the event.
F. Silvestro, S. Gabellani, R. Rudari, F. Delogu, P. Laiolo, and G. Boni
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1727–1751, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1727-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1727-2015, 2015
F. Silvestro, S. Gabellani, F. Delogu, R. Rudari, and G. Boni
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 39–62, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-39-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-39-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies, Socioeconomic and Management Aspects
Analysis of the effects of urban micro-scale vulnerabilities on tsunami evacuation using an agent-based model – case study in the city of Iquique, Chile
Factors of influence on flood risk perceptions related to Hurricane Dorian: an assessment of heuristics, time dynamics, and accuracy of risk perceptions
Anticipating a risky future: long short-term memory (LSTM) models for spatiotemporal extrapolation of population data in areas prone to earthquakes and tsunamis in Lima, Peru
A new regionally consistent exposure database for Central Asia: population and residential buildings
Study on seismic risk assessment model of water supply systems in mainland China
Mapping current and future flood exposure using a 5 m flood model and climate change projections
Brief communication: On the environmental impacts of the 2023 floods in Emilia-Romagna (Italy)
A regional-scale approach to assessing non-residential building, transportation and cropland exposure in Central Asia
Towards a global impact-based forecasting model for tropical cyclones
Quantitative Study of Storm Surge Risk Assessment in Undeveloped Coastal Area of China Based on Deep Learning and Geographic Information System (GIS) Techniques: A Case Study of Double-Moon Bay Zone
Identifying vulnerable populations in urban society: a case study in a flood-prone district of Wuhan, China
An assessment of potential improvements in social capital, risk awareness, and preparedness from digital technologies
Spatial accessibility of emergency medical services under inclement weather: a case study in Beijing, China
Estimating emergency costs for earthquakes and floods in Central Asia based on modelled losses
Compound flood impacts from Hurricane Sandy on New York City in climate-driven storylines
Risk reduction through managed retreat? Investigating enabling conditions and assessing resettlement effects on community resilience in Metro Manila
Regional-scale landslide risk assessment in Central Asia
Cost estimation for the monitoring instrumentation of landslide early warning systems
The role of response efficacy and self-efficacy in disaster preparedness actions for vulnerable households
Scientists as storytellers: the explanatory power of stories told about environmental crises
Back analysis of a building collapse under snow and rain loads in a Mediterranean area
Simulating multi-hazard event sets for life cycle consequence analysis
Assessment of building damage and risk under extreme flood scenarios in Shanghai
Micro business participation in collective flood adaptation. Lessons from scenario-based analysis in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Mangrove ecosystem properties regulate high water levels in a river delta
Analysis of flood warning and evacuation efficiency by comparing damage and life-loss estimates with real consequences related to the São Francisco tailings dam failure in Brazil
Brief communication: lessons learnt and experienced gained from building up a global survey on societal resilience to droughts
Multisectoral analysis of drought impacts and management responses to the 2008–2015 record drought in the Colorado Basin, Texas: A blueprint for regional multisectoral drought impact assessment
Criteria-based visualization design for hazard maps
Low-regret climate change adaptation in coastal megacities – evaluating large-scale flood protection and small-scale rainwater detention measures for Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Modeling compound flood risk and risk reduction using a globally applicable framework: a pilot in the Sofala province of Mozambique
Scenario-based multi-risk assessment from existing single-hazard vulnerability models. An application to consecutive earthquakes and tsunamis in Lima, Peru
Using machine learning algorithms to identify predictors of social vulnerability in the event of a hazard: Istanbul case study
Large-scale risk assessment on snow avalanche hazard in alpine regions
Unveiling Transboundary Challenges in The Ciliwung River Flood Management
Probabilistic and machine learning methods for uncertainty quantification in power outage prediction due to extreme events
Public intention to participate in sustainable geohazard mitigation: an empirical study based on an extended theory of planned behavior
An assessment of short–medium-term interventions using CAESAR-Lisflood in a post-earthquake mountainous area
Review article: Design and evaluation of weather index insurance for multi-hazard resilience and food insecurity
Design and application of a multi-hazard risk rapid assessment questionnaire for hill communities in the Indian Himalayan region
Identifying the drivers of private flood precautionary measures in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Performance of the flood warning system in Germany in July 2021 – insights from affected residents
Differences in volcanic risk perception among Goma's population before the Nyiragongo eruption of May 2021, Virunga volcanic province (DR Congo)
Empirical tsunami fragility modelling for hierarchical damage levels
Quantifying the potential benefits of risk-mitigation strategies on future flood losses in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal
Review article: Potential of nature-based solutions to mitigate hydro-meteorological risks in sub-Saharan Africa
Invited perspectives: An insurer's perspective on the knowns and unknowns in natural hazard risk modelling
Classifying marine faults for hazard assessment offshore Israel: a new approach based on fault size and vertical displacement
Assessing agriculture's vulnerability to drought in European pre-Alpine regions
Tsunami risk perception in central and southern Italy
Rodrigo Cienfuegos, Gonzalo Álvarez, Jorge León, Alejandro Urrutia, and Sebastián Castro
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1485–1500, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1485-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1485-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study carries out a detailed analysis of possible tsunami evacuation scenarios in the city of Iquique in Chile. Evacuation modeling and tsunami modeling are integrated, allowing for an estimation of the potential number of people that the inundation may reach under different scenarios by emulating the dynamics and behavior of the population and their decision-making regarding the starting time of the evacuation.
Laurine A. de Wolf, Peter J. Robinson, W. J. Wouter Botzen, Toon Haer, Jantsje M. Mol, and Jeffrey Czajkowski
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1303–1318, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1303-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1303-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
An understanding of flood risk perceptions may aid in improving flood risk communication. We conducted a survey among 871 coastal residents in Florida who were threatened to be flooded by Hurricane Dorian. Part of the original sample was resurveyed after Dorian failed to make landfall to investigate changes in risk perception. We find a strong influence of previous flood experience and social norms on flood risk perceptions. Furthermore, flood risk perceptions declined after the near-miss event.
Christian Geiß, Jana Maier, Emily So, Elisabeth Schoepfer, Sven Harig, Juan Camilo Gómez Zapata, and Yue Zhu
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1051–1064, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1051-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1051-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We establish a model of future geospatial population distributions to quantify the number of people living in earthquake-prone and tsunami-prone areas of Lima and Callao, Peru, for the year 2035. Areas of high earthquake intensity will experience a population growth of almost 30 %. The population in the tsunami inundation area is estimated to grow by more than 60 %. Uncovering those relations can help urban planners and policymakers to develop effective risk mitigation strategies.
Chiara Scaini, Alberto Tamaro, Baurzhan Adilkhan, Satbek Sarzhanov, Vakhitkhan Ismailov, Ruslan Umaraliev, Mustafo Safarov, Vladimir Belikov, Japar Karayev, and Ettore Faga
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 929–945, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-929-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-929-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Central Asia is highly exposed to multiple hazards, including earthquakes, floods and landslides, for which risk reduction strategies are currently under development. We provide a regional-scale database of assets at risk, including population and residential buildings, based on existing information and recent data collected for each Central Asian country. The population and number of buildings are also estimated for the year 2080 to support the definition of disaster risk reduction strategies.
Tianyang Yu, Banghua Lu, Hui Jiang, and Zhi Liu
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 803–822, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-803-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-803-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A basic database for seismic risk assessment of 720 urban water supply systems in mainland China is established. The parameters of the seismic risk curves of 720 cities are calculated. The seismic fragility curves of various facilities in the water supply system are given based on the logarithmic normal distribution model. The expected seismic loss and the expected loss rate index of 720 urban water supply systems in mainland China in the medium and long term are given.
Connor Darlington, Jonathan Raikes, Daniel Henstra, Jason Thistlethwaite, and Emma K. Raven
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 699–714, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-699-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-699-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The impacts of climate change on local floods require precise maps that clearly demarcate changes to flood exposure; however, most maps lack important considerations that reduce their utility in policy and decision-making. This article presents a new approach to identifying current and projected flood exposure using a 5 m model. The results highlight advancements in the mapping of flood exposure with implications for flood risk management.
Chiara Arrighi and Alessio Domeneghetti
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 673–679, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-673-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-673-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this communication, we reflect on environmental flood impacts by analysing the reported environmental consequences of the 2023 Emilia-Romagna floods. The most frequently reported damage involves water resources and water-related ecosystems. Indirect effects in time and space, intrinsic recovery capacity, cascade impacts on socio-economic systems, and the lack of established monitoring activities appear to be the most challenging aspects for future research.
Chiara Scaini, Alberto Tamaro, Baurzhan Adilkhan, Satbek Sarzhanov, Zukhritdin Ergashev, Ruslan Umaraliev, Mustafo Safarov, Vladimir Belikov, Japar Karayev, and Ettore Fagà
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 355–373, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-355-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-355-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Central Asia is prone to multiple hazards such as floods, landslides and earthquakes, which can affect a wide range of assets at risk. We develop the first regionally consistent database of assets at risk for non-residential buildings, transportation and croplands in Central Asia. The database combines global and regional data sources and country-based information and supports the development of regional-scale disaster risk reduction strategies for the Central Asia region.
Mersedeh Kooshki Forooshani, Marc van den Homberg, Kyriaki Kalimeri, Andreas Kaltenbrunner, Yelena Mejova, Leonardo Milano, Pauline Ndirangu, Daniela Paolotti, Aklilu Teklesadik, and Monica L. Turner
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 309–329, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-309-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-309-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We improve an existing impact forecasting model for the Philippines by transforming the target variable (percentage of damaged houses) to a fine grid, using only features which are globally available. We show that our two-stage model conserves the performance of the original and even has the potential to introduce savings in anticipatory action resources. Such model generalizability is important in increasing the applicability of such tools around the world.
