Articles | Volume 22, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-577-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-577-2022
Research article
 | 
25 Feb 2022
Research article |  | 25 Feb 2022

Nowcasting thunderstorm hazards using machine learning: the impact of data sources on performance

Jussi Leinonen, Ulrich Hamann, Urs Germann, and John R. Mecikalski

Related authors

Exploiting radar polarimetry for nowcasting thunderstorm hazards using deep learning
Nathalie Rombeek, Jussi Leinonen, and Ulrich Hamann
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 133–144, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-133-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-133-2024, 2024
Short summary
Reconstruction of the mass and geometry of snowfall particles from multi-angle snowflake camera (MASC) images
Jussi Leinonen, Jacopo Grazioli, and Alexis Berne
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6851–6866, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6851-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6851-2021, 2021
Short summary
Unsupervised classification of snowflake images using a generative adversarial network and K-medoids classification
Jussi Leinonen and Alexis Berne
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2949–2964, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2949-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2949-2020, 2020
Short summary
Marine liquid cloud geometric thickness retrieved from OCO-2's oxygen A-band spectrometer
Mark Richardson, Jussi Leinonen, Heather Q. Cronk, James McDuffie, Matthew D. Lebsock, and Graeme L. Stephens
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 1717–1737, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1717-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1717-2019, 2019
Short summary
Retrieval of snowflake microphysical properties from multifrequency radar observations
Jussi Leinonen, Matthew D. Lebsock, Simone Tanelli, Ousmane O. Sy, Brenda Dolan, Randy J. Chase, Joseph A. Finlon, Annakaisa von Lerber, and Dmitri Moisseev
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5471–5488, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5471-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5471-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric, Meteorological and Climatological Hazards
GTDI: a game-theory-based integrated drought index implying hazard-causing and hazard-bearing impact change
Xiaowei Zhao, Tianzeng Yang, Hongbo Zhang, Tian Lan, Chaowei Xue, Tongfang Li, Zhaoxia Ye, Zhifang Yang, and Yurou Zhang
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3479–3495, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3479-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3479-2024, 2024
Short summary
Insurance loss model vs. meteorological loss index – how comparable are their loss estimates for European windstorms?
Julia Moemken, Inovasita Alifdini, Alexandre M. Ramos, Alexandros Georgiadis, Aidan Brocklehurst, Lukas Braun, and Joaquim G. Pinto
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3445–3460, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3445-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3445-2024, 2024
Short summary
Intense rains in Israel associated with the train effect
Baruch Ziv, Uri Dayan, Lidiya Shendrik, and Elyakom Vadislavsky
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3267–3277, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3267-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3267-2024, 2024
Short summary
Convection-permitting climate model representation of severe convective wind gusts and future changes in southeastern Australia
Andrew Brown, Andrew Dowdy, and Todd P. Lane
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3225–3243, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3225-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3225-2024, 2024
Short summary
On the potential of using smartphone sensors for wildfire hazard estimation through citizen science
Hofit Shachaf, Colin Price, Dorita Rostkier-Edelstein, and Cliff Mass
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3035–3047, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3035-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3035-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abrams, M., Crippen, R., and Fujisada, H.: ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM) and ASTER Global Water Body Dataset (ASTWBD), Remote Sens., 12, 1156, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071156, 2020. a
Autonès, F. and Claudon, M.: Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document for the Convection Product Processors of the NWC/GEO, Tech. Rep. SAF/NWC/CDOP/MFT/SCI/ATBD/11, Meteo-France, Toulouse, https://www.nwcsaf.org/Downloads/GEO/2018.1/Documents/Scientific_Docs/NWC-CDOP2-GEO-MFT-SCI-ATBD-Convection_v2.2.pdf (last access: 21 February 2022), 2012. a
Ayzel, G., Scheffer, T., and Heistermann, M.: RainNet v1.0: a convolutional neural network for radar-based precipitation nowcasting, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2631–2644, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2631-2020, 2020. a
Barras, H., Hering, A., Martynov, A., Noti, P.-A., Germann, U., and Martius, O.: Experiences with >50,000 Crowdsourced Hail Reports in Switzerland, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 1429–1440, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0090.1, 2019. a
Bedka, K., Murillo, E. M., Homeyer, C. R., Scarino, B., and Mersiovsky, H.: The Above-Anvil Cirrus Plume: An Important Severe Weather Indicator in Visible and Infrared Satellite Imagery, Weather Forecast., 33, 1159–1181, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-18-0040.1, 2018. a
Download
Short summary
We evaluate the usefulness of different data sources and variables to the short-term prediction (nowcasting) of severe thunderstorms using machine learning. Machine-learning models are trained with data from weather radars, satellite images, lightning detection and weather forecasts and with terrain elevation data. We analyze the benefits provided by each of the data sources to predicting hazards (heavy precipitation, lightning and hail) caused by the thunderstorms.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint