Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
NHESS
Articles | Volume 20, issue 5
Articles | Volume 20, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1415-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1415-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 20, issue 5
Brief communication
 | 
20 May 2020
Brief communication |  | 20 May 2020

Brief communication: Comparing hydrological and hydrogeomorphic paradigms for global flood hazard mapping

Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Fernando Nardi, Antonio Annis, Vincent Odongo, Maria Rusca, and Salvatore Grimaldi

Viewed

Total article views: 5,063 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,762 1,202 99 5,063 123 163
  • HTML: 3,762
  • PDF: 1,202
  • XML: 99
  • Total: 5,063
  • BibTeX: 123
  • EndNote: 163
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jan 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jan 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,063 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,633 with geography defined and 430 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
Global floodplain mapping has rapidly progressed over the past few years. Different methods have been proposed to identify areas prone to river flooding, resulting in a plethora of available products. Here we assess the potential and limitations of two main paradigms and provide guidance on the use of these global products in assessing flood risk in data-poor regions.
Read more
Share
Special issue
Global- and continental-scale risk assessment for natural...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint