Articles | Volume 20, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1533-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1533-2020
Research article
 | 
29 May 2020
Research article |  | 29 May 2020

Contrasting seismic risk for Santiago, Chile, from near-field and distant earthquake sources

Ekbal Hussain, John R. Elliott, Vitor Silva, Mabé Vilar-Vega, and Deborah Kane

Viewed

Total article views: 4,719 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,389 1,251 79 4,719 438 90 71
  • HTML: 3,389
  • PDF: 1,251
  • XML: 79
  • Total: 4,719
  • Supplement: 438
  • BibTeX: 90
  • EndNote: 71
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Mar 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Mar 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,719 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,998 with geography defined and 721 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Many of the rapidly expanding cities around the world are located near active tectonic faults that have not produced an earthquake in recent memory. But these faults are generally small, and so most previous seismic-hazard analysis has focussed on large, more distant faults. In this paper we show that a moderate-size earthquake on a fault close to the city of Santiago in Chile has a greater impact on the city than a great earthquake on the tectonic boundary in the ocean, about a 100 km away.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint