Articles | Volume 22, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1819-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1819-2022
Invited perspectives
 | 
02 Jun 2022
Invited perspectives |  | 02 Jun 2022

Invited perspectives: When research meets practice: challenges, opportunities, and suggestions from the implementation of the Floods Directive in the largest Italian river basin

Tommaso Simonelli, Laura Zoppi, Daniela Molinari, and Francesco Ballio

Related authors

The value of multi-source data for improved flood damage modelling with explicit input data uncertainty treatment: INSYDE 2.0
Mario Di Bacco, Daniela Molinari, and Anna Rita Scorzini
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1681–1696, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1681-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1681-2024, 2024
Short summary
Qualitative flood risk assessment for road and railway infrastructures: the experience of the MOVIDA project
Natasha Petruccelli, Luca Mantecchini, Alice Gallazzi, Daniela Molinari, Mohammed Hammouti, Marco Zazzeri, Simone Sterlacchini, Francesco Ballio, Armando Brath, and Alessio Domeneghetti
Proc. IAHS, 385, 407–413, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-407-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-407-2024, 2024
Short summary
A conceptual model for the estimation of flood damage to power grids
Panagiotis Asaridis and Daniela Molinari
Adv. Geosci., 61, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-61-1-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-61-1-2023, 2023
Short summary
INSYDE-BE: adaptation of the INSYDE model to the Walloon region (Belgium)
Anna Rita Scorzini, Benjamin Dewals, Daniela Rodriguez Castro, Pierre Archambeau, and Daniela Molinari
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1743–1761, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1743-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1743-2022, 2022
Short summary
Brief communication: Key papers of 20 years in Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Animesh K. Gain, Yves Bühler, Pascal Haegeli, Daniela Molinari, Mario Parise, David J. Peres, Joaquim G. Pinto, Kai Schröter, Ricardo M. Trigo, María Carmen Llasat, and Heidi Kreibich
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 985–993, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-985-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-985-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies, Socioeconomic and Management Aspects
Regional seismic risk assessment based on ground conditions in Uzbekistan
Vakhitkhan Alikhanovich Ismailov, Sharofiddin Ismatullayevich Yodgorov, Akhror Sabriddinovich Khusomiddinov, Eldor Makhmadiyorovich Yadigarov, Bekzod Uktamovich Aktamov, and Shuhrat Bakhtiyorovich Avazov
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2133–2146, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2133-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2133-2024, 2024
Short summary
Unveiling transboundary challenges in river flood risk management: learning from the Ciliwung River basin
Harkunti Pertiwi Rahayu, Khonsa Indana Zulfa, Dewi Nurhasanah, Richard Haigh, Dilanthi Amaratunga, and In In Wahdiny
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2045–2064, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2045-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2045-2024, 2024
Short summary
Quantitative study of storm surge risk assessment in an undeveloped coastal area of China based on deep learning and geographic information system techniques: a case study of Double Moon Bay
Lichen Yu, Hao Qin, Shining Huang, Wei Wei, Haoyu Jiang, and Lin Mu
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2003–2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2003-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2003-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multisectoral analysis of drought impacts and management responses to the 2008–2015 record drought in the Colorado Basin, Texas
Stephen B. Ferencz, Ning Sun, Sean W. D. Turner, Brian A. Smith, and Jennie S. Rice
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1871–1896, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1871-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1871-2024, 2024
Short summary
Simulating multi-hazard event sets for life cycle consequence analysis
Leandro Iannacone, Kenneth Otárola, Roberto Gentile, and Carmine Galasso
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1721–1740, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1721-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1721-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

AdBPo: https://pianoalluvioni.adbpo.it/piano-gestione-rischio-alluvioni-2021 (last access: 9 May 2022), 2021. 
European Commission: EU overview of methodologies used in preparation of Flood Hazard and Flood Risk Maps – Final Report, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/23526418-c0d4-11e5-9e54-01aa75ed71a1 (last access: 9 May 2022), 2016. 
European Commission: Current Practice in Flood Risk Management in the European Union, https://op.europa.eu/it/publication-detail/-/publication/21d8c5c2-2199-11ec-bd8e-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (last access: 9 May 2022), 2021. 
Gerl, T., Kreibich, H., Franco, G., Marechal, D., and Schröter, K.: A review of flood loss models as basis for harmonization and benchmarking, PLoS ONE, 11, e0159791, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159791, 2016. 
Handmer, J.: The chimera of precision: inherent uncertainties in disaster loss assessment, Int. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters, 20, 325–346, 2002. 
Download
Short summary
The paper discusses challenges (and solutions) emerged during a collaboration among practitioners, stakeholders, and scientists in the definition of flood damage maps in the Po River District. Social aspects were proven to be fundamental components of the risk assessment; variety of competences in the working group was key in finding solutions and revealing weaknesses of intermediate proposals. This paper finally highlights the need of duplicating such an experience at a broader European level.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint