Articles | Volume 24, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4015-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4015-2024
Invited perspectives
 | Highlight paper
 | 
26 Nov 2024
Invited perspectives | Highlight paper |  | 26 Nov 2024

Invited perspectives: safeguarding the usability and credibility of flood hazard and risk assessments

Bruno Merz, Günter Blöschl, Robert Jüpner, Heidi Kreibich, Kai Schröter, and Sergiy Vorogushyn

Viewed

Total article views: 560 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
353 170 37 560 28 31
  • HTML: 353
  • PDF: 170
  • XML: 37
  • Total: 560
  • BibTeX: 28
  • EndNote: 31
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Mar 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Mar 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 560 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 546 with geography defined and 14 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Nov 2024
Download
Executive editor
The manuscript addresses an important topic of the useful and correct use of flood hazard and risk assessment approaches. It could serve as a benchmark overview of best practice and thus be of enormous value for the flood hazard community and any related application out of this. The manuscript addresses the important role of stakeholder participation, objectivity, and verifiability when assessing flood hazard and risk.
Short summary
Flood risk assessments help us decide how to reduce the risk of flooding. Since these assessments are based on probabilities, it is hard to check their accuracy by comparing them to past data. We suggest a new way to validate these assessments, making sure they are practical for real-life decisions. This approach looks at both the technical details and the real-world situations where decisions are made. We demonstrate its practicality by applying it to flood emergency planning.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint