Articles | Volume 20, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2567-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2567-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
01 Oct 2020
Research article |
| 01 Oct 2020
| 01 Oct 2020
A risk-based network analysis of distributed in-stream leaky barriers for flood risk management
Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
JBA Consulting, Skipton, UK
Ian Hewitt
Mathematical Institute, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
Graham Sander
School of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
Federico Danieli
Mathematical Institute, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
Giuseppe Formetta
Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Trento, Trento, Italy
Alissa Kamilova
Mathematical Institute, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
Ann Kretzschmar
Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
Kris Kiradjiev
Mathematical Institute, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
Clint Wong
Mathematical Institute, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
Sam Pegler
School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Director, JBA Trust, Skipton, UK
Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 3,553 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Jan 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,407 | 1,054 | 92 | 3,553 | 96 | 90 |
- HTML: 2,407
- PDF: 1,054
- XML: 92
- Total: 3,553
- BibTeX: 96
- EndNote: 90
Total article views: 2,690 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Oct 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,891 | 722 | 77 | 2,690 | 80 | 72 |
- HTML: 1,891
- PDF: 722
- XML: 77
- Total: 2,690
- BibTeX: 80
- EndNote: 72
Total article views: 863 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Jan 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 516 | 332 | 15 | 863 | 16 | 18 |
- HTML: 516
- PDF: 332
- XML: 15
- Total: 863
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 18
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,553 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,302 with geography defined
and 251 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,690 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,543 with geography defined
and 147 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 863 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 759 with geography defined
and 104 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
15 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Modelling the effectiveness of land‐based natural flood management in a large, permeable catchment S. Collins et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12896
- Quantifying the natural flood management potential of leaky dams in upland catchments, Part II: Leaky dam impacts on flood peak magnitude Z. van Leeuwen et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130449
- Using micro‐catchment experiments for multi‐local scale modelling of nature‐based solutions B. Hankin et al. 10.1002/hyp.14418
- Logjams With a Lower Gap: Backwater Rise and Flow Distribution Beneath and Through Logjam Predicted by Two‐Box Momentum Balance E. Follett et al. 10.1029/2021GL094279
- The importance of retention times in Natural Flood Management interventions E. Follett et al. 10.5194/piahs-385-197-2024
- Field-based monitoring of instream leaky barrier backwater and storage during storm events V. Muhawenimana et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129744
- Nature-based solutions for effective flood mitigation: potential design criteria N. Chappell & K. Beven 10.1088/1748-9326/ad4fa2
- A model for quantifying the effectiveness of leaky barriers as a flood mitigation intervention in an agricultural landscape M. Villamizar et al. 10.1002/rra.4241
- Leaky Dams as Nature-Based Solutions in Flood Management Part I: Introduction and Comparative Efficacy with Conventional Flood Control Infrastructure U. Hansamali et al. 10.3390/hydrology12040095
- Developing a Quantitative Modeling Framework for Risk Propagation Analysis: Application to Preconstruction Delays G. Charbel et al. 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1478
- Leaky Dams as Nature-Based Solutions in Flood Management Part II: Mechanisms, Effectiveness, Environmental Impacts, Technical Challenges, and Emerging Trends U. Hansamali et al. 10.3390/hydrology12040091
- Hydro-geomorphological modelling of leaky wooden dam efficacy from reach to catchment scale with CAESAR-Lisflood 1.9j J. Wolstenholme et al. 10.5194/gmd-18-1395-2025
- How to cope with uncertainty monsters in flood risk management? M. Knotters et al. 10.1017/wat.2024.4
- Momentum and Energy Predict the Backwater Rise Generated by a Large Wood Jam E. Follett et al. 10.1029/2020GL089346
- A risk-based network analysis of distributed in-stream leaky barriers for flood risk management B. Hankin et al. 10.5194/nhess-20-2567-2020
13 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Modelling the effectiveness of land‐based natural flood management in a large, permeable catchment S. Collins et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12896
- Quantifying the natural flood management potential of leaky dams in upland catchments, Part II: Leaky dam impacts on flood peak magnitude Z. van Leeuwen et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130449
- Using micro‐catchment experiments for multi‐local scale modelling of nature‐based solutions B. Hankin et al. 10.1002/hyp.14418
- Logjams With a Lower Gap: Backwater Rise and Flow Distribution Beneath and Through Logjam Predicted by Two‐Box Momentum Balance E. Follett et al. 10.1029/2021GL094279
- The importance of retention times in Natural Flood Management interventions E. Follett et al. 10.5194/piahs-385-197-2024
- Field-based monitoring of instream leaky barrier backwater and storage during storm events V. Muhawenimana et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129744
- Nature-based solutions for effective flood mitigation: potential design criteria N. Chappell & K. Beven 10.1088/1748-9326/ad4fa2
- A model for quantifying the effectiveness of leaky barriers as a flood mitigation intervention in an agricultural landscape M. Villamizar et al. 10.1002/rra.4241
- Leaky Dams as Nature-Based Solutions in Flood Management Part I: Introduction and Comparative Efficacy with Conventional Flood Control Infrastructure U. Hansamali et al. 10.3390/hydrology12040095
- Developing a Quantitative Modeling Framework for Risk Propagation Analysis: Application to Preconstruction Delays G. Charbel et al. 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1478
- Leaky Dams as Nature-Based Solutions in Flood Management Part II: Mechanisms, Effectiveness, Environmental Impacts, Technical Challenges, and Emerging Trends U. Hansamali et al. 10.3390/hydrology12040091
- Hydro-geomorphological modelling of leaky wooden dam efficacy from reach to catchment scale with CAESAR-Lisflood 1.9j J. Wolstenholme et al. 10.5194/gmd-18-1395-2025
- How to cope with uncertainty monsters in flood risk management? M. Knotters et al. 10.1017/wat.2024.4
Latest update: 01 May 2025
Short summary
With growing support for nature-based solutions to reduce flooding by local communities, government authorities and international organisations, it is still important to improve how we assess risk reduction. We demonstrate an efficient, simplified 1D network model that allows us to explore the
whole-systemresponse of numerous leaky barriers placed in different stream networks, whilst considering utilisation, synchronisation effects and cascade failure, and we provide advice on their siting.
With growing support for nature-based solutions to reduce flooding by local communities,...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint