Brief communication: On the extremeness of the July 2021 precipitation event in western Germany
The weather extremity index (WEI) and the cross-scale WEI (xWEI) are useful for determining the extremeness of precipitation events. Both require the estimation of return periods across different precipitation duration levels. For this purpose, previous studies determined annual precipitation maxima from radar composites in Germany and estimated the parameters of a generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution. Including the year 2021 in the estimation of GEV parameters, the devastating event in July 2021 drops from a rank of first to fourth regarding the WEI compared to all events between 2001 and 2020 but remains the most extreme regarding the xWEI. This emphasizes that it was extreme across multiple spatial and temporal scales and the importance of considering different scales to determine the extremeness of rainfall events.
In July 2021, an extreme precipitation event took place in western Germany (Fig. 1, left) and neighbouring countries which caused one of the most severe natural disasters in Germany and Europe. In Germany, more than 180 people lost their lives (more than 140 in Rhineland-Palatinate and more than 40 in North Rhine-Westphalia). According to Munich Re, loss and damage amounted to EUR 46 billion (MunichRE, 2022), EUR 33 billion of which was in Germany alone. The German Insurance Association (GDV) reported a new record of EUR 8.2 billion in insured flood losses for a single event (GDV, 2021). Numerous studies have been published since the event, e.g. related to meteorological, hydrological and impact-related aspects (Mohr et al., 2023); hydro-geomorphological processes (Dietze et al., 2022); or early warning (Fekete and Sandholz, 2021; Thieken et al., 2022a). The temporal development of the event (Fig. 1, right) indicates heavy precipitation at several scales from showers of a few hours up to continuous rainfall for more than a day. With regard to the extremeness of the event's precipitation, Germany's National Meteorological Service (Deutscher Wetterdienst; DWD hereafter) estimated return periods of well over 100 years for large parts of North Rhine-Westphalia and Rhineland-Palatinate (Junghänel et al., 2021). Mohr et al. (2023) reported return periods of more than 700 years over large areas.
Junghänel et al. (2021) and Dietze et al. (2022) highlighted that an important feature of the July 2021 precipitation event was not only high rainfall accumulation at a large spatial extent but also the occurrence of high return periods at various durations as well as a remarkable heterogeneity in space. In order to account for such complex events and to formalize the quantification of their extremeness, Müller and Kaspar (2014) have suggested (in this journal) the weather extremity index (WEI). The WEI identifies the spatial and temporal scale at which an event was most extreme and allows for quantifying the extremeness (rarity) of an event by averaging return periods of all affected pixels and multiplying it with a measure of the spatial extent of this event (see Sect. 3). It has been increasingly used since then (Gvoždíková et al., 2019; Minářová et al., 2018) and was also established as a routine measure of extremeness by the DWD (Lengfeld et al., 2021). Based on the German operational radar data, the DWD has quantified the WEI of the event to be 227 ln(yr)km. With this value, the event outranked all other events based on radar data that were previously classified in the period from 2001 to 2020.
Recently, Voit and Heistermann (2022) have argued in their contribution to this special issue that the WEI could be supplemented in order to account for events that are not only extreme at a distinct spatial and temporal scale. Instead, such events could be extreme across various scales – a feature that also appeared to characterize the July 2021 event. Hence, Voit and Heistermann (2022) defined the cross-scale weather extremity index (xWEI) and found that, on the basis of the xWEI, the July 2021 event outranked other extreme events by far.
However, the estimates of the WEI and xWEI that have so far been obtained for the July 2021 event by the DWD and Voit and Heistermann (2022) share a limitation: the parameters of the underlying generalized extreme value (GEV) distributions were estimated based on the RADKLIM (Radarklimatologie) dataset – a reanalysis of the DWD's procedure for radar-based quantitative precipitation estimation. As the RADKLIM data used for that purpose did not yet contain data from 2021, the July 2021 event was not included in the estimation of GEV parameters. The extremeness of the event might hence have been overestimated.
In June 2022 the DWD published the updated RADKLIM reanalysis (Winterrath et al., 2018) which now includes data from 2001 to 2021. This provides the opportunity to reassess, in this brief communication, the extremeness of the July 2021 event on the basis of the most recent homogeneous radar reanalysis, using both the established WEI and the xWEI as a supplement to account for extremity across scales.
In Sect. 2, we introduce the underlying datasets, RADOLAN (Radar Online Aneichung), RADKLIM and CatRaRE (Catalogue of Radar-based heavy Rainfall Events). Section 3 summarizes the concept and the computation of the two extremity indices, the WEI and xWEI. In Sect. 4, we present an assessment of the five highest-ranking extreme events in the most recent RADKLIM dataset and the changes introduced by including or excluding the data from the year of their occurrence. Section 5 summarizes our findings and highlights implications for research and risk management.
Our analysis of the July 2021 event is based on two different sets of gauge-adjusted, hourly precipitation data. (i) The operational RADOLAN RW (hourly) product (RADOLAN, 2022) always uses the most recent algorithms for data processing and is available in real time. (ii) RADKLIM (RADKLIM v2017.002; see Winterrath et al., 2017, 2018), in turn, is a reanalysis of radar data since 2001: it is based on a homogeneous set of algorithms, includes advanced climatological corrections, and uses additional hourly and daily rainfall data from rain gauges that were not available in real time.
Based on RADKLIM, the DWD provides a Catalogue of Radar-based heavy Rainfall Events (CatRaRE) containing rainfall events in Germany of 11 durations between 1 and 72 h since 2001 that exceed the DWD's warning level 3 for severe weather in terms of precipitation rate.
Müller and Kaspar (2014) defined the so-called weather extremity index (WEI) that takes into account the affected area A and the rareness of an event (in form of the return period T, years) for various durations. At a given duration t (hours), the extremity Et,A (ln(yr)km) amounts to
for grid points i. The maximum Et,A over all durations is then defined as the WEI and determines the spatial extent and duration of the most extreme stage of an event.
Following Lengfeld et al. (2021), we used the DWD's national radar composite data to first determine annual precipitation maxima and then estimate the GEV parameters. The whole area affected by the event, as defined in CatRaRE, is taken into account for the calculation of the WEI. We used two different combinations of radar data and GEV parameter estimates: (1) the real-time setup with an estimation of GEV parameters based on RADKLIM data from 2001 to 2020 (not including the July 2021 event) combined with operational hourly rainfall sums from RADOLAN and (2) the climatological setup with an estimation of GEV parameters based on RADKLIM data from 2001 to 2021 combined with reprocessed hourly rainfall sums from RADKLIM. The dataset only spans 21 years of observations. Therefore, we assumed stationarity within the dataset. The differences between the RADOLAN and the RADKLIM data did not influence the results significantly (refer to Table 1). Therefore, the focus of this study lies on the effect of including or excluding data from 2021 in the estimation of GEV parameters. In order to contextualize this effect, we estimated the GEV parameters and hence the WEI for the five highest-ranking events between 2001 and 2021 with and without including their year of occurrence.
The retrieval of the xWEI was documented in detail by Voit and Heistermann (2022). The fundamental idea of the xWEI is to integrate the extremeness Et,A across spatial scales and all regarded duration levels instead of searching for a maximum of Et,A. This integration is, again, based on the aforementioned Et,A curves which, for each duration, display Et,A across spatial scales. We now interpret these curves in a three-dimensional coordinate system in which the x axis represents the area, the y axis represents the duration and the z axis represents Et,A. Together, these curves span a surface.
The volume underneath this surface corresponds to the cross-scale extremeness (xWEI) of an event (Voit and Heistermann, 2022). To keep the results comparable, we used the same bounds for the computation of the xWEI as in our previous study (Voit and Heistermann, 2022), with duration levels from 1 to 72 h and a bounding box of 200 km × 200 km around the centroid of the event:
Figure 2 illustrates how the Et,A curves changed after the most recent RADKLIM reanalysis was included in the estimation of GEV parameters in the “climatological” setup: as expected, Et,A reaches lower values across all durations and areas than in the “real-time” setup. On average, maximum Et,A values are 20 %–30 % lower for all relevant durations. The overall structure of the Et,A curves remains dominated by long durations between 12 and 72 h. Shorter durations of 4 to 6 h do not reach Et,A values of 100 ln(yr)km; durations up to 3 h are even less pronounced. The most extreme stage for the July event is in both cases reached for a duration of 48 h.
Table 1 puts the WEI and xWEI of the five most extreme events according to CatRaRE v2022.01 into context and also shows the changes in the WEI and xWEI for the events, depending on including or excluding the year of their occurrence for quantification. For the July 2021 event, the values of the WEI and xWEI changed from 227 to 179 ln(yr)km (−48) and from 3731 to 3134 (−597), respectively. Based on the updated WEI values, the July 2021 event no longer outranks all other events but now ranks fourth. The most extreme event according to the WEI, with a value of 208 ln(yr)km, occurred in Saxony in August 2002 and led to the devastating flood along the Elbe River. This event had the largest extremity at a duration of 24 h and precipitation of 87 mm in the 24 h averaged over the affected area. The events in second and third place in July 2017 and 2002 both lasted 48 h and are, thus, more similar to the July 2021 event. Their WEI is only slightly higher with 188 and 180 ln(yr)km, respectively. Both events have lower mean precipitation values of 85 mm compared to the July 2021 event with 91 mm but larger spatial extents. This underlines the sensitivity of the WEI to the affected area. Note that due to computational efficiency only a fixed set of duration levels (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 48 and 72 h) was considered. The actual duration at which the events were most extreme might be somewhere between these fixed levels. With regard to the updated xWEI, however, the July 2021 event (still) appears to be the most extreme event out of these five. If ranked according to the xWEI, the 2002 Saxony event would be ranked second, followed by the Berlin 2017 event and the two events in Lower Saxony (2002 and 2017).
The WEI and xWEI of the other four events in Table 1 did not change with the updated GEV parameters when excluding the year 2021 in their estimation. However, we repeated the computation of the WEI and xWEI by leaving out the year of the events' occurrences in the estimation of the GEV parameters (values in brackets). That way, we could appraise the sensitivity of the WEI and xWEI to the underlying database. In all cases, both the WEI and xWEI increased noticeably by 35 to 48 ln(yr)km and 482 to 795, respectively, when the year of occurrence was excluded from the GEV parameter estimation. Yet, considering only the values in brackets, the ranking remained the same for both the WEI and xWEI.
Quantifying the extremeness of precipitation events and ranking past events accordingly can help researchers, stakeholders and the general public to objectively put different extreme events into context. Based on the weather extremity index (WEI) and the cross-scale weather extremity index (xWEI), we reassessed the extremeness of the disastrous heavy rainfall event which took place in western Germany in July 2021. To that end, we used the most recent reanalysis of the DWD's climatological weather radar data (RADKLIM).
While the impact of the July 2021 event was unique, our analysis reveals that it was just the fourth most extreme event in the period from 2001–2021, according to the WEI. Before having included the recent RADKLIM data in the GEV parameter estimation, the event had been considered the most extreme. This shows how sensitive the WEI and xWEI are to the underlying extreme value statistics, especially because we are dealing with quite short radar time series (20 years). According to the xWEI, however, we found that the July 2021 event still outranks all other events within the recent RADKLIM dataset. This emphasizes, on a formal basis, previous reports that one of the key features of the July 2021 event was its extremeness across spatial and temporal scales. Thieken et al. (2022b) framed the Elbe flood event that followed the August 2002 precipitation (ranked first in Table 1) as a “compound inland flood”, in the sense that different flood mechanisms overlaid and amplified each other. Similar observations were made for the July 2021 event (e.g. Mohr et al., 2023). Given the exceptional xWEI values of both the August 2002 and the July 2021 events, it might be worthy to discuss, in the future, whether heavy precipitation events that are extreme across scales could be framed as hydro-meteorological compound events. Mohr et al. (2023) also suggested that, originating from the weeks before the event, the antecedent soil moisture in the affected region was relatively high, favouring the occurrence of saturation excess and thus an enhanced rainfall-runoff transformation.
But while the xWEI implies that the July 2021 event in fact outranked others, we need to acknowledge that the top-ranking events are relatively close in terms of the WEI and xWEI. Hence, the resulting rankings should not be overinterpreted, especially if we consider uncertainties regarding the radar rainfall estimation, the estimation of return periods and the selection of the spatial domain. Indeed, the highest-ranking events appear quite similar with regard to their extremeness. Their occurrence in very different regions of Germany suggests that such types of events could effectively take place anywhere in Germany and might be considered hydro-meteorological reference events for research and disaster risk management throughout the country. The impact of such events on the ground, however, will vary dramatically based on governing hydrological and hydro-geomorphological processes as well as exposure and vulnerability. This is demonstrated by the two extreme events that occurred in Lower Saxony, the impacts of which appeared to be less severe or at least were less visible in the national media. We hence consider it important to assess the potential impacts of such events anywhere across Germany or central Europe.
The DWD open-data servers make publicly available the RADKLIM dataset (https://doi.org/10.5676/DWD/RADKLIM_RW_V2017.002; Winterrath et al., 2018) and the CatRaRE catalogue (https://doi.org/10.5676/DWD/CatRaRE_W3_Eta_v2022.01; Lengfeld et al., 2022). The code and exemplary data for the computation of the xWEI is published in the following repository: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6556463 (Voit, 2022).
All authors conceptualized the study. KL and PV carried out the statistical analysis. KL prepared the figures. All authors prepared the manuscript.
At least one of the (co-)authors is a guest member of the editorial board of Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences for the special issue “Past and future European atmospheric extreme events under climate change”. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the special issue “Past and future European atmospheric extreme events under climate change”. It is not associated with a conference.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
This research has been partially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant no. GPK 2043, project no. 251036843).
This paper was edited by Uwe Ulbrich and reviewed by Marc Schleiss and two anonymous referees.
Dietze, M., Bell, R., Ozturk, U., Cook, K. L., Andermann, C., Beer, A. R., Damm, B., Lucia, A., Fauer, F. S., Nissen, K. M., Sieg, T., and Thieken, A. H.: More than heavy rain turning into fast-flowing water – a landscape perspective on the 2021 Eifel floods, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1845–1856, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1845-2022, 2022. a, b
Fekete, A. and Sandholz, S.: Here Comes the Flood, but Not Failure? Lessons to Learn after the Heavy Rain and Pluvial Floods in Germany 2021, Water, 13, 3016, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13213016, 2021. a
GDV: 2021 teuerstes Naturgefahrenjahr für die Versicherer, https://www.gdv.de/de/medien/aktuell/2021-teuerstes- naturgefahrenjahr-fuer-die-versicherer-74092 (last access: 22 September 2022), 2021 (in German). a
Gvoždíková, B., Müller, M., and Kašpar, M.: Spatial patterns and time distribution of central European extreme precipitation events between 1961 and 2013, Int. J. Climatol., 39, 3282–3297, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6019, 2019. a
Junghänel, T., Bisolli, P., Daßler, J., Fleckenstein, R., Imbery, F., Janssen, W., Kaspar, F., Lengfeld, K., Leppelt, T., Rauthe, M., Rauthe-Schöch, A., Rocek, M., Walawender, E., and Weigl, E.: Hydro-klimatologische Einordnung der Stark- und Dauerniederschläge in Teilen Deutschlands im Zusammenhang mit dem Tiefdruckgebiet “Bernd” vom 12. bis 19. Juli 2021, Deutscher Wetterdienst, https://www.dwd.de/DE/leistungen/besondereereignisse/niederschlag/20210721_bericht_starkniederschlaege_tief_bernd.pdf (last access: 17 March 2023), 2021. a, b
Lengfeld, K., Walawender, E., Winterrath, T., and Becker, A.: CatRaRE: A Catalogue of radar-based heavy rainfall events in Germany derived from 20 years of data, Meteorol. Z., 30, 469–487, https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2021/1088, 2021. a, b, c
Lengfeld, K., Walawender, E., Winterrath, T., Weigl, E., and Becker, A.: Heavy precipitation events Version 2022.01 exceeding DWD warning level 3 for severe weather based on RADKLIM-RW Version 2017.002, Parameter and polygons of heavy precipitation events in Germany, Version v2022.01, Deutscher Wetterdienst [data set], https://doi.org/10.5676/DWD/CatRaRE_W3_Eta_v2022.01, 2022. a, b
Minářová, J., Müller, M., Clappier, A., and Kašpar, M.: Comparison of extreme precipitation characteristics between the Ore Mountains and the Vosges Mountains (Europe), Theor. Appl. Climatol., 133, 1249–1268, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2247-x, 2018. a
Mohr, S., Ehret, U., Kunz, M., Ludwig, P., Caldas-Alvarez, A., Daniell, J. E., Ehmele, F., Feldmann, H., Franca, M. J., Gattke, C., Hundhausen, M., Knippertz, P., Küpfer, K., Mühr, B., Pinto, J. G., Quinting, J., Schäfer, A. M., Scheibel, M., Seidel, F., and Wisotzky, C.: A multi-disciplinary analysis of the exceptional flood event of July 2021 in central Europe – Part 1: Event description and analysis, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 525–551, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-525-2023, 2023. a, b, c, d
MunichRE: Hurrikane, Kältewellen, Tornados: Wetterkatastrophen in USA dominieren Naturkatastrophen-Schadenstatistik 2021, https://www.munichre.com/de/unternehmen/media-relations/medieninformationen-und-unternehmensnachrichten/medieninformationen/2022/bilanz-naturkatastrophen-2021.html, last access: 22 September 2022 (in German). a
RADOLAN: Historical hourly RADOLAN grids of precipitation depth, Open Data German Meteorological Service (DWD) [data set], https://opendata.dwd.de/climate_environment/CDC/grids_germany/hourly/radolan/historical/ (last access: 17 March 2023), 2022. a
Thieken, A. H., Bubeck, P., Heidenreich, A., von Keyserlingk, J., Dillenardt, L., and Otto, A.: Performance of the flood warning system in Germany in July 2021 – insights from affected residents, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-244, 2022a. a
Thieken, A. H., Samprogna Mohor, G., Kreibich, H., and Müller, M.: Compound inland flood events: different pathways, different impacts and different coping options, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 165–185, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-165-2022, 2022b. a
Voit, P. and Heistermann, M.: A new index to quantify the extremeness of precipitation across scales, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2791–2805, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2791-2022, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f
Winterrath, T., Brendel, C., Hafer, M., Junghänel, T., Klameth, A., Walawender, E., Weigl, E., and Becker, A.: Erstellung einer radargestützten Niederschlagsklimatologie, Berichte des Deutschen Wetterdienstes Nr. 251, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach am Main, https://www.dwd.de/DE/leistungen/pbfb_verlag_berichte/pdf_einzelbaende/251_pdf.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 (last access: 17 March 2023), 2017 (in German). a
Winterrath, T., Brendel, C., Hafer, M., Junghänel, T., Klameth, A., Lengfeld, K., Walawender, E., Weigl, E., and Becker, A.: Gauge-adjusted one-hour precipitation sum (RW), RADKLIM Version 2017.002: Reprocessed gauge-adjusted radar data, one-hour precipitation sums (RW), Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD) [data set], https://doi.org/10.5676/DWD/RADKLIM_RW_V2017.002, 2018. a, b, c, d