Articles | Volume 21, issue 5
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1513–1530, 2021
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1513–1530, 2021
Review article
17 May 2021
Review article | 17 May 2021

Review article: A systematic review and future prospects of flood vulnerability indices

Luana Lavagnoli Moreira et al.

Related authors

To which extent are socio-hydrology studies truly integrative? The case of natural hazards and disaster research
Franciele Maria Vanelli, Masato Kobiyama, and Mariana Madruga de Brito
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2301–2317,,, 2022
Short summary
Surveying the Surveyors to Address Risk Perception and Adaptive Behaviour Cross-study Comparability
Samuel Rufat, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Alexander Fekete, Emeline Comby, Peter J. Robinson, Iuliana Armaș, Wouter J. W. Botzen, and Christian Kuhlicke
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.,,, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for NHESS
Short summary
Evaluation of Soil Water Index of distributed Tank Model in a small basin with field data
Sofia Melo Vasconcellos, Masato Kobiyama, and Aline de Almeida Mota
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.,,, 2020
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Multi-criteria decision-making for flood risk management: a survey of the current state of the art
Mariana Madruga de Brito and Mariele Evers
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1019–1033,,, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Risk Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies, Socioeconomic and Management Aspects
The determinants affecting the intention of urban residents to prepare for flood risk in China
Tiantian Wang, Yunmeng Lu, Tiezhong Liu, Yujiang Zhang, Xiaohan Yan, and Yi Liu
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2185–2199,,, 2022
Short summary
Strategic framework for natural disaster risk mitigation using deep learning and cost-benefit analysis
Ji-Myong Kim, Sang-Guk Yum, Hyunsoung Park, and Junseo Bae
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2131–2144,,, 2022
Short summary
Risk communication during seismo-volcanic crises: the example of Mayotte, France
Maud Devès, Robin Lacassin, Hugues Pécout, and Geoffrey Robert
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2001–2029,,, 2022
Short summary
Invited perspectives: Challenges and step changes for natural hazard – perspectives from the German Committee for Disaster Reduction (DKKV)
Benni Thiebes, Ronja Winkhardt-Enz, Reimund Schwarze, and Stefan Pickl
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1969–1972,,, 2022
Short summary
Invited perspectives: When research meets practice: challenges, opportunities, and suggestions from the implementation of the Floods Directive in the largest Italian river basin
Tommaso Simonelli, Laura Zoppi, Daniela Molinari, and Francesco Ballio
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1819–1823,,, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Abbas, A., Amjath-Babu, T. S., Kächele, H., Usman, M., Amjed Iqbal, M., Arshad, M., Adnan Shahid, M., and Müller, K.: Sustainable survival under climatic extremes: linking flood risk mitigation and coping with flood damages in rural Pakistan, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 25, 32491–32505,, 2018. 
Abebe, Y., Kabir, G., and Tesfamariam, S.: Assessing urban areas vulnerability to pluvial flooding using GIS applications and Bayesian Belief Network model, J. Clean. Prod., 174, 1629–1641,, 2018. 
Ahmad, D. and Afzal, M.: Household vulnerability and resilience in flood hazards from disaster-prone areas of Punjab, Pakistan, Nat. Hazards, 99, 337–354,, 2019. 
Amadio, M., Mysiak, J., and Marzi, S.: Mapping Socioeconomic Exposure for Flood Risk Assessment in Italy, Risk Anal., 39, 829–845,, 2019. 
Anowar, F., Sadaoui, S., and Selim, B.: Conceptual and empirical comparison of dimensionality reduction algorithms (PCA, KPCA, LDA, MDS, SVD, LLE, ISOMAP, LE, ICA, t-SNE), Comput. Sci. Rev., 40, 100378,, 2021. 
Short summary
The review of flood vulnerability indices revealed that (1) temporal dynamic aspects were often disregarded, (2) coping and adaptive capacity indicators were frequently ignored, as obtaining these data demand time and effort, and (3) most studies neither applied sensitivity (90.5 %) or uncertainty analyses (96.8 %) nor validated the results (86.3 %). The study highlights the importance of addressing these gaps to produce scientifically rigorous and comparable research.
Final-revised paper