Lichen Yu, Shining Huang, Hao Qin, Wei Wei, and Lin Mu
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-199, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-199, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for NHESS
Short summary
Short summary
This paper proposes a quantitative storm surge risk assessment method for data-deficient regions. A coupled model is used to simulate five storm surge scenarios. Deep learning is used to extract building footprints. Economic losses are calculated by combining the adjusted depth-damage functions with inundation simulation results. Zonation maps illustrate risk levels based on economic losses, aiding in disaster prevention measures to reduce coastal area losses.
Jia Xu, Makoto Takahashi, and Weifu Li
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 179–197, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-179-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-179-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Through the development of micro-individual social vulnerability indicators and cluster analysis, this study assessed the level of social vulnerability of 599 residents from 11 communities in the Hongshan District of Wuhan. The findings reveal three levels of social vulnerability: high, medium, and low. Quantitative assessments offer specific comparisons between distinct units, and the results indicate that different types of communities have significant differences in social vulnerability.
Tommaso Piseddu, Mathilda Englund, and Karina Barquet
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 145–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-145-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-145-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Contributions to social capital, risk awareness, and preparedness constitute the parameters to test applications in disaster risk management. We propose an evaluation of four of these: mobile positioning data, social media crowdsourcing, drones, and satellite imaging. The analysis grants the opportunity to investigate how different methods to evaluate surveys' results may influence final preferences. We find that the different assumptions on which these methods rely deliver diverging results.
Yuting Zhang, Kai Liu, Xiaoyong Ni, Ming Wang, Jianchun Zheng, Mengting Liu, and Dapeng Yu
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 63–77, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-63-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-63-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This article is aimed at developing a method to quantify the influence of inclement weather on the accessibility of emergency medical services (EMSs) in Beijing, China, and identifying the vulnerable areas that could not get timely EMSs under inclement weather. We found that inclement weather could reduce the accessibility of EMSs by up to 40%. Furthermore, towns with lower baseline EMSs accessibility are more vulnerable when inclement weather occurs.
Emilio Berny, Carlos Avelar, Mario A. Salgado-Gálvez, and Mario Ordaz
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 53–62, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-53-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-53-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a methodology to estimate the total emergency costs based on modelled damages for earthquakes and floods, together with the demographic and building characteristics of the study area. The methodology has been applied in five countries in central Asia, the first time that these estimates are made available for the study area and are intended to be useful for regional and local stakeholders and decision makers.
Henrique M. D. Goulart, Irene Benito Lazaro, Linda van Garderen, Karin van der Wiel, Dewi Le Bars, Elco Koks, and Bart van den Hurk
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 29–45, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-29-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-29-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We explore how Hurricane Sandy (2012) could flood New York City under different scenarios, including climate change and internal variability. We find that sea level rise can quadruple coastal flood volumes, while changes in Sandy's landfall location can double flood volumes. Our results show the need for diverse scenarios that include climate change and internal variability and for integrating climate information into a modelling framework, offering insights for high-impact event assessments.
Hannes Lauer, Carmeli Marie C. Chaves, Evelyn Lorenzo, Sonia Islam, and Jörn Birkmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-50, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-50, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In many urban areas, people face high exposure to hazards. Resettling them to safer locations becomes a major strategy, not least because of climate change. This paper dives into the success factors of government-led resettlement in Manila and finds surprising results, which challenge the usual narrative and fuel the conversation on resettlement as an adaptation strategy. Other as expected, the location – whether urban or rural – of the new home is less important as the safety from floods.
Francesco Caleca, Chiara Scaini, William Frodella, and Veronica Tofani
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 13–27, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-13-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-13-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Landslide risk analysis is a powerful tool because it allows us to identify where physical and economic losses could occur due to a landslide event. The purpose of our work was to provide the first regional-scale analysis of landslide risk for central Asia, and it represents an advanced step in the field of risk analysis for very large areas. Our findings show, per square kilometer, a total risk of about USD 3.9 billion and a mean risk of USD 0.6 million.
Marta Sapena, Moritz Gamperl, Marlene Kühnl, Carolina Garcia-Londoño, John Singer, and Hannes Taubenböck
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3913–3930, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3913-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3913-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A new approach for the deployment of landslide early warning systems (LEWSs) is proposed. We combine data-driven landslide susceptibility mapping and population maps to identify exposed locations. We estimate the cost of monitoring sensors and demonstrate that LEWSs could be installed with a budget ranging from EUR 5 to EUR 41 per person in Medellín, Colombia. We provide recommendations for stakeholders and outline the challenges and opportunities for successful LEWS implementation.
Dong Qiu, Binglin Lv, Yuepeng Cui, and Zexiong Zhan
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3789–3803, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3789-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3789-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper divides preparedness behavior into minimal and adequate preparedness. In addition to studying the main factors that promote families' disaster preparedness, we also study the moderating effects of response efficacy and self-efficacy on preparedness actions by vulnerable families. Based on the findings of this study, policymakers can target interventions and programs that can be designed to remedy the current lack of disaster preparedness education for vulnerable families.
Jenni Barclay, Richie Robertson, and M. Teresa Armijos
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3603–3615, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3603-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3603-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Stories create avenues for sharing the meanings and social implications of scientific knowledge. We explore their value when told between scientists during a volcanic eruption. They are important vehicles for understanding how risk is generated during volcanic eruptions and create new knowledge about these interactions. Stories explore how risk is negotiated when scientific information is ambiguous or uncertain, identify cause and effect, and rationalize the emotional intensity of a crisis.
Isabelle Ousset, Guillaume Evin, Damien Raynaud, and Thierry Faug
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3509–3523, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3509-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3509-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper deals with an exceptional snow and rain event in a Mediterranean region of France which is usually not prone to heavy snowfall and its consequences on a particular building that collapsed completely. Independent analyses of the meteorological episode are carried out, and the response of the building to different snow and rain loads is confronted to identify the main critical factors that led to the collapse.
Leandro Iannacone, Kenneth Otárola, Roberto Gentile, and Carmine Galasso
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2540, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2540, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The paper presents a review of the available classifications for hazard interactions in a multi-hazard context, and it incorporates such classifications from a modeling perspective. The outcome is a sequential Monte Carlo approach enabling efficient simulation of multi-hazard event sets (i.e., sequences of events throughout the life cycle). These event sets can then be integrated into frameworks for the quantification of consequences for the purposes of Life Cycle Consequence (LCCon) Analysis.
Jiachang Tu, Jiahong Wen, Liang Emlyn Yang, Andrea Reimuth, Stephen S. Young, Min Zhang, Luyang Wang, and Matthias Garschagen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3247–3260, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3247-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3247-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper evaluates the flood risk and the resulting patterns in buildings following low-probability, high-impact flood scenarios by a risk analysis chain in Shanghai. The results provide a benchmark and also a clear future for buildings with respect to flood risks in Shanghai. This study links directly to disaster risk management, e.g., the Shanghai Master Plan. We also discussed different potential adaptation options for flood risk management.
Javier Revilla Diez, Roxana Leitold, Van Tran, and Matthias Garschagen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2185, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2185, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Micro-businesses, often overlooked in adaptation research, show surprising willingness to contribute to collective adaptation despite limited finances and local support. Based on a study in Ho-Chi-Minh City in Vietnam, approximately 70 % are ready for awareness campaigns, and 39 % would provide financial support if costs were shared. These findings underscore the need for increased involvement of micro-businesses in local adaptation plans to enhance collective adaptive capacity.
Ignace Pelckmans, Jean-Philippe Belliard, Luis E. Dominguez-Granda, Cornelis Slobbe, Stijn Temmerman, and Olivier Gourgue
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3169–3183, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3169-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3169-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Mangroves are increasingly recognized as a coastal protection against extreme sea levels. Their effectiveness in doing so, however, is still poorly understood, as mangroves are typically located in tropical countries where data on mangrove vegetation and topography properties are often scarce. Through a modelling study, we identified the degree of channelization and the mangrove forest floor topography as the key properties for regulating high water levels in a tropical delta.
André Felipe Rocha Silva and Julian Cardoso Eleutério
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3095–3110, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3095-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3095-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work evaluates the application of flood consequence models through their application in a real case related to a tailings dam failure. Furthermore, we simulated the implementation of less efficient alert systems on life-loss alleviation. The results revealed that the models represented the event well and were able to estimate the relevance of implementing efficient alert systems. They highlight that their use may be an important tool for new regulations for dam safety legislation.
Marina Batalini de Macedo, Marcos Roberto Benso, Karina Simone Sass, Adelaide Cassia Nardocci, Eduardo Mario Mendiondo, Greicelene Jesus da Silva, Pedro Gustavo Câmara da Silva, Abdullah Konak, Nazmiye Balta-Ozkan, and Michael Jacobson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2042, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2042, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
With climate change, societies increasingly need to adapt to deal with more severe droughts and the impacts they can have on food production. To make better adaptation decisions, drought resilience indicators can be used. To build these indicators, surveys with experts can be done. However, designing surveys is a costly process that can influence how experts respond. In this communication, we aim to deal with the challenges encountered in the development of the surveys, to help further research.
Stephen B. Ferencz, Ning Sun, Sean Turner, Brian A. Smith, and Jennie S. Rice
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-149, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-149, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for NHESS
Short summary
Short summary
Drought has long posed an existential threat to society. Population growth and economic development, and the potential for more extreme and prolonged droughts due to climate change pose significant water security challenges. Better understanding the impacts and adaptive responses resulting from extreme drought can aid adaptive planning. The 2008 – 2015 record drought in the Colorado Basin, Texas, United States is used as a case study to assess impacts and responses to severe drought.
Max Schneider, Fabrice Cotton, and Pia-Johanna Schweizer
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2505–2521, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2505-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2505-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Hazard maps are fundamental to earthquake risk reduction, but research is missing on how to design them. We review the visualization literature to identify evidence-based criteria for color and classification schemes for hazard maps. We implement these for the German seismic hazard map, focusing on communicating four properties of seismic hazard. Our evaluation finds that the redesigned map successfully communicates seismic hazard in Germany, improving on the baseline map for two key properties.
Leon Scheiber, Christoph Gabriel David, Mazen Hoballah Jalloul, Jan Visscher, Hong Quan Nguyen, Roxana Leitold, Javier Revilla Diez, and Torsten Schlurmann
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2333–2347, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2333-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2333-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Like many other megacities in low-elevation coastal zones, Ho Chi Minh City in southern Vietnam suffers from the convoluting impact of changing environmental stressors and rapid urbanization. This study assesses quantitative hydro-numerical results against the background of the low-regret paradigm for (1) a large-scale flood protection scheme as currently constructed and (2) the widespread implementation of small-scale rainwater detention as envisioned in the Chinese Sponge City Program.
Dirk Eilander, Anaïs Couasnon, Frederiek C. Sperna Weiland, Willem Ligtvoet, Arno Bouwman, Hessel C. Winsemius, and Philip J. Ward
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2251–2272, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2251-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2251-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a framework for assessing compound flood risk using hydrodynamic, impact, and statistical modeling. A pilot in Mozambique shows the importance of accounting for compound events in risk assessments. We also show how the framework can be used to assess the effectiveness of different risk reduction measures. As the framework is based on global datasets and is largely automated, it can easily be applied in other areas for first-order assessments of compound flood risk.
Juan Camilo Gómez Zapata, Massimiliano Pittore, Nils Brinckmann, Juan Lizarazo-Marriaga, Sergio Medina, Nicola Tarque, and Fabrice Cotton
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2203–2228, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2203-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2203-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To investigate cumulative damage on extended building portfolios, we propose an alternative and modular method to probabilistically integrate sets of single-hazard vulnerability models that are being constantly developed by experts from various research fields to be used within a multi-risk context. We demonstrate its application by assessing the economic losses expected for the residential building stock of Lima, Peru, a megacity commonly exposed to consecutive earthquake and tsunami scenarios.
Oya Kalaycıoğlu, Serhat Emre Akhanlı, Emin Yahya Menteşe, Mehmet Kalaycıoğlu, and Sibel Kalaycıoğlu
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2133–2156, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2133-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2133-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The associations between household characteristics and hazard-related social vulnerability in Istanbul, Türkiye, were assessed using machine learning techniques. The results indicated that less educated households with no social security and job insecurity that live in squatter houses are at a higher risk of social vulnerability. We present the findings in an open-access R Shiny web application, which can serve as a guidance for identifying the target groups in the interest of risk mitigation.
Gregor Ortner, Michael Bründl, Chahan M. Kropf, Thomas Röösli, Yves Bühler, and David N. Bresch
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2089–2110, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2089-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2089-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a new approach to assess avalanche risk on a large scale in mountainous regions. It combines a large-scale avalanche modeling method with a state-of-the-art probabilistic risk tool. Over 40 000 individual avalanches were simulated, and a building dataset with over 13 000 single buildings was investigated. With this new method, risk hotspots can be identified and surveyed. This enables current and future risk analysis to assist decision makers in risk reduction and adaptation.
Harkunti Pertiwi Rahayu, Khonsa Indana Zulfa, Dewi Nurhasanah, Richard Haigh, Dilanthi Amaratunga, and In In Wahdiny
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-85, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-85, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for NHESS
Short summary
Short summary
Transboundary river management for inter-city or inter province become very critical issue due to the ego sectoral and lack of responsibility sharing. This paper has recognized the most strategic flood risk driver from key stakeholder perspective.
Prateek Arora and Luis Ceferino
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1665–1683, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1665-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1665-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Power outage models can help utilities manage risks for outages from hurricanes. Our article reviews the existing outage models during hurricanes and highlights their strengths and limitations. Existing models can give erroneous estimates with outage predictions larger than the number of customers, can struggle with predictions for catastrophic hurricanes, and do not adequately represent infrastructure failure's uncertainties. We suggest models for the future that can overcome these challenges.
Huige Xing, Ting Que, Yuxin Wu, Shiyu Hu, Haibo Li, Hongyang Li, Martin Skitmore, and Nima Talebian
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1529–1547, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1529-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1529-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Disaster risk reduction requires public power. The aim of this study is to investigate the factors influencing the public's intention to participate in disaster risk reduction. An empirical study was conducted using structural equation modeling data analysis methods. The findings show that public attitudes, perceptions of those around them, ability to participate, and sense of participation are important factors.
Di Wang, Ming Wang, Kai Liu, and Jun Xie
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1409–1423, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1409-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1409-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The short–medium-term intervention effect on the post-earthquake area was analysed by simulations in different scenarios. The sediment transport patterns varied in different sub-regions, and the relative effectiveness in different scenarios changed over time with a general downward trend, where the steady stage implicated the scenario with more facilities performing better in controlling sediment output. Therefore, the simulation methods could support optimal rehabilitation strategies.
Marcos Roberto Benso, Gabriela Chiquito Gesualdo, Roberto Fray Silva, Greicelene Jesus Silva, Luis Miguel Castillo Rápalo, Fabricio Alonso Richmond Navarro, Patricia Angélica Alves Marques, José Antônio Marengo, and Eduardo Mario Mendiondo
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1335–1354, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1335-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1335-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This article is about how farmers can better protect themselves from disasters like droughts, extreme temperatures, and floods. The authors suggest that one way to do this is by offering insurance contracts that cover these different types of disasters. By having this insurance, farmers can receive financial support and recover more quickly. The article elicits different ideas about how to design this type of insurance and suggests ways to make it better.
Shivani Chouhan and Mahua Mukherjee
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1267–1286, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1267-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1267-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Himalayas are prone to multi-hazards. To minimise loss, proper planning and execution are necessary. Data collection is the basis of any risk assessment process. This enhanced survey form is easy to understand and pictorial and identifies high-risk components of any building (structural and non-structural) surrounded by multi-hazards. Its results can help to utilise the budget in a prioritised way. A SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities) analysis has been performed.
Thulasi Vishwanath Harish, Nivedita Sairam, Liang Emlyn Yang, Matthias Garschagen, and Heidi Kreibich
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1125–1138, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1125-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1125-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Coastal Asian cities are becoming more vulnerable to flooding. In this study we analyse the data collected from flood-prone houses in Ho Chi Minh City to identify what motivates the households to adopt flood precautionary measures. The results revealed that educating the households about the available flood precautionary measures and communicating the flood protection measures taken by the government encourage the households to adopt measures without having to experience multiple flood events.
Annegret H. Thieken, Philip Bubeck, Anna Heidenreich, Jennifer von Keyserlingk, Lisa Dillenardt, and Antje Otto
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 973–990, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-973-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-973-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In July 2021 intense rainfall caused devastating floods in western Europe with 184 fatalities in the German federal states of North Rhine-Westphalia (NW) and Rhineland-Palatinate (RP), calling their warning system into question. An online survey revealed that 35 % of respondents from NW and 29 % from RP did not receive any warning. Many of those who were warned did not expect severe flooding, nor did they know how to react. The study provides entry points for improving Germany's warning system.
Blaise Mafuko Nyandwi, Matthieu Kervyn, François Muhashy Habiyaremye, François Kervyn, and Caroline Michellier
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 933–953, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-933-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-933-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Risk perception involves the processes of collecting, selecting and interpreting signals about the uncertain impacts of hazards. It may contribute to improving risk communication and motivating the protective behaviour of the population living near volcanoes. Our work describes the spatial variation and factors influencing volcanic risk perception of 2204 adults of Goma exposed to Nyiragongo. It contributes to providing a case study for risk perception understanding in the Global South.
Fatemeh Jalayer, Hossein Ebrahimian, Konstantinos Trevlopoulos, and Brendon Bradley
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 909–931, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-909-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-909-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Assessing tsunami fragility and the related uncertainties is crucial in the evaluation of incurred losses. Empirical fragility modelling is based on observed tsunami intensity and damage data. Fragility curves for hierarchical damage levels are distinguished by their laminar shape; that is, the curves should not intersect. However, this condition is not satisfied automatically. We present a workflow for hierarchical fragility modelling, uncertainty propagation and fragility model selection.
Carlos Mesta, Gemma Cremen, and Carmine Galasso
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 711–731, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-711-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-711-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Flood risk is expected to increase in many regions worldwide due to rapid urbanization and climate change. The benefits of risk-mitigation measures remain inadequately quantified for potential future events in some multi-hazard-prone areas such as Kathmandu Valley (KV), Nepal, which this paper addresses. The analysis involves modeling two flood occurrence scenarios and using four residential exposure inventories representing current urban system or near-future development trajectories for KV.
Kirk B. Enu, Aude Zingraff-Hamed, Mohammad A. Rahman, Lindsay C. Stringer, and Stephan Pauleit
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 481–505, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-481-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-481-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In sub-Saharan Africa, there is reported uptake of at least one nature-based solution (NBS) in 71 % of urban areas in the region for mitigating hydro-meteorological risks. These NBSs are implemented where risks exist but not where they are most severe. With these NBSs providing multiple ecosystem services and four out of every five NBSs creating livelihood opportunities, NBSs can help address major development challenges in the region, such as water and food insecurity and unemployment.
Madeleine-Sophie Déroche
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 251–259, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-251-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-251-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper proves the need to conduct an in-depth review of the existing loss modelling framework and makes it clear that only a transdisciplinary effort will be up to the challenge of building global loss models. These two factors are essential to capture the interactions and increasing complexity of the three risk drivers (exposure, hazard, and vulnerability), thus enabling insurers to anticipate and be equipped to face the far-ranging impacts of climate change and other natural events.
May Laor and Zohar Gvirtzman
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 139–158, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-139-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-139-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study aims to provide a practical and relatively fast solution for early-stage planning of marine infrastructure that must cross a faulted zone. Instead of investing huge efforts in finding whether each specific fault meets a pre-defined criterion of activeness, we map the subsurface and determine the levels of fault hazard based on the amount of displacement and the fault's plane size. This allows for choosing the least problematic infrastructure routes at an early planning stage.
Ruth Stephan, Stefano Terzi, Mathilde Erfurt, Silvia Cocuccioni, Kerstin Stahl, and Marc Zebisch
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 45–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-45-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-45-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study maps agriculture's vulnerability to drought in the European pre-Alpine regions of Thurgau (CH) and Podravska (SI). We combine region-specific knowledge with quantitative data mapping; experts of the study regions, far apart, identified a few common but more region-specific factors that we integrated in two vulnerability scenarios. We highlight the benefits of the participatory approach in improving the quantitative results and closing the gap between science and practitioners.
Lorenzo Cugliari, Massimo Crescimbene, Federica La Longa, Andrea Cerase, Alessandro Amato, and Loredana Cerbara
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4119–4138, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-4119-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-4119-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Tsunami Alert Centre of the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology (CAT-INGV) has been promoting the study of tsunami risk perception in Italy since 2018. A total of 7342 questionnaires were collected in three survey phases (2018, 2020, 2021). In this work we present the main results of the three survey phases, with a comparison among the eight surveyed regions and between the coastal regions and some coastal metropolitan cities involved in the survey.
Cited articles
Alexander, D. E.: The L'Aquila Earthquake of 6 April 2009 and Italian Government Policy on Disaster Response, Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 2, 325–342, https://doi.org/10.1080/19390459.2010.511450, 2010. a, b
Alexander, D. E.: An evaluation of medium-term recovery processes after the 6 April 2009 earthquake in L'Aquila, Central Italy, Environmental Hazards, 12, 60–73, https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2012.689250, 2013. a
Ali, R. A., Mannakkara, S., and Wilkinson, S.: Factors affecting successful transition between post-disaster recovery phases: a case study of 2010 floods in Sindh, Pakistan, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 11, 597–614, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-03-2020-0016, 2020. a, b
Alifa, S. and Nugroho, F.: The role of local community enterprise towards economic recovery of disaster-affected community in Indonesia, Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 27, 2333–2349, 2019. a
Almoghathawi, Y. and Barker, K.: Component importance measures for interdependent infrastructure network resilience, Comput. Ind. Eng., 133, 153–164, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.05.001, 2019. a
Arenas, A., Missal, R., Mellucci, C., Murshed, Z., and Vatsa, K.: A Guidance Note: National Post-Disaster Recovery Planning and Coordination, https://www.preventionweb.net/publication/guidance-note-national-post-disaster-recovery-planning-and-coordination (last access: 24 October 2023), 2016. a, b, c
Argyroudis, S. A., Mitoulis, S. A., Hofer, L., Zanini, M. A., Tubaldi, E., and Frangopol, D. M.: Resilience assessment framework for critical infrastructure in a multi-hazard environment: Case study on transport assets, Sci. Total Environ., 714, 136854, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136854, 2020. a, b
Aroquipa, H. and Hurtado, A.: Seismic resilience assessment of buildings: A simplified methodological approach through conventional seismic risk assessment, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 77, 103047, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103047, 2022. a
Australian Institute for Disaster Resilience: Australian Emergency Management Thesaurus, Tech. rep., Australian Institute for Disaster Resilience, https://knowledge.aidr.org.au/media/1957/manual-4-australian-emergency-management-thesaurus.pdf (last access: 24 October 2023), 1998. a
Bahmani, H. and Zhang, W.: Comprehensive Success Evaluation Framework for Socio-Natural Disaster Recovery Projects, Buildings, 11, 647, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11120647, 2021. a, b, c, d
Barakat, S. and Zyck, S. A.: Housing Reconstruction as Socio-economic Recovery and State Building: Evidence from Southern Lebanon, Housing Stud., 26, 133–154, https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2010.512750, 2011. a
Berke, P., Cooper, J., Aminto, M., Grabich, S., and Horney, J.: Adaptive Planning for Disaster Recovery and Resiliency: An Evaluation of 87 Local Recovery Plans in Eight States, J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 80, 310–323, https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.976585, 2014. a
Berke, P. R., Song, Y., and Stevens, M.: Integrating Hazard Mitigation into New Urban and Conventional Developments, J. Plan. Educ. Res., 28, 441–455, https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X09331550, 2009. a
Blackburn, S.: What Does Transformation Look Like? Post-Disaster Politics and the Case for Progressive Rehabilitation, Sustainability, 10, 2317, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072317, 2018. a
Blagojević, N., Didier, M., and Stojadinović, B.: Quantifying component importance for disaster resilience of communities with interdependent civil infrastructure systems, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe, 228, 108747, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108747, 2022.
Boaz, A., Ashby, D., and Young, K.: Systematic reviews: what have they got to offer evidence based policy and practice?, ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice London https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/Should-I-do-a-systematic-review.pdf, (last access: 24 October 2023), 2002. a
Bolin, R. and Stanford, L.: The Northridge Earthquake: Community-based Approaches to Unmet Recovery Needs, Disasters, 22, 21–38, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00073, 1998. a
Bolin, R. C. and Bolton, P. A.: Race, religion, and ethnicity in disaster recovery, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/fmhi_pub/88 (last access: 12 January 2024), 1986. a
Bosher, L., Chmutina, K., and van Niekerk, D.: Stop going around in circles: towards a reconceptualisation of disaster risk management phases, Disaster Prev. Manag., 30, 525–537, https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-03-2021-0071, 2021. a
Bozza, A., Asprone, D., and Manfredi, G.: Developing an integrated framework to quantify resilience of urban systems against disasters, Nat. Hazards, 78, 1729–1748, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1798-3, 2015. a
Bozza, A., Asprone, D., and Manfredi, G.: A methodological framework assessing disaster resilience of city ecosystems to enhance resource use efficiency, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 9, 136–150, https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2016.1244538, 2017.
Bristow, D. N.: How Spatial and Functional Dependencies between Operations and Infrastructure Leads to Resilient Recovery, J. Infrastruct. Syst., 25, 04019011, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000490, 2019.
Brugmann, J.: Financing the resilient city, Environ. Urban., 24, 215–232, https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247812437130, 2012. a
Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O'Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W. A., and von Winterfeldt, D.: A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities, Earthq. Spectra, 19, 733–752, https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497, 2003. a, b
Cavallaro, M., Asprone, D., Latora, V., Manfredi, G., and Nicosia, V.: Assessment of Urban Ecosystem Resilience through Hybrid Social–Physical Complex Networks, Comput.-Aided Civ. Inf., 29, 608–625, https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12080, 2014.
Cerè, G., Rezgui, Y., and Zhao, W.: Critical review of existing built environment resilience frameworks: Directions for future research, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 25, 173–189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.018, 2017. a
Cha, E. J. and He, X.: Post-disaster Recovery Planning of Interdependent Infrastructure Systems: A Game Theory-Based Approach, in: 13th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering(ICASP13), Seoul, South Korea, 26–30 May 2019, https://doi.org/10.22725/ICASP13.091, 2019.
Chandrasekhar, D.: Digging deeper: participation and non-participation in post-disaster community recovery, Community Development, 43, 614–629, https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2012.730538, 2012. a, b
Chandrasekhar, D., Zhang, Y., and Xiao, Y.: Nontraditional Participation in Disaster Recovery Planning: Cases From China, India, and the United States, J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 80, 373–384, https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.989399, 2014. a
Chang, S. E.: Modeling how cities recover from disasters, in: International Conference on Urban Disaster Reduction, Kobe, Japan, January 2005, 18–20, 2005. a
Chang, S. E.: Urban disaster recovery: a measurement framework and its application to the 1995 Kobe earthquake, Disasters, 34, 303–327, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01130.x, 2010. a
Charles, S. H., Chang-Richards, A., and Yiu, T. W.: What do post-disaster reconstruction project success indicators look like? End-user’s perspectives, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 13, 31–50, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-11-2020-0112, 2021. a
Charny, J. and Martin, S.: Sri Lanka: Tsunami Survivors Yearn for Permanent Housing and Employment, Refugees International, https://www.refworld.org/docid/47a6eec78.html (last access: 24 October 2023), 2005. a
Chen, K.-T., Chen, W. J., Malilay, J., and Twu, S.-J.: The Public Health Response to the Chi-Chi Earthquake in Taiwan, 1999, Public Health Rep., 118, 493–499, 2016. a
Cheng, S., Ganapati, E., and Ganapati, S.: Measuring disaster recovery: bouncing back or reaching the counterfactual state?, Disasters, 39, 427–446, https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12112, 2015. a
Cheng, Y., Elsayed, E. A., and Chen, X.: Random Multi Hazard Resilience Modeling of Engineered Systems and Critical Infrastructure, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe, 209, 107453, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107453, 2021. a, b
Chhibber, A. and Laajaj, R.: Natural disasters and economic development impact, response and preparedness, Global Development Network, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265198864_Natural_Disasters_and_Economic_Development_Impact_Response_and_Preparedness (last access: 24 October 2023), 2007. a
Clinton, W. J.: Lessons learned from tsunami recovery: Key propositions for building back better, New York: Office of the UN Secretary-General's Special Envoy for Tsunami Recovery, https://www.preventionweb.net/files/2054_VL108301.pdf (last access: 24 October 2023), 2006. a
Coaffee, J.: Risk, resilience, and environmentally sustainable cities, Energ. Policy, 36, 4633–4638, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.048, 2008. a
Coetzee, C. and Van, N. D.: Tracking the evolution of the disaster management cycle: a general system theory approach: original research, Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 4, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v4i1.54, 2012. a
Comerio, M. C.: Disaster Recovery and Community Renewal: Housing Approaches, Cityscape, 16, 51–68, 2014. a
Contreras, D.: Fuzzy Boundaries Between Post-Disaster Phases: The Case of L'Aquila, Italy, Int. J. Disast. Risk Sc., 7, 277–292, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-016-0095-4, 2016. a
Contreras, D., Blaschke, T., Kienberger, S., and Zeil, P.: Spatial connectivity as a recovery process indicator: The L'Aquila earthquake, Technol. Forecast. Soc., 80, 1782–1803, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.001, 2013. a, b
Contreras, D., Blaschke, T., Kienberger, S., and Zeil, P.: Myths and realities about the recovery of L'Aquila after the earthquake, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 8, 125–142, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.02.001, 2014. a, b
Contreras, D., Blaschke, T., and Hodgson, M. E.: Lack of spatial resilience in a recovery process: Case L'Aquila, Italy, Technol. Forecast. Soc., 121, 76–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.010, 2017. a
CRED: 2021 Disasters in numbers, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disaster (CRED), https://reliefweb.int/report/world/2021-disasters-numbers (last access: 5 March 2023), 2022. a
Crosti, C., Duthinh, D., and Simiu, E.: Risk Consistency and Synergy in Multihazard Design, J. Struct. Eng., 137, 844–849, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000335, 2011. a
Curt, C.: Multirisk: What trends in recent works? – A bibliometric analysis, Sci. Total Environ., 763, 142951, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142951, 2021. a
Cutter, S. L., Emrich, C. T., Mitchell, J. T., Boruff, B. J., Gall, M., Schmidtlein, M. C., Burton, C. G., and Melton, G.: The Long Road Home: Race, Class, and Recovery from Hurricane Katrina, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 48, 8–20, https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.48.2.8-20, 2006. a
Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., and Webb, J.: A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters, Global Environ. Chang., 18, 598–606, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013, 2008. a
da Silva, J., Kernaghan, S., and Luque, A.: A systems approach to meeting the challenges of urban climate change, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 4, 125–145, https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2012.718279, 2012. a
Daly, P., Barenstein, J. D., Hollenbach, P., and Ninglekhu, S.: Post-disaster housing reconstruction in urban areas in Nepal, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London, https://www.iied.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/migrate/10836IIED.pdf (last access: 24 October 2023), 2017. a, b
David R., G., Adam, R., Elliott, M., Keith, P., and Carol, T. W.: Estimating the value of foresight: aggregate analysis of natural hazard mitigation benefits and costs, J. Environ. Plann. Man., 52, 739–756, https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560903083715, 2009. a
Davidson, C. H., Johnson, C., Lizarralde, G., Dikmen, N., and Sliwinski, A.: Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects, Habitat Int., 31, 100–115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2006.08.003, 2007. a
Davis, I.: Learning from Disaster Recovery: Guidance for Decision Makers: Executive Summary, International Recovery Platform, https://www.undrr.org/publication/learning-disaster-recovery-guidance-decision-makers-executive-summary (last access: 24 October 2023), 2007. a, b
Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., Fünfgeld, H., McEvoy, D., Porter, L., and Davoudi, S.: Resilience: A Bridging Concept or a Dead End? “Reframing” Resilience: Challenges for Planning Theory and Practice Interacting Traps: Resilience Assessment of a Pasture Management System in Northern Afghanistan Urban Resilience: What Does it Mean in Planning Practice? Resilience as a Useful Concept for Climate Change Adaptation? The Politics of Resilience for Planning: A Cautionary Note, Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 299–333, https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677124, 2012. a
De Angeli, S., Malamud, B. D., Rossi, L., Taylor, F. E., Trasforini, E., and Rudari, R.: A multi-hazard framework for spatial-temporal impact analysis, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 73, 102829, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102829, 2022. a, b, c, d
de Ruiter, M. C., Couasnon, A., van den Homberg, M. J. C., Daniell, J. E., Gill, J. C., and Ward, P. J.: Why We Can No Longer Ignore Consecutive Disasters, Earth's Future, 8, e2019EF001425, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001425, 2020. a, b, c
de Ruiter, M. C., de Bruijn, J. A., Englhardt, J., Daniell, J. E., de Moel, H., and Ward, P. J.: The Asynergies of Structural Disaster Risk Reduction Measures: Comparing Floods and Earthquakes, Earth's Future, 9, e2020EF001531, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001531, 2021. a
Deen, S.: Pakistan 2010 floods. Policy gaps in disaster preparedness and response, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 12, 341–349, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.03.007, 2015. a
Degg, M. R. and Chester, D. K.: Seismic and volcanic hazards in Peru: changing attitudes to disaster mitigation, Geogr. J., 171, 125–145, 2005. a
Delilah Roque, A., Pijawka, D., and Wutich, A.: The Role of Social Capital in Resiliency: Disaster Recovery in Puerto Rico, Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 11, 204–235, https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12187, 2020. a, b
Der Sarkissian, R., Abdallah, C., Zaninetti, J.-M., and Najem, S.: Modelling intra-dependencies to assess road network resilience to natural hazards, Nat. Hazards, 103, 121–137, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03962-5, 2020. a, b
Der Sarkissian, R., Dabaj, A., Diab, Y., and Vuillet, M.: Evaluating the Implementation of the “Build-Back-Better” Concept for Critical Infrastructure Systems: Lessons from Saint-Martin’s Island Following Hurricane Irma, Sustainability, 13, 3133, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063133, 2021. a
Der Sarkissian, R., Cariolet, J.-M., Diab, Y., and Vuillet, M.: Investigating the importance of critical infrastructures' interdependencies during recovery; lessons from Hurricane Irma in Saint-Martin's island, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 67, 102675, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102675, 2022. a
Desouza, K. C. and Flanery, T. H.: Designing, planning, and managing resilient cities: A conceptual framework, Cities, 35, 89–99, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003, 2013. a
Dong, S., Malecha, M., Farahmand, H., Mostafavi, A., Berke, P. R., and Woodruff, S. C.: Integrated infrastructure-plan analysis for resilience enhancement of post-hazards access to critical facilities, Cities, 117, 103318, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103318, 2021. a
Du, L. and Peeta, S.: A Stochastic Optimization Model to Reduce Expected Post-Disaster Response Time Through Pre-Disaster Investment Decisions, Networks and Spatial Economics, 14, 271–295, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-013-9219-1, 2014.
Dudenhoeffer, D. D., Permann, M. R., and Manic, M.: CIMS: A Framework for Infrastructure Interdependency Modeling and Analysis, in: Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, 478–485, 3–6 December 2006, Monterey, CA, USA, https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2006.323119, 2006. a
Dunford, M. and Li, L.: Earthquake reconstruction in Wenchuan: Assessing the state overall plan and addressing the “forgotten phase”, Appl. Geogr., 31, 998–1009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.01.001, 2011. a, b, c
Durham, K.: Treating the risks in Cairns, Nat. Hazards, 30, 251–261, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026174602731, 2003. a
Dwyer, C. and Horney, J.: Validating Indicators of Disaster Recovery with Qualitative Research, PLoS Currents, 6, ecurrents.dis.ec60 859ff436 919e096d51ef7d50 736f, https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.ec60859ff436919e096d51ef7d50736f, 2014. a
Esteban, M., Onuki, M., Ikeda, I., and Akiyama, T.: Chapter 29 – Reconstruction Following the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami: Case Study of Otsuchi Town in Iwate Prefecture, Japan, in: Handbook of Coastal Disaster Mitigation for Engineers and Planners, edited by: Esteban, M., Takagi, H., and Shibayama, T., 615–631, Butterworth-Heinemann, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801060-0.00029-0, 2015. a
Fang, Y. and Zio, E.: Game-Theoretic Decision Making for the Resilience of Interdependent Infrastructures Exposed to Disruptions, in: Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience: Theories, Methods, Tools and Technologies, edited by: Gritzalis, D., Theocharidou, M., and Stergiopoulos, G., Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications, 97–114, Springer International Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00024-0_6, 2019a.
Fang, Y.-P. and Zio, E.: An adaptive robust framework for the optimization of the resilience of interdependent infrastructures under natural hazards, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 276, 1119–1136, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.052, 2019b.
Fang, Y.-P., Pedroni, N., and Zio, E.: Resilience-Based Component Importance Measures for Critical Infrastructure Network Systems, IEEE T. Reliab., 65, 502–512, https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2016.2521761, 2016. a
Fernandez, G. and Ahmed, I.: “Build back better” approach to disaster recovery: Research trends since 2006, Progress in Disaster Science, 1, 100003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100003, 2019. a, b, c
Folke, C.: Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses, Global Environ. Chang., 16, 253–267, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002, 2006. a
Forino, G.: Disaster recovery: narrating the resilience process in the reconstruction of L’Aquila (Italy), Geogr. TIDSSKR, 115, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2014.973056, 2015. a
Freeman, P. K.: Allocation of post-disaster reconstruction financing to housing, Build. Res. Inf., 32, 427–437, https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321042000221016, 2004. a
Fussell, E.: The Long-Term Recovery of New Orleans’ Population After Hurricane Katrina, Am. Behav. Sci., 59, 1231–1245, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215591181, 2015. a
Gaillard, J.-C. and Mercer, J.: From knowledge to action: Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction, Prog. Hum. Geog., 37, 93–114, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512446717, 2013. a
Ganapati, N. E. and Mukherji, A.: Out of Sync: World Bank Funding for Housing Recovery, Postdisaster Planning, and Participation, Nat. Hazards Rev., 15, 58–73, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000120, 2014. a
Garnett, J. D. and Moore, M.: Enhancing Disaster Recovery: Lessons from Exemplary International Disaster Management Practices, J. Homel. Secur. Emerg., 7, 40, https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1711, 2010. a
Cremen, G., Galasso, C., McCloskey, J., Barcena, A., Creed, M., Filippi, M. E., Gentile, R., Jenkins, L. T., Kalaycioglu, M., Mentese, E. Y., Muthusamy, M., Tarbali, K., and Trogrlić, R. Š.: A state-of-the-art decision-support environment for risk-sensitive and pro-poor urban planning and design in Tomorrow's cities, Int. J. Disast., 85, 103400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103400, 2023 a
Gentile, R., Galasso, C., Idris, Y., Rusydy, I., and Meilianda, E.: From rapid visual survey to multi-hazard risk prioritisation and numerical fragility of school buildings, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1365–1386, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1365-2019, 2019. a, b
GFDRR: Post-Disaster Needs Assessments, Volume A. Guidelines, European Commission, United Nations Development Group, and Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, https://www.gfdrr.org/en/publication/post-disaster-needs-assessments-guidelines-volume-2013 (last access: 24 October 2023), 2013. a, b
Ghannad, P., Lee, Y.-C., Friedland, C. J., Choi, J. O., and Yang, E.: Multiobjective Optimization of Postdisaster Reconstruction Processes for Ensuring Long-Term Socioeconomic Benefits, J. Manage. Eng., 36, 04020038, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000799, 2020. a
Ghorbani-Renani, N., González, A. D., Barker, K., and Morshedlou, N.: Protection-interdiction-restoration: Tri-level optimization for enhancing interdependent network resilience, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe, 199, 106907, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106907, 2020. a
Gill, J. C. and Malamud, B. D.: Reviewing and visualizing the interactions of natural hazards, Rev. Geophys., 52, 680–722, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000445, 2014. a
Gill, J. C. and Malamud, B. D.: Hazard interactions and interaction networks (cascades) within multi-hazard methodologies, Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 659–679, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-659-2016, 2016. a
Goldschmidt, K. H. and Kumar, S.: Reducing the cost of humanitarian operations through disaster preparation and preparedness, Ann. Oper. Res., 283, 1139–1152, 2019. a
Grant, M. J. and Booth, A.: A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies, Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x, 2009. a
Guidotti, R., Gardoni, P., and Rosenheim, N.: Integration of physical infrastructure and social systems in communities’ reliability and resilience analysis, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe, 185, 476–492, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.01.008, 2019.
Haas, J., Kates, R., Bowden, M., and Amaral, D.: Reconstruction Following Disaster, Environmental Studies Series, MIT Press, ISBN 9780262080941, 1977. a
He, L.: We need land first: Identifying local needs for sustainable recovery after the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal, WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-62, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki, Finland, https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2018/504-6, 2018. a
He, L.: Identifying local needs for post-disaster recovery in Nepal, World Dev., 118, 52–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.02.005, 2019. a, b
He, L., Aitchison, J. C., Hussey, K., Wei, Y., and Lo, A.: Accumulation of vulnerabilities in the aftermath of the 2015 Nepal earthquake: Household displacement, livelihood changes and recovery challenges, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 31, 68–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.017, 2018. a
He, L., Aitchison, J. C., Hussey, K., and Chen, Y.: Building new houses or long-term recovery? A combination of quantitative and qualitative evidence from earthquake-displaced households in Sichuan, China, Habitat Int., 83, 135–145, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.12.002, 2019. a, b
He, X. and Cha, E. J.: DIN II: incorporation of multi-level interdependencies and uncertainties for infrastructure system recovery modeling, Struct. Infrastruct. E., 17, 1566–1581, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1817104, 2021. a
Heo, B.-Y. and Heo, W.-H.: Economic Analysis of Disaster Management Investment Effectiveness in Korea, Sustainability, 11, 3011, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113011, 2019. a
Hinzpeter, K. and Sandholz, S.: Squaring the circle? Integrating environment, infrastructure and risk reduction in Post Disaster Needs Assessments, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 32, 113–124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.016, 2018. a, b
Hochrainer-Stigler, S., Šakić Trogrlić, R., Reiter, K., Ward, P. J., de Ruiter, M. C., Duncan, M. J., Torresan, S., Ciurean, R., Mysiak, J., Stuparu, D., and Gottardo, S.: Toward a framework for systemic multi-hazard and multi-risk assessment and management, iScience, 26, 106736, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106736, 2023. a, b
Holling, C. S.: Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245, 1973. a
Gunderson, L. H. and Holling, C. S.: Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems, Island Press, Washington, DC, 507 pp., ISBN 1559638575, 2002. a
Holton, G. E. L.: Disasters and Democracy: The Politics of Extreme Natural Events, Electronic Green Journal, 1, 13, https://doi.org/10.5070/G311310409, 2000. a
Honjo, Y.: Implementation of the Kobe City Recovery Plan, Japan Social Innovation Journal, 1, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.12668/jsij.1.1, 2011. a
Horney, J., Nguyen, M., Salvesen, D., Tomasco, O., and Berke, P.: Engaging the public in planning for disaster recovery, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 17, 33–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.011, 2016. a
Ingram, J. C., Franco, G., Rumbaitis-del Rio, C., and Khazai, B.: Post-disaster recovery dilemmas: challenges in balancing short-term and long-term needs for vulnerability reduction, Environ. Sci. Policy, 9, 607–613, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.07.006, 2006. a, b
Ismail, D., Majid, T. A., Roosli, R., and Ab Samah, N.: Project management success for post-disaster reconstruction projects: International NGOs perspectives, Proc. Econ. Financ., 18, 120–127, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00921-6, 2014. a
Iuchi, K.: Planning resettlement after disasters, J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 80, 413–425, https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.978353, 2014. a
Iuchi, K., Maly, E., and Johnson, L.: Three Years After a Mega-disaster: Recovery Policies, Programs and Implementation After the Great East Japan Earthquake, in: Post-Tsunami Hazard: Reconstruction and Restoration, edited by: Santiago-Fandiño, V., Kontar, Y., and Kaneda, Y., Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, 29–46, Springer International Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10202-3_3, 2015. a
Jenkins, L. T., Creed, M. J., Tarbali, K., Muthusamy, M., Šakić Trogrlić, R., Phillips, J. C., Watson, C. S., Sinclair, H. D., Galasso, C., and McCloskey, J.: Physics-based simulations of multiple natural hazards for risk-sensitive planning and decision making in expanding urban regions, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 84, 103338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103338, 2023. a
Kates, R. W. and Pijawka, D.: From rubble to monument: the pace of reconstruction, in: Reconstruction Following Disaster, edited by: Haas, J., Kates, R., Bowden, M., and Amaral, D., 1–23, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1977. a
Kates, R. W., Colten, C. E., Laska, S., and Leatherman, S. P.: Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: A research perspective, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 14653–14660, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605726103, 2006. a
Kawasaki, A. and Rhyner, J.: Investing in Disaster Risk Reduction for Resilience: Roles of Science, Technology, and Education, Journal of Disaster Research, 13, 1181–1186, https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2018.p1181, 2018. a
Kennedy, J., Ashmore, J., Babister, E., and Kelman, I.: The Meaning of “Build Back Better”: Evidence From Post-Tsunami Aceh and Sri Lanka, J. Conting. Crisis Man., 16, 24–36, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2008.00529.x, 2008. a, b, c
Kim, K. and Olshansky, R. B.: The Theory and Practice of Building Back Better, J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 80, 289–292, https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.988597, 2014. a
Klein, R. J., Nicholls, R. J., and Thomalla, F.: Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept?, Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 5, 35–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazards.2004.02.001, 2003. a
Kousky, C., Ritchie, L., Tierney, K., and Lingle, B.: Return on investment analysis and its applicability to community disaster preparedness activities: Calculating costs and returns, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re, 41, 101296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101296, 2019. a
Kurosaki, T.: Household-Level Recovery after Floods in a Tribal and Conflict-Ridden Society, World Dev., 94, 51–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.039, 2017. a, b
Labadie, J. R.: Auditing of post‐disaster recovery and reconstruction activities, Disaster Prev. Manag., 17, 575–586, https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560810918612, 2008. a
Leichenko, R.: Climate change and urban resilience, Curr. Opin. Env. Sust., 3, 164–168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014, 2011. a
Levine, J. N., Esnard, A.-M., and Sapat, A.: Population Displacement and Housing Dilemmas Due to Catastrophic Disasters, J. Plan. Lit., 22, 3–15, https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412207302277, 2007. a
Li, Y., Ahuja, A., and Padgett, J. E.: Review of Methods to Assess, Design for, and Mitigate Multiple Hazards, J. Perform. Constr. Fac., 26, 104–117, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000279, 2012. a
Liu, N., Zhang, J., Lin, W., Cheng, W., and Chen, Z.: Draining Tangjiashan Barrier Lake after Wenchuan Earthquake and the flood propagation after the dam break, Sci. China Ser. E, 52, 801–809, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-0118-0, 2009. a
Liu, W., Song, Z., Ouyang, M., and Li, J.: Recovery-based seismic resilience enhancement strategies of water distribution networks, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 203, 107088, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107088, 2020.
Liu, X., Ferrario, E., and Zio, E.: Resilience Analysis Framework for Interconnected Critical Infrastructures, ASCE-ASME J. Risk and Uncert. in Engrg. Sys. Part B Mech. Engrg., 3, RISK-15-1115, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035728, 2017. a
Liu, X., Fang, Y.-P., and Zio, E.: A Hierarchical Resilience Enhancement Framework for Interdependent Critical Infrastructures, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 215, 107868, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107868, 2021.
Lyons, M.: Building Back Better: The Large-Scale Impact of Small-Scale Approaches to Reconstruction, World Dev., 37, 385–398, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.01.006, 2009. a
MacRae, G. and Hodgkin, D.: Beyond the 2006 Yogyakarta Earthquake, in: Rebuilding Asia Following Natural Disasters: Approaches to Reconstruction in the Asia-Pacific Region, 261–283, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139683548.011, 2016. a
Malilay, J., Flanders, W. D., and Brogan, D.: A modified cluster-sampling method for post-disaster rapid assessment of needs., B. World Health Organ., 74, 399–405, 1996. a
Mannella, A., Di Ludovico, M., Sabino, A., Prota, A., Dolce, M., and Manfredi, G.: Analysis of the Population Assistance and Returning Home in the Reconstruction Process of the 2009 L’Aquila Earthquake, Sustainability, 9, 1395, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081395, 2017. a
Manyena, B., Machingura, F., and O'Keefe, P.: Disaster Resilience Integrated Framework for Transformation (DRIFT): A new approach to theorising and operationalising resilience, World Dev., 123, 104587, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.011, 2019. a
Marshall, M. I. and Schrank, H. L.: Small business disaster recovery: a research framework, Nat. Hazards, 72, 597–616, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-1025-z, 2014. a
Marzocchi, W., Di Ruocco, A., and Mastellone, M. L.: Principles of multi-risk assessment: interaction amongst natural and man-induced risks, European Commission, ISBN 978-92-79-07963-4, 2009. a
Marzocchi, W., Garcia-Aristizabal, A., Gasparini, P., Mastellone, M. L., and Di Ruocco, A.: Basic principles of multi-risk assessment: a case study in Italy, Nat. Hazards, 62, 551–573, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0092-x, 2012. a
Masiero, G. and Santarossa, M.: Natural disasters and electoral outcomes, Eur. J. Polit. Econ., 67, 101983, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101983, 2021. a
McEntire, D. A., Fuller, C., Johnston, C. W., and Weber, R.: A Comparison of Disaster Paradigms: The Search for a Holistic Policy Guide, Public Admin. Rev., 62, 267–281, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00178, 2002. a, b
Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., and Stults, M.: Defining urban resilience: A review, Landscape Urban Plan., 147, 38–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011, 2016. a, b
Mileti, D.: Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Nat. Hazards in the United States, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, ISBN 978-0-309-26173-9, https://doi.org/10.17226/5782, 1999. a, b
Miri, M., Raziei, T., Zand, M., and Kousari, M. R.: Synoptic aspects of two flash flood-inducing heavy rainfalls in southern Iran during 2019–2020, Nat. Hazards, 115, 2655–2672, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05658-4, 2023. a
Mitsova, D., Escaleras, M., Sapat, A., Esnard, A.-M., and Lamadrid, A. J.: The Effects of Infrastructure Service Disruptions and Socio-Economic Vulnerability on Hurricane Recovery, Sustainability, 11, 516, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020516, 2019. a
Mudassir, G.: Social-Based Physical Reconstruction Planning in Case of Natural Disaster: A Machine Learning Approach, in: Research Challenges in Information Science, edited by: Dalpiaz, F., Zdravkovic, J., and Loucopoulos, P., Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 604–612, Springer International Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50316-1_44, 2020.
Muskat, B., Nakanishi, H., and Blackman, D.: Integrating tourism into disaster recovery management: the case of the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami 2011, CABI Series in Tourism Management Research, 97–115, https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1079/9781780643250.0097 (last access: 10 October 2023), 2015. a
Mutch, C.: The role of schools in disaster preparedness, response and recovery: what can we learn from the literature?, Pastoral Care in Education, 32, 5–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2014.880123, 2014. a
Nakanishi, H. and Black, J.: Implicit and explicit knowledge in flood evacuations with a case study of Takamatsu, Japan, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 28, 788–797, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.008, 2018. a, b, c, d
Naserieh, S., Ghofrani, H., Shoja-Taheri, J., Dezvareh, M., and Mirzaei Alavijeh, H.: Strong Ground-Motion Characteristics Observed in the November 12, 2017, Mw7.3 Sarpol-e Zahab, Iran Earthquake, J. Earthq. Eng., 26, 3488–3505, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1806950, 2022. a
Nelson, D. R., Adger, W. N., and Brown, K.: Adaptation to Environmental Change: Contributions of a Resilience Framework, Annu. Rev. Env. Resour., 32, 395–419, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348, 2007. a
Oliver-Smith, A.: Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction and Social Inequality: A Challenge to Policy and Practice, Disasters, 14, 7–19, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.1990.tb00968.x, 1990. a
Olshansky, R. B.: Planning after hurricane Katrina, J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 72, 147–153, https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976735, 2006. a
Omarzadeh, D., Karimzadeh, S., Matsuoka, M., and Feizizadeh, B.: Earthquake Aftermath from Very High-Resolution WorldView-2 Image and Semi-Automated Object-Based Image Analysis (Case Study: Kermanshah, Sarpol-e Zahab, Iran), Remote Sens., 13, 4272, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214272, 2021. a
Ouyang, M.: Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe, 121, 43–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.040, 2014. a
Ouyang, M., Dueñas-Osorio, L., and Min, X.: A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems, Struct. Saf., 36–37, 23–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004, 2012.
Ouyang, M., Liu, C., and Xu, M.: Value of resilience-based solutions on critical infrastructure protection: Comparing with robustness-based solutions, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe, 190, 106506, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106506, 2019.
Pant, R., Barker, K., and Zobel, C. W.: Static and dynamic metrics of economic resilience for interdependent infrastructure and industry sectors, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe, 125, 92–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.09.007, 2014. a
Parker, R. S.: Hazards of Nature, Risks to Development, The World Bank, https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6650-9, 2006. a
Peacock, W., Morrow, B. H., and Gladwin, H.: Hurricane Andrew and the reshaping of Miami: Ethnicity, gender, and the socio-political ecology of disasters, Routledge, London, 1st edn., https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203351628, 1997. a
Perce, K. H.: Disaster recovery: lessons learned from an occupational health and human resources perspective, AAOHN journal: official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses, 55, 235–240, https://doi.org/10.1177/216507990705500603, 2007. a
Platt, S. and So, E.: Speed or deliberation: a comparison of post-disaster recovery in Japan, Turkey, and Chile, Disasters, 41, 696–727, https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12219, 2017. a
Quarantelli, E. L.: The Disaster Recovery Process: What We Know And Do Not Know From Research, in: International Forum on Civil Protection, 20 March 1999, Foligno, Italy, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:128100676 (last access: 10 October 2023), 1999. a
Raju, E. and Becker, P.: Multi-organisational coordination for disaster recovery: The story of post-tsunami Tamil Nadu, India, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 4, 82–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.02.004, 2013. a, b
Rinaldi, S., Peerenboom, J., and Kelly, T.: Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies, IEEE Contr. Syst. Mag., 21, 11–25, https://doi.org/10.1109/37.969131, 2001. a
Rind, D.: Complexity and Climate, Science, 284, 105–107, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5411.105, 1999. a
Ritchie, H. and Roser, M.: Urbanization, Our World in Data, https://ourworldindata.org/urbanization (last access: 24 October 2023), 2018. a
Rodríguez, H., Donner, W., and Trainor, J. E. (Eds.): Handbook of Disaster Research, Springer International Publishing, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4, 2018. a
Rosato, V., Pietro, A. D., Kotzanikolaou, P., Stergiopoulos, G., and Smedile, G.: Integrating Resilience in Time-based Dependency Analysis: A Large-Scale Case Study for Urban Critical Infrastructures, in: Issues on Risk Analysis for Critical Infrastructure Protection, edited by: Rosato, V. and Pietro, A. D., chap. 5, IntechOpen, Rijeka, https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97809, 2021.
Rosenheim, N., Guidotti, R., Gardoni, P., and Peacock, W. G.: Integration of detailed household and housing unit characteristic data with critical infrastructure for post-hazard resilience modeling, Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 6, 385–401, https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2019.1681821, 2021.
Rotimi, J. O., Wilkinson, S., Zuo, K., and Myburgh, D.: Legislation for effective post‐disaster reconstruction, Int. J. Strateg. Prop. M., 13, 143–152, https://doi.org/10.3846/1648-715X.2009.13.143-152, 2009. a
Rubin, C. B.: Long Term Recovery from Disasters – The Neglected Component of Emergency Management, J. Homel. Secur. Emerg., 6, 46, https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1616, 2009. a, b
Rubin, C. B. and Barbee, D. G.: Disaster Recovery and Hazard Mitigation: Bridging the Intergovernmental Gap, Public Admin. Rev., 45, 57–63, https://doi.org/10.2307/3134998, 1985. a, b
Runkle, J. D., Brock-Martin, A., Karmaus, W., and Svendsen, E. R.: Secondary Surge Capacity: A Framework for Understanding Long-Term Access to Primary Care for Medically Vulnerable Populations in Disaster Recovery, Am. J. Public Health, 102, e24–e32, https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301027, 2012. a
Rus, K., Kilar, V., and Koren, D.: Resilience assessment of complex urban systems to natural disasters: A new literature review, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 31, 311–330, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015, 2018. a, b
Ryan, R., Wortley, L., and She, E.: Evaluations of post-disaster recovery: A review of practice material, Evidence Base, 4, 1–33, https://doi.org/10.21307/eb-2016-001, 2016. a
Rykiel Jr., E. J.: Towards a definition of ecological disturbance, Aust. J. Ecol., 10, 361–365, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1985.tb00897.x, 1985. a
Sadiqi, Z., Trigunarsyah, B., and Coffey, V.: A framework for community participation in post-disaster housing reconstruction projects: A case of Afghanistan, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 900–912, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.008, 2017. a
Schlumberger, J., Stuparu, D., Ciurean, R., Duncan, M., Mysiak, J., Khazai, B., Dochiu, C., and Claassen, J.: D1.3 – Report on policies, policy-making processes, and governance for multi-hazard, multi-risk management, https://www.myriadproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/D1.3_Review-of-policy-and-governance_v3.pdf, project deliverable MYRIAD-EU (last access: 24 October 2023), 2022. a
Sevieri, G., Galasso, C., D'Ayala, D., De Jesus, R., Oreta, A., Grio, M. E. D. A., and Ibabao, R.: A multi-hazard risk prioritisation framework for cultural heritage assets, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1391–1414, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1391-2020, 2020. a
Shaw, R., Gupta, M., and Sarma, A.: Community recovery and its sustainability: Lessons from Gujarat earthquake of India, The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 18, 28–34, 2003. a
Smith, G., Martin, A., and Wenger, D. E.: Disaster Recovery in an Era of Climate Change: The Unrealized Promise of Institutional Resilience, in: Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by: Rodríguez, H., Donner, W., and Trainor, J. E., Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, 595–619, Springer International Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_28, 2018. a
Smith, G. P. and Wenger, D.: Sustainable Disaster Recovery: Operationalizing An Existing Agenda, in: Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by: Rodríguez, H., Quarantelli, E. L., and Dynes, R. R., Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, 234–257, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_14, 2007. a, b, c, d, e
Snyder, H.: Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines, J. Bus. Res., 104, 333–339, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039, 2019. a
Sobhaninia, S. and Buckman, S. T.: Revisiting and adapting the Kates-Pijawka disaster recovery model: A reconfigured emphasis on anticipation, equity, and resilience, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 69, 102738, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102738, 2022. a, b, c, d
Soltani-Sobh, A., Heaslip, K., Scarlatos, P., and Kaisar, E.: Reliability based pre-positioning of recovery centers for resilient transportation infrastructure, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 19, 324–333, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.09.004, 2016. a
Sovacool, B. K.: Don’t let disaster recovery perpetuate injustice, Nature, 549, 433–433, https://doi.org/10.1038/549433a, 2017. a
Staupe-Delgado, R.: Overcoming Barriers to Proactive Response in Slow-onset Disasters. Contributing Paper to GAR 2019, https://www.preventionweb.net/publications/view/66508 (last access: 24 October 2023), 2019. a
Su, Y. and Le Dé, L.: Whose views matter in post-disaster recovery? A case study of “build back better” in Tacloban City after Typhoon Haiyan, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 51, 101786, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101786, 2020. a
Sullivan, M.: Integrated Recovery Management: A New Way of Looking at a Delicate Process, The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 18, 4–27, 2003. a
Talbot, J., Poleacovschi, C., Hamideh, S., and Santos-Rivera, C.: Informality in Postdisaster Reconstruction: The Role of Social Capital in Reconstruction Management in Post–Hurricane Maria Puerto Rico, J. Manage. Eng., 36, 04020074, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000833, 2020. a
Tanner, T., Mitchell, T., Polack, E., and Guenther, B.: Urban Governance for Adaptation: Assessing Climate Change Resilience in Ten Asian Cities, IDS Working Papers, 2009, 01–47, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2009.00315_2.x, 2009. a
Tatham, P. and Houghton, L.: The wicked problem of humanitarian logistics and disaster relief aid, Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 1, 15–31, https://doi.org/10.1108/20426741111122394, 2011. a
Terzi, S., De Angeli, S., Miozzo, D., Massucchielli, L. S., Szarzynski, J., Carturan, F., and Boni, G.: Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy to advance multi-hazard disaster risk management, Progress in Disaster Science, 16, 100268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100268, 2022. a, b
Thomalla, F., Lebel, L., Boyland, M., Marks, D., Kimkong, H., Tan, S. B., and Nugroho, A.: Long-term recovery narratives following major disasters in Southeast Asia, Reg. Environ. Change, 18, 1211–1222, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1260-z, 2018. a
Tierney, K. and Oliver-Smith, A.: Social Dimensions of Disaster Recovery, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 30, 123–146, https://doi.org/10.1177/028072701203000210, 2012. a, b
Tilloy, A., Malamud, B. D., Winter, H., and Joly-Laugel, A.: A review of quantification methodologies for multi-hazard interrelationships, Earth-Sci. Rev., 196, 102881, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102881, 2019. a
Twigg, J.: Disaster risk reduction, Overseas Development Institute, Humanitarian Policy Group London, https://odihpn.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/GPR-9-web-string-1.pdf (last access: 8 October 2023), 2015. a
UNDRR: International Recovery Platform, https://recovery.preventionweb.net/international-recovery-platform (last access: 25 September 2023), 2022. a
Vale, L. J. and Campanella, T. J.: The Resilient City: How Modern Cities Recover from Disaster, Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195175844.001.0001, 2005. a
Šakić Trogrlić, R., Rijke, J., Dolman, N., and Zevenbergen, C.: Rebuild by Design in Hoboken: A Design Competition as a Means for Achieving Flood Resilience of Urban Areas through the Implementation of Green Infrastructure, Water, 10, 553, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10050553, 2018. a
Šakić Trogrlić, R., Duncan, M., Wright, G., van den Homberg, M., Adeloye, A., Mwale, F., and McQuistan, C.: External stakeholders’ attitudes towards and engagement with local knowledge in disaster risk reduction: are we only paying lip service?, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 58, 102196, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102196, 2021. a
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., and Kinzig, A.: Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems, Ecol. Soc., 9, 5, 2004. a
Ward, P. J., Daniell, J., Duncan, M., Dunne, A., Hananel, C., Hochrainer-Stigler, S., Tijssen, A., Torresan, S., Ciurean, R., Gill, J. C., Sillmann, J., Couasnon, A., Koks, E., Padrón-Fumero, N., Tatman, S., Tronstad Lund, M., Adesiyun, A., Aerts, J. C. J. H., Alabaster, A., Bulder, B., Campillo Torres, C., Critto, A., Hernández-Martín, R., Machado, M., Mysiak, J., Orth, R., Palomino Antolín, I., Petrescu, E.-C., Reichstein, M., Tiggeloven, T., Van Loon, A. F., Vuong Pham, H., and de Ruiter, M. C.: Invited perspectives: A research agenda towards disaster risk management pathways in multi-(hazard-)risk assessment, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1487–1497, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1487-2022, 2022. a, b
Wilkinson, C.: Social-ecological resilience: Insights and issues for planning theory, Planning Theory, 11, 148–169, https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095211426274, 2012. a
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., and Pawson, R.: RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews, BMC Med., 11, 20, https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-20, 2013. a
World Bank Group: Sierra Leone Rapid Damage and Loss Assessment of August 14th, 2017 Landslides and Floods in the Western Area, World Bank, https://doi.org/10.1596/28836, 2017. a
World Bank Group, United Nations, and European Union: Malawi Drought 2015–2016: Post-Disaster Needs Assessment, World Bank, https://doi.org/10.1596/25781, 2016. a
Xu, Z., Ramirez-Marquez, J. E., Liu, Y., and Xiahou, T.: A new resilience-based component importance measure for multi-state networks, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 193, 106591, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106591, 2020.
Yadollahie, M.: The Flood in Iran: A Consequence of the Global Warming?, The International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 10, 54–56, https://doi.org/10.15171/ijoem.2019.1681, 2019. a
Yamaguchi, R., Sato, M., and Ueta, K.: Measuring Regional Wealth and Assessing Sustainable Development: An Application to a Disaster-Torn Region in Japan, Soc. Indic. Res., 129, 365–389, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1106-3, 2016. a
Yu, J.-Z. and Baroud, H.: Modeling Uncertain and Dynamic Interdependencies of Infrastructure Systems Using Stochastic Block Models, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 6, 020906, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046472, 2020.
Zamanifar, M. and Hartmann, T.: Optimization-based decision-making models for disaster recovery and reconstruction planning of transportation networks, Nat. Hazards, 104, 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04192-5, 2020. a, b, c
Zhang, J., Zhang, M., and Li, G.: Multi-stage composition of urban resilience and the influence of pre-disaster urban functionality on urban resilience, Nat. Hazards, 107, 447–473, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04590-3, 2021. a, b, c
Zhang, Q.: Disaster response and recovery: Aid and social change, Annals of Anthropological Practice, 40, 86–97, https://doi.org/10.1111/napa.12090, 2016. a
Zhang, W. and Wang, N.: Resilience-based risk mitigation for road networks, Struct. Saf., 62, 57–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.06.003, 2016. a
Özerdem, A. and Rufini, G.: L'Aquila's reconstruction challenges: has Italy learned from its previous earthquake disasters?, Disasters, 37, 119–143, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01296.x, 2013. a
Short summary
This paper critically reviews disaster recovery literature from a multi-risk perspective. Identified key challenges encompass the lack of approaches integrating physical reconstruction and socio-economic recovery, the neglect of multi-risk interactions, the limited exploration of recovery from a pre-disaster planning perspective, and the low consideration of disaster recovery as a non-linear process in which communities need change over time.
This paper critically reviews disaster recovery literature from a multi-risk perspective....
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint