Articles | Volume 22, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2963-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2963-2022
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
08 Sep 2022
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 08 Sep 2022

Reliability of flood marks and practical relevance for flood hazard assessment in southwestern Germany

Annette Sophie Bösmeier, Iso Himmelsbach, and Stefan Seeger

Viewed

Total article views: 1,927 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,568 318 41 1,927 26 24
  • HTML: 1,568
  • PDF: 318
  • XML: 41
  • Total: 1,927
  • BibTeX: 26
  • EndNote: 24
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 May 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 May 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,927 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,744 with geography defined and 183 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 Feb 2024
Download
Executive editor
The paper addresses historical flood marks as a information source, coming to the conclusion that it is worthwhile to maintain them, and include them in scientific evaluations. The authors find, for example, plausible and historically sound reasons in changed local hydraulic conditions by flood protection walls, and effects of exceptional processes during a massive ice jam.
Short summary
Encouraging a systematic use of flood marks for more comprehensive flood risk management, we collected a large number of marks along the Kinzig, southwestern Germany, and tested them for plausibility and temporal continuance. Despite uncertainty, the marks appeared to be an overall consistent and practical source that may also increase flood risk awareness. A wide agreement between the current flood hazard maps and the collected flood marks moreover indicated a robust local hazard assessment.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint