Articles | Volume 22, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1819-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1819-2022
Invited perspectives
 | 
02 Jun 2022
Invited perspectives |  | 02 Jun 2022

Invited perspectives: When research meets practice: challenges, opportunities, and suggestions from the implementation of the Floods Directive in the largest Italian river basin

Tommaso Simonelli, Laura Zoppi, Daniela Molinari, and Francesco Ballio

Related authors

Qualitative flood risk assessment for road and railway infrastructures: the experience of the MOVIDA project
Natasha Petruccelli, Luca Mantecchini, Alice Gallazzi, Daniela Molinari, Mohammed Hammouti, Marco Zazzeri, Simone Sterlacchini, Francesco Ballio, Armando Brath, and Alessio Domeneghetti
Proc. IAHS, 385, 407–413, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-407-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-407-2024, 2024
Short summary
The value of ultra-detailed survey data for an improved flood damage modelling with explicit input data uncertainty treatment: INSYDE 2.0
Mario Di Bacco, Daniela Molinari, and Anna Rita Scorzini
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-179,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-179, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for NHESS
Short summary
A conceptual model for the estimation of flood damage to power grids
Panagiotis Asaridis and Daniela Molinari
Adv. Geosci., 61, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-61-1-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-61-1-2023, 2023
Short summary
INSYDE-BE: adaptation of the INSYDE model to the Walloon region (Belgium)
Anna Rita Scorzini, Benjamin Dewals, Daniela Rodriguez Castro, Pierre Archambeau, and Daniela Molinari
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1743–1761, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1743-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1743-2022, 2022
Short summary
Brief communication: Key papers of 20 years in Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Animesh K. Gain, Yves Bühler, Pascal Haegeli, Daniela Molinari, Mario Parise, David J. Peres, Joaquim G. Pinto, Kai Schröter, Ricardo M. Trigo, María Carmen Llasat, and Heidi Kreibich
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 985–993, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-985-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-985-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies, Socioeconomic and Management Aspects
Factors of influence on flood risk perceptions related to Hurricane Dorian: an assessment of heuristics, time dynamics, and accuracy of risk perceptions
Laurine A. de Wolf, Peter J. Robinson, W. J. Wouter Botzen, Toon Haer, Jantsje M. Mol, and Jeffrey Czajkowski
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1303–1318, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1303-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1303-2024, 2024
Short summary
Anticipating a risky future: long short-term memory (LSTM) models for spatiotemporal extrapolation of population data in areas prone to earthquakes and tsunamis in Lima, Peru
Christian Geiß, Jana Maier, Emily So, Elisabeth Schoepfer, Sven Harig, Juan Camilo Gómez Zapata, and Yue Zhu
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1051–1064, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1051-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1051-2024, 2024
Short summary
A new regionally consistent exposure database for Central Asia: population and residential buildings
Chiara Scaini, Alberto Tamaro, Baurzhan Adilkhan, Satbek Sarzhanov, Vakhitkhan Ismailov, Ruslan Umaraliev, Mustafo Safarov, Vladimir Belikov, Japar Karayev, and Ettore Faga
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 929–945, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-929-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-929-2024, 2024
Short summary
Study on seismic risk assessment model of water supply systems in mainland China
Tianyang Yu, Banghua Lu, Hui Jiang, and Zhi Liu
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 803–822, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-803-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-803-2024, 2024
Short summary
Mapping current and future flood exposure using a 5 m flood model and climate change projections
Connor Darlington, Jonathan Raikes, Daniel Henstra, Jason Thistlethwaite, and Emma K. Raven
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 699–714, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-699-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-699-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

AdBPo: https://pianoalluvioni.adbpo.it/piano-gestione-rischio-alluvioni-2021 (last access: 9 May 2022), 2021. 
European Commission: EU overview of methodologies used in preparation of Flood Hazard and Flood Risk Maps – Final Report, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/23526418-c0d4-11e5-9e54-01aa75ed71a1 (last access: 9 May 2022), 2016. 
European Commission: Current Practice in Flood Risk Management in the European Union, https://op.europa.eu/it/publication-detail/-/publication/21d8c5c2-2199-11ec-bd8e-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (last access: 9 May 2022), 2021. 
Gerl, T., Kreibich, H., Franco, G., Marechal, D., and Schröter, K.: A review of flood loss models as basis for harmonization and benchmarking, PLoS ONE, 11, e0159791, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159791, 2016. 
Handmer, J.: The chimera of precision: inherent uncertainties in disaster loss assessment, Int. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters, 20, 325–346, 2002. 
Download
Short summary
The paper discusses challenges (and solutions) emerged during a collaboration among practitioners, stakeholders, and scientists in the definition of flood damage maps in the Po River District. Social aspects were proven to be fundamental components of the risk assessment; variety of competences in the working group was key in finding solutions and revealing weaknesses of intermediate proposals. This paper finally highlights the need of duplicating such an experience at a broader European level.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint