Articles | Volume 20, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1415-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1415-2020
Brief communication
 | 
20 May 2020
Brief communication |  | 20 May 2020

Brief communication: Comparing hydrological and hydrogeomorphic paradigms for global flood hazard mapping

Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Fernando Nardi, Antonio Annis, Vincent Odongo, Maria Rusca, and Salvatore Grimaldi

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (31 Mar 2020) by Hessel Winsemius
AR by Giuliano Di Baldassarre on behalf of the Authors (09 Apr 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (26 Apr 2020) by Hessel Winsemius
AR by Giuliano Di Baldassarre on behalf of the Authors (27 Apr 2020)  Manuscript 
Short summary
Global floodplain mapping has rapidly progressed over the past few years. Different methods have been proposed to identify areas prone to river flooding, resulting in a plethora of available products. Here we assess the potential and limitations of two main paradigms and provide guidance on the use of these global products in assessing flood risk in data-poor regions.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint